Find a nursing home

Home / Virginia / Culpeper

The Culpeper

12425 Village Loop, Culpeper, VA 22701 · Culpeper County · (540) 825-2411

47 certified beds, about 40 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010

Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495400 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on October 18, 2023, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).

Of 19 health citations since February 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.69 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.33 of those hours.

20.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
October 18, 2023Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. E
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessments in a timely manner for four of 26 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1, #48, #36 and #51.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to prepare and store food in a sanitary manner in one of two nourishment refrigerators, the rehab to home unit refrigerator, and in one of two facility kitchens, the main kitchen.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for three of 26 residents in the survey sample, Residents #34, #12, and #51.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #47.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to promote a resident's highest level of well-being for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #51.
  6. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement a fall intervention for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #47.
  7. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to apply an adaptive device to prevent pain for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #12.
  8. D
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    F810 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to use an adaptive feeding device for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #34.
  9. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, Resident #51.
  10. B
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to transmit MDS (minimum data set) assessments in a timely manner for six of 26 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1, #48, #36, #51, #56 and #55.
April 7, 2022Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain clean kitchen equipment in one of two kitchens, the main kitchen.
  2. E
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to have a complete pain management program for one of 21 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 24 (R24). The facility staff failed to clarify the physician orders, document the location of pain and document the level of pain for R24.
  3. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman for a transfer to the emergency room for one of 21 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8 (R8).
  4. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to clarify two physician orders for the treatment of pain for one of 21 residents in the survey smaple, Resident # 194 (R194).
  5. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 22, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for two of 21 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 193 (R193) and # 194 (R194).
February 18, 2021Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection of a pressure injury for one of 20 residents in the survey sample, Resident #16. Resident #16 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a stage two pressure injury on the sacrum/buttocks. The facility staff failed to complete ongoing thorough wound assessments including measurements and staging of the pressure injury from 10/30/20 thorough 11/19/20, and from 11/27/20 through 12/10/20, and failed to provide treatment to the pressure injury from 11/7/20 through 11/17/20, with the exception of 11/14/20. [...]
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to develop and implement the comprehensive care plan for two of 20 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 18 and # 12. The facility staff failed to develop a care plan to address the care required for Resident #18's bowel incontinence and failed to implement Resident # 12's comprehensive care plan for the administration of physician ordered oxygen.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 20 residents in the survey sample, Resident #21. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #21's comprehensive care plan for oxygen therapy/respiratory care.
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services for two of 20 residents in the survey sample, Residents #21 and #12. The facility staff failed to administer oxygen to Residents #21 and #12 per the physician prescribed rate and failed to store Resident #12's nasal cannula in a sanitary manner when not in use. Resident #12's nasal cannula was observed uncovered and coiled over the rear handles on the wheelchair when not in use.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on April 7, 2022.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · April 7, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeVirginiaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.693.763.86
Registered nurses1.330.690.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.833.293.42
Nurse aides3.04
Licensed practical nurses1.33
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)20.0%48.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover9.1%48.2%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.48 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.04 on weekdays and 4.83 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.51 in April to June 2025 to 5.69 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.691.336.044.83 0.0%0 of 9040
Oct to Dec 20255.321.125.704.35 0.0%0 of 9243
Jul to Sep 20255.211.085.614.19 0.0%0 of 9244
Apr to Jun 20255.511.135.974.36 0.0%0 of 9141
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Virginia, Jan to Mar 20263.580.563.763.125.7%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeVirginiaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.014.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.11.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.23.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.81.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.015.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.24.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.214.215.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
20.822.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
27.411.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.11.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.71.51.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CULPEPER BAPTIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITY.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Jacobsen, JamesW-2 managing employeeIndividual02/01/2018
Bales, JamesCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2019
Brooks, SharonCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Browning, HerbertCorporate directorIndividual08/01/2009
Carter, ValerieCorporate directorIndividual02/01/2018
Cave, RCorporate directorIndividual12/31/2021
Franks, TiffanyCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2020
Harris, CharlesCorporate directorIndividual08/01/2009
Jung, JohnCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Keck, MichaelCorporate directorIndividual08/01/2009
Marchello, SallieCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2018
Oakey, SamuelCorporate directorIndividual08/01/2009
Owens, ArneCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2020
Poats, JimCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Poma, JohnCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Scott, MatthewCorporate directorIndividual02/01/2018
Thomson, GaryCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Albritton, TraceyCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2021
Carlton, DanielCorporate officerIndividual12/31/2021
Cook, JonathanCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2015
Hawthorne, LisaCorporate officerIndividual06/14/2021
Markwith, ChristopherCorporate officerIndividual01/31/2018
Moran, ChristineCorporate officerIndividual03/31/2021
Robinson, JohnCorporate officerIndividual02/01/2018
Virginia Baptist Homes IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/01/2009
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2012
Functional Pathways of Tennessee LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/01/2025
Remedi Seniorcare of Virginia LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/26/2009

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on October 18, 2023: "Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on October 18, 2023: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 18, 2023: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 7, 2022: "Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Virginia contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is The Culpeper's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates The Culpeper 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Culpeper get at its last inspection?
10 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on October 18, 2023. The Virginia average is 14.3.
Has The Culpeper been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does The Culpeper accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns The Culpeper?
CMS lists 28 owners and managers. Legal business name: CULPEPER BAPTIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection