602 Madison Road, Culpeper, VA 22701 · Culpeper County · (540) 825-2884
180 certified beds, about 171 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495279 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 10, 2024, inspectors cited 23 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 52 health citations since May 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,298 in the last three years; the largest was $16,298, and the latest is dated July 10, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.34 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.29 of those hours.
59.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Lifeworks Rehab, an affiliated group of 64 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 52 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure three of five residents were free from verbal abuse, Residents #3, #4 and #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for three of five residents in the survey sample, Residents #3, #4, and #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provided medical related social services for three of five residents in the survey sample, Residents #3, #4 and #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for three of five residents, Resident #3, #4, and #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to treat one of five residents in the survey sample, in a dignified manner, Resident #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to completely document grievances and failed to document the resolution of the grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on family interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to release the medical records for one of three residents in the survey sample, in a timely manner, Resident #1.
Inspectors wrote3. For Resident #97 (R97), the facility staff failed to provide supervision for safe LOA (leave of absence). On 7/9/24 at 10:08 a.m., R97 was interviewed. He stated that he leaves the premises and walks across the street to the store about once a week by himself. He also stated that he lets the front desk, and the nurses know before leaving, but staff do not supervise his trips. He stated that he should be using his cane to walk, but he does not. On 7/9/24 at 5:50 PM, R97 was observed walking over to Walgreens without a cane. He looked both ways on his way to Walgreens while crossing Sunset Lane. He was observed crossing 4 lanes of traffic across the street with no staff supervision. He walked with a shuffling gait. Upon his return to the facility, he was observed crossing the same 4 lanes of traffic with no staff supervision and did not look for oncoming traffic. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to respond to resident council concerns for two of three resident council meetings reviewed, the May 2024 and June 2024 meetings.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a change in condition and possible need to alter treatment for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #106.
Inspectors wrote4. For Resident #32 (R32), Resident #34 (R34), and Resident #104 (R104), the facility staff failed to serve lunch in a homelike manner on 7/8/24. Staff left meal trays and plate lids sitting on the tables during the meal. On R32's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/27/24, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. On R34's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/29/24, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. [...]
Inspectors wrote4. For Resident #86, the facility staff failed to implement the care plan for pressure injury (1) care. The comprehensive care plan dated, 3/1/24, documented in part, Focus: Skin Impairment: The resident has a skin impairment: R/L (right/left) groin necrotizing fasciitis post-surgical, R/L ABD (abdominal) rash, L axilla hidradenitis, L/R scrotum hidradenitis, R lateral groin post-surgical necrotizing fasciitis, L groin post-surgical necrotizing fasciitis, sacrum pressure. The Interventions documented in part, Notify MD (medical doctor) as indicated. Observe area for signs of improvement or decline. Treatment as ordered. The wound care nurse practitioner note dated 5/20/24 documented in part, Sacrum scar tissue. The wound care physician notes dated, 5/31/24, documented in part, Sacrum - stage 2 (2) measuring approximately 1x1x 0.1 cm (centimeters) in size. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services to promote or maintain the highest level of well being for two of 50 residents in the survey sample; Residents #269 and #151.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to prevent one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #269, from a significant medication error.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain one of one kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices for four of four residents in medication administration and one of one infection control program, Residents #45, #25, #132, #118 and the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the call bell in a position accessible to the resident for two of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #89 and Resident #13.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the baseline care plan for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Residents #470.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the residents current status for two of 50 residents in the survey sample; Resident #148 and #120.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for dependent residents for three of 50 residents in the survey sample, Residents #90, #89 and #151.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to assess and monitor a pressure injury for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #86.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to provide toenail care for one of 50 residents, Resident #56 (R56).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to apply splints for one of 50 residents, Resident #56.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a urinary catheter bag in a sanitary manner for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interivew, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide respiratory services for two of 50 residents in the survey sample, Residents #56 and #13.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to act on a pharmacy recommendation for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #79.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from an unnecessary psychotropic medication for one of 50 residents in the survey sample, Resident #79.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review it was determined facility staff failed to secure Medications in a safe and secure manner according to professional standards for two of 50 residents, Resident #32 and Resident #159.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to perform a bed inspection for two of 50 residents in the survey sample, Residents #86 and #124.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) program training was completed for one of five employees reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and service for a complete dialysis program for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #87 (R87).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens. 1. The facility staff failed to seal one 13.9 ounce package of dry gravy mix in one of one dry food storage rooms. 2. The facility staff failed to close a box containing one frozen pie and seal a package of frozen cookie dough in one of one walk-in freezers.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to determine if a resident had an Advance Directive for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #110 (R110).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to respect the resident's right to privacy for one of 55 residents, Resident #467.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 55 residents in the survey sample; Residents #146 and #82.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to maintain a resident's highest level of well-being for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #367. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #367's (R367) high white blood cell count (1) result was addressed by the nurse practitioner on 7/8/22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide treatment to a pressure ulcer in a sanitary manner for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #107 (R107). For R107, the nurse providing wound care failed to wash/sanitize hands between glove changes (between dirty and clean parts of the procedure).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent accidents and hazards for one of 55 residents in the survey sample; Resident #146.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services per the plan of care for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #82. For Resident #82 (R82), the facility staff failed to administer to oxygen at the physician prescribed rate of 3 liters per minute.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure the nurse practitioner and/or physician supervised the residents care for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #367. The covering nurse practitioner failed to address Resident #367's (R367) reported high white blood cell count (1) on 7/8/22 when reported by the laboratory.
Inspectors wrote2. For R107, the nurse providing wound care failed to follow infection control procedures related to washing/sanitizing hands between glove changes (between dirty and clean parts of the procedure). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/5/22, R107 was coded as being in a persistent vegetative state. R107 was coded as having no pressure ulcers during the look back period. On 9/14/22 at 10:59 a.m., RN (registered nurse) #3 was observed as she provided wound care to R107. RN #3 removed the old dressing from the top of R107's right foot wound. RN#3 cleansed the wound with wound cleanser, and wiped the wound with dry gauze. RN #3 threw the soiled gauze in the trash can, removed her dirty gloves and put on a clean pair of gloves. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to determine and document the pneumococcal vaccination status for two of five residents in the infection control review, Residents #128 and #218.
Inspectors wrote2. The facility staff failed to maintain a functioning call bell system for Resident #217 (R217). There was no MDS (minimum data set) assessment completed at the time of survey. The Admission/readmission Nursing Collection Tool dated 9/6/2022, documented in part, R217 was cognitively intact. During the resident interview on 9/13/2022 at approximately 11:30 a.m. R217 stated it takes a long time for the staff to answer the call bell. Observation was made of the call bell on 9/13/2022 at approximately 1:30 p.m. The call bell was turned on by one surveyor. The other surveyor observed that the call light outside the room did not turn on. An interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #8 on 9/13/2022 at 1:49 p.m. When asked if a resident's call bell is not working, how does the staff know when the need assistance, LPN #8 stated they make constant rounds. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to post daily nurse staffing information before the shift. On 09/13/2022 and 09/14/2022 the facility staff failed to post the nurse staffing prior to the beginning of the shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to promote resident's dignity for three of 33 current residents in the survey sample, Resident's # 26, #141 and #108. The facility staff were observed standing while feeding Resident #26 and Resident #141. The facility staff failed to provide privacy for Resident # 108's catheter collection bag [1].
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for the use of TED hose for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of nine residents in the medication administration observation, Resident #30. The facility staff failed to follow medication administration standards of practice during the administration of a Dulera Aerosol inhaler to Resident #30 on 5/17/2021.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow the physician's order for the use of TED hose for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services for a catheter bag for one of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #142. Multiple observations of Resident #142 revealed the attached leg bag above the level of the nephrostomy (1) site it was connected to.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #38 and #42. 1. The facility staff failed to maintain an Ambu bag [1] at Resident # 38's bed side according to physician's orders. 2. The facility staff failed to store a nebulizer (1) in a sanitary manner for Resident #42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a functional call system for two of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #46 and Resident #66. Resident #46 and Resident #66 shared a room with a broken call bell and had no alternate means to call staff when the call bell was not working.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to dispose of trash in a sanitary manner in one of three rolling linen carts positioned outside the kitchen door. The rolling linen cart was open to air, and contained standing water and several bags of trash. One of the bags contained soiled linens which were covered in green mold like appearing substance.
11 fire safety citations on file: 5 on July 10, 2024, 4 on September 15, 2022, 2 on May 19, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 10, 2024 | Fine | $16,298 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.34 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.29 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.12 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.88 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.17 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 59.2% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.60 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.43 on weekdays and 3.12 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 26.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.27 in April to June 2025 to 3.34 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.29 | 3.43 | 3.12 | 26.0% | 0 of 90 | 171 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.28 | 3.48 | 3.04 | 30.9% | 0 of 92 | 171 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.35 | 0.25 | 3.48 | 3.01 | 31.4% | 0 of 92 | 171 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.27 | 0.25 | 3.40 | 2.94 | 33.7% | 0 of 91 | 169 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.6 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.3 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 272 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 250 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 159 eligible stays.
77.3% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 88 residents counted.
2.8% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 141 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 141 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CULPEPER CARE CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Lifeworks Rehab, a group of 64 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culpeper Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Ak 2003 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Al 2003 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Charles 1994 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Edward 1998 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Matt 2002 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Mrcz Central LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Nathan 5604 & Family LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Nathan 5604 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Pivotal Central LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Sas 1998 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Saul 2012 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Silverstone East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Morrison, Candy | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/28/2021 | |
| Rybst Central Manager LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/28/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.