Home / California / Portola Valley
The Sequoias
501 Portola Road, Portola Valley, CA 94028 · San Mateo County · (650) 851-1501
43 certified beds, about 31 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055466 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 7, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 20 health citations since December 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,703 in the last three years; the largest was $12,703, and the latest is dated October 30, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.28 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.
6.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
August 7, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when a carton of orange juice and 4 cartons of apple juice and a paper cup wrapped in plastic, inside the refrigerator in the pantry, has no expiration date, has no use by date, cup has no label. This failure has the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/4/25 at 10:30 AM, with Registered Dietitian (RD), in the refrigerator in the pantry, found one orange juice carton, and four apple juice cartons, with no expiration date and no use by date, and one paper cup wrapped in plastic no label. RD stated, every food stored in the refrigerator should have expiration dates or use by dates and should be labeled. [...]
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN, a document informing residents Medicare will no longer pay for services and allows residents to make informed decisions on whether to continue certain services, which may incur out of pocket costs) to one (Resident 22) of three residents, when Resident 22 was discharged from Medicare Part A (temporary insurance which covers hospital and skilled nursing services) to long term care. This failure could have resulted in Resident 22 not given a chance to make informed decisions regarding his care or for his right to appeal. [...]
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise plan of care for Resident 32, one of 12 sampled residents, after 10 incidents of falls, to prevent further falls. This failure could result in resident's harm .Review of Resident 32's Facesheet, dated 8/5/24, indicated, Resident 32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Peripheral Vascular Disease (a condition that blood vessels are narrowed causing less blood flow to the limbs), Pain left leg , Cognitive Communication Deficit, Generalized Anxiety Disorder. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/4/25 at 10:50 AM, in Resident 32's room, Resident 32 was observed in bed and had a caregiver(CG) from a private agency. CG stated she has been with patient for four years now, since last year doing 12 hour shift, was 24 hours before. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications (narcotics that have high abuse potential) were fully accounted for when a random controlled medication use audit for two out of four sampled residents (Residents 4, 24) did not reconcile. The residents' medications were signed out of the Controlled Drugs Records (CDR, inventory record of controlled drugs) but not documented on the Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR, record of medications administered to a resident) to indicate they were administered to the residents. This failure resulted in inaccurate accountability of controlled medications and had the potential for abuse and narcotic diversion (unlawful distribution or use) of controlled medications.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use was implemented when: 1. The Infection Preventionist (IP, a licensed nurse that has specialized training in infection prevention) did not communicate or provide notification to the primary medical doctor when the residents' presenting symptoms did not meet criteria for antibiotic use based on McGeer criteria (Standardized criteria to help consistently identify and classify infections treated with antibiotics) for 2 out of 6 residents (Residents 22 and 17).2. The IP did not track the antibiotic use for 1 out of 6 residents (Resident 26). [...]
May 24, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were met for food storage in the kitchen when there was a garlic oil container beyond its use-by date in the refrigerator. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure there was a clean comfortable homelike environment when these two issues were found: 1. Two window screens had gaps. 2. Washbasins in four different rooms were found stored on the bathroom floor. Failure to ensure window screens were properly maintained had the potential to allow flying pests into residents' living spaces. Failure to store Resident's washbasins in a sanitary manner had the potential for residents to be exposed to dirty personal care equipment or infectious agents.
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to transmit one of 12 sample residents' MDS (Resident 22) in a timely manner and failed to complete and transmit one of 12 sample residents' MDS (Resident 26). Failure to transmit required assessments violated the facility's contractual agreement with the State and CMS. Additionally, the facility failed to provide a policy governing the tracking and timely transmission of MDSs.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to accurately code Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, one of 12 sample residents. Failure to accurately code Resident 10's assessment regarding restraints did not ensure health care providers could make safe and individualized health care decisions/recommendations based on Resident 10's MDS. Additionally, the facility failed to provide a policy regarding accurately coding a resident's MDS assessment.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for one of 12 sample residents (Resident 11). The facility failed to address Resident 11's behavior of refusing footrests for her wheelchair. Failure to develop an individualized care plan did not ensure the facility was providing care tailored to Resident 11's personal needs.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was monitoring for adverse side effect (harmful effects suspected to be caused by a medicine) or behavioral monitoring for Ambien (same as Zolpidem, a drug used to treat insomnia) for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 136). This failure could result in Resident 136 receiving unnecessary use of, ineffective, and/or lack of monitoring for psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories: (i) Anti-psychotic [a type of psychiatric medication which are available on prescription to treat psychosis]; (ii) Anti-depressant [prescription medicines to treat depression]; [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all medications were properly labeled in one out of one sampled medication carts when Resident 132's Prednisone (a medication used to decrease swelling in the body) label was not consistent with the physician order written in the electronic medical record (EMR). This failure has the potential to result in a medication error that could over dose a resident or under dose them.
- D Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) data to Center for Medicare Services (CMS) in a timely manner. Failure to transmit staffing data did not ensure the facility was fulfilling their contract agreement with the State and CMS. Additionally, the facility provided an incomplete PBJ data transmission policy which lacked certain key policy elements.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure an intervention recommended by a physician was communicated in a timely fashion for Resident 1, one of 12 sampled residents. Resident 1 had a fracture of unknown origin, and his physician recommended no Hoyer lift (a transfer device). This recommendation was not communicated in a timely manner to all direct caregivers. Failure to communicate physician's recommendations to direct caregivers had the potential to inflict and/or worsen an injury. Additionally, the facility failed to provide their policy regarding shift-to-shift endorsement.
December 30, 2021Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide residents with the written summary of the Baseline Care Plan (BCP, Baseline Care Plan is developed and implemented for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care of the resident that meet professional standard of quality care and must be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission) for seven (7) residents out of 12 sampled residents, Residents 4, 16, 18, 6, 13, 14, 75. Failure to provide written summary of the BCP to the residents had the potential to compromise person-centered care to each resident, and to safeguard against adverse events that are most likely to occur right after admission.
- E Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment according to standards of clinical practice for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 21) when: 1. The Omeprazole (a medication used to treat frequent heartburn and stomach ulcers) was not administered according to current physician's order for Resident 4. This failure resulted in a medication error. 2. The facility's procedure on management of indwelling catheter and closed drainage system was not implemented for Resident 21. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination of infection that may jeopardize the health and safety of Resident 21.
- E Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the garbage are contained and a dumpster are covered. This facility's failure has the potential to attract pest to the area.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain its infection control program when: 1. Cleaning and disinfection of the glucometer (a device used to measure blood sugar level) was not performed after use for Resident 18 who was on fingerstick blood sugar monitoring. 2. Resident 21's urinary drainage bag was left uncovered and touching the floor. 3. For Resident 13, the canister and the suction drainage tubing for urine collection was unlabeled and undated and the suction drainage tubing for urine collection was not cleaned after use. Failure to implement infection prevention practices may result in cross contamination of infection that may jeopardize the health and safety of the residents.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively assess or develop therapeutic interventions to one of one sampled resident (Resident 14). The failure resulted in Resident 14 experiencing severe weight loss.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled according to federal regulations and facility policy and procedure when: 1. There was no direction change refer to chart label on the Omeprazole (a medication used to treat frequent heartburn and stomach ulcers) medication blister pack (a card that packages doses of medication within small, clear, or light-resistant amber-colored plastic bubbles) for Resident 4. 2. Suppository medications for two discharged residents were not removed from the active medication storage cabinet. These deficient practices had the potential to cause harm to residents through infection and medication errors.
Fire safety inspections
23 fire safety citations on file: 7 on August 7, 2025, 12 on May 24, 2024, 4 on December 30, 2021.
Every fire safety citation23 citations
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- C Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- C Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- E Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- E Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- E Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 30, 2023 | Fine | $12,703 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.28 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.00 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.37 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.30 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 6.3% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 0.0% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.80 on weekdays and 3.00 on weekends, 38% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.29 in April to June 2025 to 4.28 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.28 | 0.61 | 4.80 | 3.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 31 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.91 | 0.86 | 5.03 | 4.58 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 32 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.96 | 0.75 | 5.09 | 4.64 | 1.2% | 0 of 92 | 32 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.29 | 0.82 | 5.43 | 4.94 | 1.4% | 0 of 91 | 30 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.0 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.3 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.9 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SEQUOIA LIVING INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequoia Living Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/18/1967 |
| McVey, Sarah | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/24/2019 | |
| Agostino, Valerie | Corporate director | Individual | 12/07/2020 | |
| Corriea, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 05/19/2021 | |
| Herman, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Howie, Carl | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2011 | |
| Ito, Holly | Corporate director | Individual | 10/25/2022 | |
| Jamison, David | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2014 | |
| Lim, Marianne | Corporate director | Individual | 07/21/2020 | |
| Lynn, Patricia | Corporate director | Individual | 04/29/2020 | |
| Mayeda, Nancy | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Sanderson, Cory | Corporate director | Individual | 05/29/2024 | |
| Spaulding, Dianne | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2014 | |
| Suey, Marilyn | Corporate director | Individual | 05/22/2023 | |
| McVey, Sarah | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/24/2019 | |
| Shoemake, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/14/2020 | |
| Chen, Can | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| McVey, Sarah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/24/2019 | |
| Wasley-Fairley, Suzanne | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2022 | |
| Sequoia Living Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/14/2025 | |
| Atwood, Martha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/03/1994 | |
| Chen, Can | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2017 | |
| McVey, Sarah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/24/2019 | |
| Shoemake, Charles | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/14/2025 | |
| Wasley-Fairley, Suzanne | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.00 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
Other nursing homes nearby
- VI at Palo Alto Palo Alto, 5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Atherton Park Post-Acute Menlo Park, 5.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- The Terraces at Los Altos Health Facility Los Altos, 5.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Palo Alto Post-Acute Palo Alto, 5.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Webster House Palo Alto, 6.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Devonshire Oaks Nursing Center Redwood City, 6.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Villa Siena Mountain View, 7.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Los Altos Post-Acute Los Altos, 7.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 52 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is The Sequoias's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates The Sequoias 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did The Sequoias get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 7, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has The Sequoias been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,703 in the last three years.
- Does The Sequoias accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns The Sequoias?
- CMS lists 25 owners and managers. Legal business name: SEQUOIA LIVING INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.