Home / California / Palo Alto
VI at Palo Alto
600 Sand Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304 · Santa Clara County · (650) 853-5001
44 certified beds, about 36 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare since 2006
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555835 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 26, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 18 health citations since March 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 6.10 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.69 of those hours.
20.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
CMS links it to VI Living, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.
January 26, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Kitchen Staff F (KS F) used proper technique when testing sanitizer concentration for cleaning food contact surfaces. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of contamination and exposure to food borne illness for 37 residents in the facility.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and revised timely for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents 30 and 7) when: 1. Resident 30's Care Plan indicated Full Code and the physician's order indicated DNR;2a. Resident 7's Care Plan indicated Full Code and the POLST indicated DNR; and2b. Resident 7's Care Plan did not indicate self-administration of medication. These failures had the potential to affect the provision of care.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacy consultant's medication regimen review recommendation for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to affect the safety and management of the resident's medication regimen.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications when inspection of two of three medication carts identified an insulin pen without a visible resident's name on it. This failure had the potential for the unlabeled insulin to be administered to the wrong resident.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when the shared glucometer was not sanitized and disinfected for one out of two sampled residents. This failure could result in cross-contamination and the spread of infection throughout the facility.
August 23, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their restraint protocol and ensure the proper use of side rails or bed canes (adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed) for nine (Residents 1, 12, 22, 26, 32, 33, 191, 243, and 246) of 24 residents (residents who used side rails or bed canes) when: 1. Resident 1 there was no physician order, side rail assessment, consent, or care plan for the use of side rails; 2. For Resident 243 there was no physician order or care plan for the use of bed canes; 3. For Resident 246 there was no physician order for the use of bed canes; 4. For Resident 191 there was no physician order or care plan for the use of bed canes; 5. For Resident 12 there was no physician order or consent for the use of bed canes; 6. For Resident 22 there was no consent for the use of bed canes; 7. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. There was an opened undated food item in the pantry freezer; 2. There were open and undated food items, and unopened food items with no expiration dates in the dry storage area of the main kitchen. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and food-borne illness to 37 of 37 residents who received their food from the kitchen. 1. During an initial kitchen tour on 8/19/24 at 9:20 a.m., accompanied by the Executive Chef (EC), inside the reach-in freezer there was an opened, undated container of mango sorbet. The EC confirmed the sorbet was opened and not dated and he stated all items should have been dated when opened. The EC stated the mango sorbet must be discarded. 2. [...]
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of residents to confidentiality of protected health information (PHI, any information in the medical record that can be used to identify an individual and that was created, used, or disclosed in the course of providing a health care service) when staff members left the computer screen open and unattended in the hallways of resident care areas. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the rights of the residents to privacy and confidentiality.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate pharmaceutical services when there were discrepancies between the controlled drug (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) record (CDR, an inventory/accountability sheet) and the medication administration record (MAR) for two out of two residents (Residents 140 and 26). This failure resulted in the facility not having accountability of controlled medications, which had the potential for misuse or diversion.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility had a facility medication error rate of 7.59% when two medication errors occurred out of 26 opportunities during medication administration for two out of 5 residents (Resident 21 and Resident 32). This failure resulted in medication not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders which resulted in residents not receiving the full therapeutic effects of the medications.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices for two out of two sampled residents when: 1) A Licensed Vocational Nurse E (LVN E) did not disinfect a glucometer after using it to test a resident's blood sugar (Resident 32). 2) A Registered Nurse C (RN C) did not scrub the hub (an endcap) at the end of a peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC, a type of tube that goes directly to the heart) line for 15 seconds before flushing the PICC line with normal saline solution and before connecting the intravenous (IV) drug tubing to the PICC line (Resident 191). 3) RN D did not wear gloves when removing a medicated patch from a resident's chest, then did not wear gloves or perform hand hygiene when applying a new medicated patch to the resident's chest (Resident 15). [...]
March 22, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and supervision to prevent an accident for one of three residents (Resident 1) when physical therapy (PT, a healthcare profession that helps you move better or strengthen weakened muscles) did not follow physician's orders to assess Resident 1's functional ability level upon admission and develop a resident-centered plan of care. This resulted in Resident 1's fall, head injuries, multiple fractures, and subsequent death.
February 15, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accidents when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) fell during mechanical lift transfer. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining lots of bruises to the body and had been feeling fearful during transfers.
March 17, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions when: 1. There were unlabeled and undated food items in the kitchen refrigerator and blast chiller (equipment that quickly lowers food temperature); 2. There were dented cans of food in the dry storage area of the kitchen; 3. There was a black substance on the inside of one out of two ice machines; and 4. Kitchen attendant B (KA B) did not follow printed instructions when testing the surface sanitizer (solution used to kill microorganisms on kitchen surfaces). These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and illness for all residents who received food from the kitchen (34 of 35 residents).
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and/or document restorative nursing assistant (RNA) treatments for one of five sampled residents (Resident 26). This failure had the potential to result in functional decline for Resident 26.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 5), when her oxygen humidifier bottle (a bottle filled with water connected to the oxygen source to keep the airways moist) was empty and oxygen humidifier bottle was not changed weekly. These failures had the potential to affect the residents' health and safety.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 5 and 24) when: 1. The licensed nurse irrigated the left and right nephrostomy (an artificial opening created between the kidneys and the skin to facilitate urine drainage) tubes with one syringe; and 2. The licensed nurse did not perform hand hygiene between tasks. These failures had the potential for the development and the spread of infections in the facility.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship program (program intended to prevent the overuse of antibiotics) for one of three sample residents (Resident 26). Resident 26 received a course of antibiotics, but did not meet the criteria for antibiotic treatment. This failure had the potential to increase the prevalence of multi-drug resistant organisms in the facility.
Fire safety inspections
9 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 26, 2026, 3 on August 23, 2024, 4 on March 17, 2023.
Every fire safety citation9 citations
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 6.10 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 5.46 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.32 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.10 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 20.3% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.36 on weekdays and 5.46 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.86 in April to June 2025 to 6.10 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 6.10 | 1.69 | 6.36 | 5.46 | 6.5% | 0 of 90 | 36 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.91 | 1.63 | 6.24 | 5.07 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 37 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.81 | 1.34 | 6.03 | 5.24 | 1.7% | 0 of 92 | 38 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.86 | 1.33 | 6.10 | 5.25 | 3.3% | 0 of 91 | 38 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.4 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.0 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.1 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.4 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.2 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CC PALO ALTO LLC. CMS links this home to VI Living, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 4.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cc Development Group LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/23/1999 |
| Margot and Tom Pritzker Foundation | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10% | 05/22/2025 |
| P. G. - Daniel Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 01/01/2012 |
| P. G. - Don #3 Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 01/01/2012 |
| P. G. - Jim Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 01/01/2012 |
| P. G. - Johnny Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 01/01/2012 |
| P. G. - Karen Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 9% | 01/01/2012 |
| P. G. - Linda Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 01/01/2012 |
| P. G. - Nicholas Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 01/01/2012 |
| P. G. - Tony Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 01/01/2012 |
| Pritzker Pucker Family Foundation No. 2 | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 9% | 05/22/2025 |
| Cope, Tara | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2018 | |
| Maslow, Cary | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/2019 | |
| Muszynski, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Boyle, Neal | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/14/2020 | |
| Fowler, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/11/2024 | |
| Hibbs, Alexander | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/10/2022 | |
| Classic Residence Management Limited Partnership | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2000 | |
| Alves, Valerie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/10/2022 | |
| Evraets, Melissa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2020 | |
| Fadem, Andrea | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/23/2021 | |
| Halvaei, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/06/2025 | |
| Hussain, Yusra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/23/2008 | |
| Koselak, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/16/2016 | |
| Koszylko, Tomek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/18/2018 | |
| Williams, Bridget | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2022 | |
| Poorman, John | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/28/2025 | |
| Smith, Gary | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/11/2025 | |
| Classic Residence Management Limited Partnership | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/11/2025 | |
| Alves, Valerie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/10/2022 | |
| Evraets, Melissa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2020 | |
| Fadem, Andrea | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/23/2021 | |
| Halvaei, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/06/2025 | |
| Hussain, Yusra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/23/2008 | |
| Koselak, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/16/2016 | |
| Koszylko, Tomek | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/15/2018 | |
| Maslow, Cary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2019 | |
| Williams, Bridget | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 23, 2024: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 26, 2026: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 26, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 26, 2026: "Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Atherton Park Post-Acute Menlo Park, 1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Palo Alto Post-Acute Palo Alto, 1.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Webster House Palo Alto, 1.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Devonshire Oaks Nursing Center Redwood City, 4.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- The Terraces at Los Altos Health Facility Los Altos, 4.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- The Sequoias Portola Valley, 5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Villa Siena Mountain View, 6.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Camino Ridge Post-Acute Mountain View, 7.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 74 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is VI at Palo Alto's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates VI at Palo Alto 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did VI at Palo Alto get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 26, 2026. The California average is 15.6.
- Has VI at Palo Alto been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does VI at Palo Alto accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns VI at Palo Alto?
- CMS lists 38 owners and managers, and links the home to VI Living. Legal business name: CC PALO ALTO LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.