Truman W Smith Children's Care Center
2200 W Upshur Ave, Gladewater, TX 75647 · Gregg County · (903) 845-2181
120 certified beds, about 99 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicaid since 1999
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 45F470 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 18, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 13 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.78 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.71 of those hours.
35.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
March 17, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications was provided for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for feeding tube management. (Resident #1 and Resident #2)The facility failed to follow the physician's orders for Resident #1's feeding tube (medical device to deliver nutrition, hydration, and medication directly to the stomach) rate (how fast it was given) of delivery on 3/16/26 and 3/17/26. The facility failed to follow the physician orders for Resident #2's feeding tube duration of administration and total volume (amount) of feeding on 3/17/26. These failures placed residents at risk for vomiting, aspiration (accidental breathing in food, liquid, or foreign material into airway/lungs which increased the risk of pneumonia (lung infection), malnutrition, and weight gain or loss.
November 18, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure RT C acknowledged Resident #63 while providing care on 11/16/25. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of anxiety and a diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's head of the bed was elevated while receiving a tube feeding (delivers liquid nutrition through a flexible tube that goes directly into your stomach or small intestine) on 11/16/25. This failure could place residents with gastrostomy tube at risk for complications from feeding tube administration such as aspiration and pneumonia.
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, for 1 of 1 laundry room reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the air filters in the laundry room were clean, the air filters were dirty with a thick dark gray substance. This failure could place the residents at risk of living and working in an unsafe, unsanitary and uncomfortable environment.
January 14, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements and kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure all foods stored in the freezers, and dry pantry were not kept past their expiration dates and did not contain employee personal items. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents observed for incontinent care infection control practices (Resident #79), and 3 of 3 residents observed for medication administration control practices. (Resident #'s 27, 91, 71). 1. CNA A did not change her gloves or sanitize her hands after performing incontinent care on the front perineal area for Resident #79 and touched clean areas. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN G performed hand hygiene before and after administering medications to 3 different residents. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 23 residents reviewed for environment. (Resident #48) 1. The facility failed to remove a green sputum filled suction canister over ¾ full in the room of Resident #48 a timely manner. This failure placed resident at risk of exposure to growing bacteria from another resident, living in an uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth.
February 10, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for infection control. 1. While in outbreak status for COVID-19, CNA A, LVN B, and Sitter C failed to wear N-95 masks as identified as a requirement in the facility policy. 2. While removing Resident #1's speaker valve, RT D did not wash, sanitize her hands, or wear gloves during the procedure. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices.
December 6, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with limited range of motion appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 4 of 23 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident #6, Resident #21, Resident #67, and Resident #68) The facility failed to provide restorative therapy for contractures or contracture prevention for Resident #6, Resident #21, Resident #67, and Resident #68. This failure could place residents who had contractures at risk of not attaining/or maintaining their highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated foods were properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure the fryer was clean and free of food debris. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment that was free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 24 residents (Resident # 25) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to protect Resident #25 when CNA A shook off the metal hook from the mechanical lift with her hands causing the metal hook to fall and hit Resident #25 in the chest and fall to her lap. This failure could place residents at risk for injury or harm.
- D Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 3 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident # 51). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident # 51 did not contain expired foods. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 22 residents (Residents # 5) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure that a urine sample was removed from Resident # 5's dresser. These failures placed residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on November 18, 2025, 2 on January 14, 2025, 1 on December 6, 2023.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.78 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.71 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.13 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.76 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.31 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.0% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 26.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 6.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.05 on weekdays and 4.13 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.67 in April to June 2025 to 4.78 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.78 | 0.71 | 5.05 | 4.13 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 99 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.73 | 0.72 | 4.93 | 4.24 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 101 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.85 | 0.78 | 5.16 | 4.06 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 102 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.67 | 0.84 | 4.98 | 3.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 102 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 17, 2026: "Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 14, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 14, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 18, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center G Gladewater, 1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- Pine Tree Lodge Nursing Center Longview, 9.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Buckner Westminster Place Longview, 12.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Heritage at Longview Healthcare Center Longview, 12.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- The Oaks at Longview Longview, 12.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Focused Care of Gilmer Gilmer, 12.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 49 citations
- Avir at Longview Longview, 13.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 56 citations
- Gilmer Nursing & Rehabilitation Gilmer, 13.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 57 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Truman W Smith Children's Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Truman W Smith Children's Care Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Truman W Smith Children's Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 18, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Truman W Smith Children's Care Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Truman W Smith Children's Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Truman W Smith Children's Care Center?
- CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.