Home / California / Santa Barbara
Valle Verde Health Facility
900 Calle De Los Amigos, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 · Santa Barbara County · (805) 883-4000
80 certified beds, about 56 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1972
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055733 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 9, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 23 health citations since March 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.79 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.
25.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
CMS links it to Humangood, an affiliated group of 17 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
June 29, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an unstageable (a severe wound where the true depth and extent of tissue damage cannot be determined because the wound bed is completely obscured by dead tissue) pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue) in one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a left ankle-foot orthosis boot (AFO - a medical brace designed to support the ankle) status post-surgery and was found with an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left foot approximately 6 weeks later. [...]
January 9, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment -a medical document that translates treatment preferences into actionable medical orders) was signed by the Responsible Party (RP- one who has authority to make healthcare decisions) for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 14). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 14's wishes regarding medical treatment not being followed.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Develop a care plan and interventions for hearing impairment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential for Resident 8's hearing impairment to worsen and thus impact the resident's quality of life.2. Implement care plan interventions for Resident 11 related to access to call light and repositioning in bed. This failure had the potential for Resident 11 not to receive the necessary care needed. 1. During a record review of Resident 8's comprehensive assessment, dated 12/04/25, this indicated Resident 8 was assessed to have hearing impairment. During an observation on 01/07/26 at10:55 a.m. Resident 8 was in the common area near the activity room reading a newspaper with no hearing aids. When greeted, Resident 8 just stared at this surveyor. During an interview on 01/08/26 at 10: [...]
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: 4Number of residents cited: 1Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a mechanically altered diet order for one unsampled resident (Resident 53), who had dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), when staff served Resident 53 coffee without thickener. This failure had the potential to cause swallowing discomfort and/or aspiration (the accidental entry of a fluid or food into the airway or lungs) for Resident 53. During a review of Resident 53's clinical record, it indicated that Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Bell's Palsy. During an observation on 1/6/26 at 12:18 p.m. in the resident dining room, Resident 53 was served a meal tray by staff. As Resident 53 started eating without assistance, another staff member brought Resident 53 a cup of coffee, from which Resident 53 sipped. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. The Infection Prevention Control and Program (IPCP) standards and policies were reviewed at least annually. This failure had the potential for the facility to implement outdated infection control standards, policies, and protocols that can lead to an ineffective infection control program2. Staff followed manufacturer's instructions on cleaning and disinfecting a blood sugar monitor machine (glucometer). This failure had the potential for cross contamination of blood transmitted infections. During an interview on 01/08/26 at 11:30 a.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated the IPCP policies and procedures are online and that the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) was responsible for reviewing the IPCP Policies and Procedures (P&P). [...]
- D Keep all essential equipment working safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a patient care equipment, a glucometer (a device used for measuring the concentration of glucose in the blood for diabetics), was maintained in a safe operating condition. This failure had the potential to result in false blood sugar readings, compromising the health and well-being of residents.
January 10, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (referred to as Director of Dining Services (DDS)), albeit was a full time (FT) position, DDS was responsible for not only the main kitchen that provided foodservice for the residents residing in the Health Center (skilled nursing facility), but also responsible for two other foodservice operations located on the Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) campus, community Meals on Wheels, and providing food for another contracted small health facility. DDS failed to demonstrate appropriate skill set related to sufficient managerial monitoring and guidance related to: 1a. [...]
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service when: 1. TCS foods (Time Temperature Control for Safety - food that requires time-temperature control to prevent the growth of bacteria) were not consistently and accurately cooled down to ensure food safety. 2. The ice machine, located in a pantry near a nursing station, utilized for residents was not maintained in a sanitary condition. 3. There were unsanitary conditions in the main kitchen related to: 3a. Kitchen floors with build -up of dried food debris. 3b. Floor drains with build- up of dried food debris. 3c. Clean equipment stored on unclean shelves. 4. There was a container of cooked pasta in the walk-in refrigerator in the main kitchen that was not dated. 5. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Emergency Drug Supply Kit (E-kit) was stocked accurately according to the table of contents. This failure had the potential for residents not to receive necessary medications in case of emergency.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Expired items in the medication storage room, medication cart, and treatment cart were discarded and not readily available for staff use. 2. A work order was done when the temperature of the medication refrigerator was below acceptable range. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired and ineffective medications.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu for the therapeutic Mechanical [Mech] Soft Chopped (Level 6) [Level 6 - Soft & Bite-Sized (SB6)] diet (SB6 diet; food may be used when not able to bite off pieces of food safely but are able to chew bite-sized pieces down into little pieces that are safe to swallow) was developed and prepared in accordance with established national guidelines, IDDSI (International Dysphagia [difficulty swallowing] Diet Standardization Initiative), when the facility's menu modified the Level 6/SB 6 framework by incorporating unsafe foods based on an out-of-date Mech Soft Chopped diet from an obsolete National Dysphagia Diet (NDD). There were seven residents residing at the facility with a Mech [mechanical] Soft diet order that were provided Mech Soft Chopped (Level 6) menus as follows: [...]
October 21, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented pain assessment and management based on Resident 1's care plan after a surgical procedure. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have extended and unrelieved pain.
August 27, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement it's policy and procedure, on Handling Controlled Substance, ( prescribed , monitored, controlled narcotics) during discharge of one of two residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 was discharged with the medication Norco, which the resident found to be missing, from his discharged paper works and belongings . Resident then informed and notified the facility . This failure had the potential for drug diversion ( medication used by others aside from the patient ), placing the resident at risk for unaddressed pain with no relief.
July 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was wearing a gait belt (a device that helps prevent falls) at time of fall, during Resident 1's initial occupational therapy evaluation. This facility failure had the potential to create an unsafe environment for Resident 1.
May 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate it implemented individualized care planned interventions for monitoring and recording pain characteristics, for two of two sampled Residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This facility failure had the potential for nursing staff to inadequately capture and report to the full extent, Resident 1 and Resident 2's self-reported pain.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to properly secure 60 oxycodone tablets (a Schedule II drug used to treat moderate to severe pain with a high potential for abuse, with use potentially leading to severe psychological or physical dependence) upon delivery from the pharmacy. This facility failure resulted in the facility not being able to account for where the 60 oxycodone tablets went and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's pain management treatment.
March 1, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a follow up/new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR -mental disability assessment ) for Level 1 was done for one of 26 residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 not being adequately assessed and followed for mental health screening post admission.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for three out of 26 sampled residents (Residents 35, 16, and 198) when: 1. Interventions for Resident 35 who had depression (a common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think, and how you act, causes feelings of sadness and/or loss of interest in activities you once enjoyed) were not followed and implemented. 2. Resident 16's care plan interventions for depression were not followed. 3. No care plan was developed for Resident 198, who was on contact precautions (everyone coming into a patient's room is asked to wear a gown and gloves prior to patient contact). [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were no expired medications. This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving expired medications.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policies and procedures (P&P) on food storage, sanitation of food-contact surfaces when: 1. a) Unlabeled foods were found in dry storage b) Expired food found in walk-in refrigerator 2. Dietary staff failed to demonstrate the correct procedure in testing the concentration level of the sanitizer solution used to sanitize food- contact surfaces. These failures had the potential for expired food to be served to residents and food prepared on unsanitized surfaces, which could contribute to serious food-borne illnesses.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two out of 26 sampled residents (Resident 23 and 32): 1. Resident 23's care plan on depression was revised and updated to reflect medication discontinuance when the use of the antidepressant medication (Remeron /Mirtazapine-use to treat feelings of sadness, loss of interest in activities and ADLS, ) was discontinued. This failure had the risk of inaccurate information regarding the use of Remeron on the resident. 2. Resident 23's care plan on weight loss was revised and updated when the resident gained weight. This failure placed Resident 23 at risk for wrong body weight calculation which can affect overall nutritional needs. 3. Resident 23's Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) exercises were documented as rendered, not rendered, and the reason not rendered. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection prevention and control practices were met when: 1) A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) was observed without an isolation gown on as personal protective equipment (PPE- disposable gowns, gloves, eye wear, shoe wear mask usage to prevent spread of infection), while taking vital signs on a resident (Resident 198), who was on contact precautions. 2) A housekeeping staff (HS 1) was observed collecting trash bags without gloves on. These failures had the potential for the spread of infection among residents, staff, and visitors.
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe water delivery when water delivery logs on Legionella (bacteria that can cause a serious type of pneumonia [lung infection]) testing was with missing/incomplete documentation. This failure placed the facility's water delivery at risk for potential spread of Legionella.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 9, 2026, 4 on January 10, 2025, 4 on March 1, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.79 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.15 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.60 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.58 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 25.7% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 16.7% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.44 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.04 on weekdays and 4.15 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.83 in April to June 2025 to 4.79 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.79 | 0.61 | 5.04 | 4.15 | 9.0% | 3 of 90 | 56 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.87 | 0.67 | 5.19 | 4.06 | 10.2% | 3 of 92 | 57 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.69 | 0.72 | 5.04 | 3.79 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 56 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.83 | 0.73 | 5.14 | 4.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 56 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.8 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.7 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.6 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.1 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.4 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: HUMANGOOD NORCAL. CMS links this home to Humangood, a group of 17 nursing homes averaging 4.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humangood Norcal | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/31/1967 |
| Humangood | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2016 |
| Us Bank, N.a. | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 04/02/2018 | |
| Baker, Judith | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2016 | |
| Battison, William | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2016 | |
| Brown, Herman | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2016 | |
| Christopherson, Joanne | Corporate director | Individual | 03/20/2025 | |
| Feller, Irene | Corporate director | Individual | 01/26/2021 | |
| Griffith, Alan | Corporate director | Individual | 06/30/2019 | |
| Holmes, Michelle | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2016 | |
| Kelley, Albert | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2016 | |
| Vangelisto, Gwen | Corporate director | Individual | 08/28/2021 | |
| Cochrane, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/10/2009 | |
| Ghassemi, Bethany | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/28/2019 | |
| McDonald, Andrew | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Ogus, Daniel | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/17/1995 | |
| Humangood Norcal | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/31/1967 | |
| Humangood Socal | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/12/1993 | |
| Baker, Judith | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2016 | |
| Battison, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2016 | |
| Bordofsky, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/19/2022 | |
| Brown, Herman | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/10/2013 | |
| Christopherson, Joanne | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/20/2025 | |
| Cochrane, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/10/2009 | |
| Fairley, Tracie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2026 | |
| Feller, Irene | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/26/2021 | |
| Ghassemi, Bethany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/21/2019 | |
| Griffith, Alan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/30/2019 | |
| Hansen, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/08/2025 | |
| Henderson, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/12/2025 | |
| Holland, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Holmes, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2016 | |
| Kelley, Albert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2016 | |
| McDonald, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Ogus, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/17/1995 | |
| Vangelisto, Gwen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/30/2021 | |
| Humangood Norcal | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/31/1967 | |
| Humangood Socal | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/12/1993 | |
| Pharmerica Drug Systems LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/02/2017 | |
| Us Bank, N.a. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Bordofsky, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/19/2022 | |
| Brown, Herman | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2013 | |
| Cochrane, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/10/2009 | |
| Fairley, Tracie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2026 | |
| Hansen, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/08/2025 | |
| Henderson, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/12/2025 | |
| McDonald, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Vangelisto, Gwen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/30/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 10, 2025: "Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 10, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 29, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Mission Park Healthcare Center Santa Barbara, 1.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Samarkand Skilled Nursing Facility Santa Barbara, 1.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Channel Islands Post Acute Santa Barbara, 1.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- The Californian Santa Barbara, 1.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Buena Vista Care Center Santa Barbara, 3.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Casa Dorinda Santa Barbara, 6.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 31 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Valle Verde Health Facility's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Valle Verde Health Facility 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Valle Verde Health Facility get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 9, 2026. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Valle Verde Health Facility been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Valle Verde Health Facility accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Valle Verde Health Facility?
- CMS lists 48 owners and managers, and links the home to Humangood. Legal business name: HUMANGOOD NORCAL.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.