Home / California / Santa Barbara
The Californian
2225 De La Vina Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 · Santa Barbara County · (805) 682-1355
68 certified beds, about 48 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055684 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 28, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 15 health citations since July 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.36 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.51 of those hours.
60.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
March 28, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for the use of the anticoagulant medication Apixaban (a medication that helps prevent blood clots) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 39). This failure could result in medication related adverse events and poor management of anticoagulation therapy for Resident 39.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for two of two unsampled residents (Residents 29 and 14) when: 1. Resident 29's apical pulse (AP - heartbeat that is felt or heard at the apex [top] of the heart, located on the left side of the chest) rate was not checked, as ordered, prior to receiving a blood pressure medication. 2. Resident 14's medical record had no documented intervention, as ordered, during two episodes when the resident had alarmingly low blood sugar readings. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 29 and 14 not receiving the appropriate care and services which can affect their health and safety.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing for one of two sampled residents (Resident 98) was labeled and dated. This failure had the potential to result in cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria) for residents in an already compromised condition.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen and food storage sanitation was maintained when: 1. Kitchen staff personal belongings (i.e., jacket and purse) were found inside the dry food storage room. 2. The low-temperature dish machine was operating without proper chemical sanitation. These failures increased the risk of food-borne illnesses to its vulnerable residents as a result of potential food contamination and improperly sanitized dishware.
January 12, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the completed MDS (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents of long-term care health facilities) discharge assessments for two of two sampled residents (Residents 11 and 33) were submitted in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to result in resident data inaccuracies which could affect the facility's improvement efforts to provide high quality care to its residents.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Develop a person-centered interdisciplinary team nutrition care plan (IDTNCP - detailed plans of care created by representatives from several medical disciplines or specialties) for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 37) to include the resident's goals and desired outcomes. In addition, the IDTNCP lacked clear and specific measurable objectives and physician input, related to a planned weight gain for Resident 37. This failure resulted in unclear measurable weight gain goal and impedes the IDT from effectively monitoring, evaluating and revising the care plan, as appropriate, to ensure care needs would not go unrecognized and unmet. 2. Develop a care plan for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 35) receiving blood thinners. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain and provide a prescribed, routine antihypertensive medication (a medication used to lower blood pressure) ordered for one of three sampled residents (Resident 40). This failure had the potential to result in uncontrolled blood pressure levels and subsequent complications for Resident 40.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities during the medication regimen review (MRR) when nonpharmacological interventions (NPI) were not implemented for the behaviors exhibited for depression and psychosis for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 34) This failure had the potential to result in Resident 34 receiving unnecessary medications.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate during medication pass observation was less than five percent (5%). The facility had a cumulative medication error rate of 10.34% when three errors out of 29 opportunities for errors were observed between two licensed nurses (LN 2 and LN 4) who administered medication to two sampled residents (Residents 25 & 40) and one unsampled resident (Resident 547). The observed medication administration errors were: 1. LN 4 administered one capsule of Urox (a medication that supports bladder control) by mouth to Resident 25 instead of the prescribed order of two capsules. 2. LN 2 failed to administer the full dose of Clearlax (a laxative to treat occasional constipation) mixed in apple juice to Resident 547 when half of the mixture was thrown away. 3. [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and medical supplies were discarded and not readily available for staff use. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe medication administration or ineffective therapy provided to the residents.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling when puree chicken, a TCS food (Time-Temperature Control for Safety - food that requires time-temperature control to prevent the growth of bacteria), was not accurately cooled down. As a result, the residents who were scheduled to be served the planned alternate entrée of puree chicken, in lieu of the main entrée of puree fish, were placed at an increased risk for developing a foodborne illness.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of non-pharmacological interventions (NPI - any intervention intended to improve the health or the well-being of individuals that do not involve the use of drugs or medicine) for the use of psychotropic medications (medications used for mood and behavior modification) in one of three sampled residents (Resident 34) was in place. Resident 34 was placed on Prozac (medication to treat depression) and Seroquel (medication to regulate mood, behaviors and thoughts) with no documented NPIs. This failure had the potential to result in incomplete data used as basis for possible continued or discontinued use of psychotropic medication usage on Resident 34 and other residents.
July 22, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 45) was not prescribed a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (drugs used to treat mental illness) past 14 days, without a rationale for continuation for its use. This failure placed Resident 45 at risk for receiving an unnecessary psychotropic medication.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals (medications made from living cells) were labeled correctly when two bottles of Vitamin C supplements had torn off expiration dates and three bottles of Glucerna Shakes (protein supplement) were expired. This failure had the potential to expose residents to expired medications with questionable effectiveness.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a care directive during life threatening situations) and/or the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) orders were reflected of the residents' or responsible parties (RP) wishes for two of 16 sampled residents (Resident 26 and Resident 37) when: 1. Resident 26's POLST did not match the EMR medical doctor (MD) order. 2. Resident 37's POLST was not signed by the appointed RP/health care decision-maker. These failures had the potential to cause a delay or violate resident's rights, as to wishes on administering life-sustaining treatments during an emergency.
Fire safety inspections
8 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 28, 2025, 2 on January 12, 2024, 4 on July 22, 2022.
Every fire safety citation8 citations
- F Properly install and monitor supervisory attachments on automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Have a complete alarm system manually initiated and initiated by fire sprinkler system connection.
- D Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.36 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.71 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.71 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.14 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.0% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.30 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.62 on weekdays and 3.71 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.77 in April to June 2025 to 4.36 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.51 | 4.62 | 3.71 | 4.9% | 0 of 90 | 48 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.12 | 0.44 | 3.23 | 2.85 | 8.1% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.15 | 0.39 | 4.34 | 3.67 | 7.1% | 0 of 92 | 52 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.77 | 0.72 | 5.11 | 3.92 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 47 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.2 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.6 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.3 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.9 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.4 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CALIFORNIA CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL OF SANTA BARBARA, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson, Haley | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 06/01/2013 |
| Anderson, Haley | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2013 | |
| Lopez, Edgar | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/17/2012 | |
| White, Anne | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/25/2022 | |
| Lopez, Edgar | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/17/2012 | |
| White, Anne | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/25/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 28, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on January 12, 2024: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 28, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 28, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.71 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Samarkand Skilled Nursing Facility Santa Barbara, 0.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Mission Park Healthcare Center Santa Barbara, 0.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Valle Verde Health Facility Santa Barbara, 1.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Channel Islands Post Acute Santa Barbara, 1.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Casa Dorinda Santa Barbara, 4.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Buena Vista Care Center Santa Barbara, 5.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is The Californian's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates The Californian 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did The Californian get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 28, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has The Californian been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does The Californian accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns The Californian?
- CMS lists 6 owners and managers. Legal business name: CALIFORNIA CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL OF SANTA BARBARA, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.