Find a nursing home

Home / Mississippi / Ruleville

Walter B Crook Nursing Facility

840 North Oak Avenue, Ruleville, MS 38771 · Sunflower County · (662) 756-2711

60 certified beds, about 56 residents a day · Government - State · Medicaid since 2017

Inside a hospital Certified for Medicaid
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 25A422 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on November 13, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

Of 14 health citations since December 2022, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.80 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.57 of those hours.

27.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
3G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
0E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
2B
0C
November 13, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify, accurately assess, document, and implement treatment for a pressure injury for one (1) of 55 residents. This failure resulted in an avoidable full-thickness tissue loss wound not being treated after identification for ten (10) days because the physician order was not implemented for Resident #5. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Wound Care Policy and Protocol dated 1/24/25, revealed under, 2. Policy Statement: Proper name of the facility is committed to 1. Proactive wound prevention through comprehensive assessments. 2. Prompt identification and treatment of wounds. 3. Use of advanced wound care techniques. 4. Minimizing infection risks through proper dressing techniques. 5. Educating staff and residents on wound prevention and care. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (1) of 16 MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident #6) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Assessments and the Care Delivery Process with revised date 12/2016, revealed, Comprehensive assessments will be conducted to .Define current treatments and services . Record review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 10/14/25, noted that Section N - Medications, N0350 revealed the resident had received insulin injections for one (1) day during the last seven (7) days. [...]
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care that included nail care for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for two (2) of 16 sampled residents, (Resident #8 and #46); and failed to implement comprehensive care plans for two (2) of 16 sampled residents. (Resident #2 and #7) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of December 2016, revealed under Policy Statement .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . Resident #2 and Resident #7 Record review of Resident #2's Care Plans revealed under, Focus: [...]
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide proper nail care for two (2) of sixteen 16 sampled residents. (Resident #8 and #46) Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, Supporting revised March 2018, revealed .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living revealed under Fingernails/Toenails, Care of with a revision date of February 2018 states, The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. [...]
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide bowel and bladder training services to reduce incontinence for one (1) of 16 sampled residents. (Resident #10)
  6. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medications for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #2 and #7 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use revised 12/16, revealed under, Policy Statement: Antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed. Also revealed under, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 17. Nursing staff shall monitor for and report any of the following side effects and adverse consequences of antipsychotic medications to the attending physician . [...]
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained for two (1) of three (3) care opportunities. (Resident #13)
February 28, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to promote the healing of existing pressure injuries as evidenced by failure to perform hand hygiene during wound care. Resident #34 currently has a foul odor and purulent discharge to facility acquired pressure wounds of the right lower leg and right heel with a history of recent multiple pressure ulcer infections. Resident #42 has two (2) facility acquired pressure ulcers with a history of pressure ulcer infection. This is for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident #34 and Resident #42).
  2. G
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during wound care, Foley and suprapubic catheter care, and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube care (Resident's #34 and #42) Resident #34 currently has a foul odor and purulent discharge from facility acquired pressure wounds of the right lower leg and right heel with a history of recent multiple pressure ulcer infections. Resident #42 has two (2) facility acquired pressure ulcers with a history of pressure ulcer infection. This is for two (2) of 10 residents observed during direct patient care. Resident's #34 and 42 Cross reference F686
  3. B
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to complete and submit a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment timely in accordance with the current federal and state submission timeframes for one (1) of 18 resident's MDS assessments reviewed.
  4. B
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflects the resident's status when the Discharge MDS was inaccurately coded for (1) one of 18 MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident #62)
December 8, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 9, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, facility policy review and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from physical restraints for one (1) of 20 residents reviewed during the survey.
  2. D
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 9, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, within 120 days, for 1 of 20 residents reviewed in the sample for MDS Assessments. Resident #38 FACILITY Resident Assessment Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessments, revised November 2019, revealed Policy Statement, A comprehensive assessment of every resident's needs is made at intervals designated by OBRA and PPS requirements. 2. Quarterly Assessment - Conducted not less frequently than three (3) months following the most recent OBRA assessment of any type. An interview on 12/07/22 at 01:30 PM with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse revealed she neglected to open the Quarterly MDS Assessment for the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 10/18/22 for Resident #38. [...]
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 9, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plans for the use of side rails for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for side rails.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on December 8, 2022.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · December 8, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.804.183.86
Registered nurses0.570.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.273.503.42
Nurse aides2.91
Licensed practical nurses1.32
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)27.0%45.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover0.0%38.5%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.01 on weekdays and 4.27 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 74.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.34 in April to June 2025 to 4.80 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.800.575.014.27 74.4%0 of 9056
Oct to Dec 20255.200.715.524.39 70.6%1 of 9255
Jul to Sep 20255.720.716.064.86 70.4%0 of 9251
Apr to Jun 20255.340.725.734.39 67.7%0 of 9153
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Mississippi, Jan to Mar 20264.090.604.353.446.2%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
24.620.513.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.11.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.22.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.13.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.219.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.76.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.121.715.4

Owners and operators

Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ownership data not available

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on November 13, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 13, 2025: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 13, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on November 13, 2025: "Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Mississippi contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Walter B Crook Nursing Facility's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Walter B Crook Nursing Facility 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Walter B Crook Nursing Facility get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 13, 2025. The Mississippi average is 6.8.
Has Walter B Crook Nursing Facility been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Walter B Crook Nursing Facility accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Walter B Crook Nursing Facility?
CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection