Washington County Nursing Home
599 W Greenhouse Dr, Akron, CO 80720 · Washington County · (970) 345-2211
40 certified beds, about 39 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 065309 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 25, 2024, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Colorado average is 8.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 20 health citations since November 2019, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $24,668 in the last three years; the largest was $24,668, and the latest is dated September 25, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.31 hours per resident per day, against 3.72 across Colorado and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.70 of those hours.
42.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Colorado average 47.1%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
February 10, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of three sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Monitor Resident #1's blood sugar after long acting insulin was administered to ensure the effectiveness of the medication.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control and prevention program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices during insulin injection via insulin pen by using Resident #3 insulin pen to inject insulin to Resident #1.
September 25, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for three (#38, #24 and #3) of five residents reviewed for care plans out of 19 total sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #38 had a care plan for the use of an anticoagulant medication; -Ensure Resident #24 had a care plan for the use of supplemental oxygen; and, -Ensure Resident #3 had a care plan for the use of a diuretic medication.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced their dignity and respect for one (#35) of three residents reviewed for dignity out of 19 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #35's fall intervention sensor alarm was discussed with the resident on how it made her feel.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drug regimens were free from unnecessary medications for one (#38) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 19 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #38 was adequately monitored and side effects were documented for the use of an anticoagulant medication.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed proper infection control procedures for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).
May 17, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- G Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement appropriate nutritional interventions for one (#26) out of 20 sample residents to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Resident #26, age [AGE], was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease, history of falling and anxiety. Resident #26 sustained a weight loss of 10.6% (20.5 lbs) from admission on [DATE] through 1/31/23, which was considered significant. According to Resident #26's nutrition care plan, pertinent interventions initiated 3/4/23 included to monitor, record and report to the physician as needed any signs and symptoms of malnutrition such as significant weight loss and obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered. [...]
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, records review and interviews, the facility failed to adequately monitor the resident for unnecessary psychotropic medications needed to provide effective and person-centered care for one (#19) of five residents reviewed for use of psychotropic medication out of 20 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to for Resident #19: -Ensure staff monitored the resident for effectiveness of antidepressant medication therapy since the resident was prescribed two antidepressant medications with one being used for a diagnosis of insomnia; -Ensure staff identified depressive target behaviors; -Ensure staff accurately monitored the resident for depressive target behaviors and hours of sleep for the antidepressant being used for insomnia; and, -Ensure staff monitored the resident for her response to antidepressant medication.
November 21, 2019Standard inspection · 12 citations
- G Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure individuals with a finding entered into the State nurse registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of property for one of five sampled staff members. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from employee negligence by employing LPN #5 with a known history of negligence entered into the State nurse registry. Cross reference: F690 (Catheters), the facility failed to follow physician's orders for catheter placement resulting in harm to Resident #4.
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteII. The facility failed to ensure an RN assessment for injury was completed prior to moving a resident who had fallen A. Resident #36 1. Resident status Resident #36, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2019 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur, joint replacement surgery, dementia with behavioral disturbance and anxiety disorder. The 10/29/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of three out of 15. She required extensive assistance of two people with bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. It indicated the resident had a fracture related to a fall prior to the resident's readmission to the facility and had hip replacement surgery. 2. [...]
- G Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services for one resident (#4) of one with a suprapubic catheter with a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Insert the indwelling catheter into the superpubic area, for Resident #4. The indwelling catheter was wrongly inserted into the penis meatus which resulted in bleeding, bruising and pain (Cross Reference F 606 failure to not employ staff with a history of negligence).
- G Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews; the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one (#23) of two residents reviewed for nutrition out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, Resident #23, diagnosed with hypokalemia, anemia, hypocalcemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and hyperlipidemia. On 5/3/19 the resident's weight was recorded at 143.0 lbs (pounds) and six months later on 10/16/19 the resident weighed 125.0 lbs. This was a 17.5 lbs significant weight loss, which was 12.24% over six months. On 9/3/19 the resident weighed 141.3 lbs and 18 days later on 9/21/19 the resident weighed 129.5 lbs. This was an 11.8 lbs significant weight loss, which was 7.8%. On 9/21/19 the resident weighed 129.5 lbs and 26 days later on 10/16/19 the resident weighed 125.0 lbs. This was a 4.5 lbs and 3.8% weight loss. [...]
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and revise comprehensive care plans for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for four (#36, #12, #10, and #18) out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the care plan was revised and updated with fall interventions for Resident #36, #12, #10 and #18; -Ensure the care plan was revised and updated with Resident #10 current functional status, recent functional decline and newly developed pressure ulcers; and -Ensure the care plan was revised and updated following a suicidal ideation by Resident #10. [...]
- E Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that two (#3 and #6) out of two residents reviewed for oxygen out of 26 total sampled residents received necessary respiratory care and services. Specifically, Resident #3 and #6 were administered oxygen; however, the facility failed to have a physician's order for the resident's oxygen.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician notification for two (#10 and #23) out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of Resident #10's change of condition and Resident #23's weight loss. Cross reference: F657 (Care Plan Timing and Revision), the facility failed to ensure the care plan reflected the current activities of daily living (ADL) status of Resident #10 following a recent decline.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#88) of two out of 26 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #88 was kept free from abuse from a staff member.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged violation of abuse to the State survey and certification agency for one (#88) out of two residents reviewed for abuse out of 26 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an incident of physical abuse with Resident #88 by a staff member, which caused bruising and swelling to the resident's left forearm was reported immediately. Cross reference: F600 (Free from Abuse and Neglect), the facility failed to ensure Resident #88 was kept free from abuse from a staff member.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two residents (#3 and #6) out of 26 residents reviewed of 26 residents sampled. Specifically the facility failed to: - develop a care plan the use of oxygen and a (anticoagulant) blood thinner for Resident #3 and, - develop a care plan for the use of oxygen for Resident #6.
- D Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure qualified staff persons in accordance with each resident's written plan of care provided care for one (#12) of three residents reviewed for accidents out of xx sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to have a registered nurse (RN) assess Resident #12 following an unwitnessed fall.
- D Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#10) of three out of 26 sampled residents received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to assess Resident #10 following a suicidal ideation. Cross reference to F657 (Care Plan Timing and Revision) because the facility failed to ensure the care plan reflected Resident #10 suicidal ideation.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on September 25, 2024, 2 on May 17, 2023, 2 on November 21, 2019.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 25, 2024 | Fine | $24,668 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Colorado | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.31 | 3.72 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.70 | 0.82 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.09 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.82 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.78 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.6% | 47.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.0% | 44.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.02 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.40 on weekdays and 4.09 on weekends, 7% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.51 in April to June 2025 to 4.31 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.31 | 0.70 | 4.40 | 4.09 | 5.5% | 0 of 90 | 39 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.00 | 0.73 | 4.08 | 3.79 | 5.9% | 0 of 92 | 38 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.67 | 0.51 | 4.75 | 4.47 | 14.6% | 0 of 92 | 38 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.51 | 0.43 | 4.62 | 4.23 | 15.1% | 4 of 91 | 40 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Colorado, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.59 | 0.76 | 3.75 | 3.18 | 5.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Colorado | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.3 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 13.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.1 | 20.0 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: WASHINGTON COUNTY NURSING HOME.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington County Colorado | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2010 | |
| Foy, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/2005 | |
| Hart, Terry | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/11/2011 | |
| Laybourn, Lea | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/13/2009 | |
| Washington County Colorado | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2010 | |
| Washington County Nursing Home | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2010 | |
| Schuetz, Libbie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2022 | |
| Schuetz, Libbie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on February 10, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 25, 2024: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2019: "Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 10, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Colorado contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Colorado. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Health Facilities and Emergency Medical Services Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Colorado State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 303-862-3524. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Find and compare facilities, where Colorado publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Washington County Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Washington County Nursing Home 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Washington County Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 25, 2024. The Colorado average is 8.7.
- Has Washington County Nursing Home been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $24,668 in the last three years.
- Does Washington County Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Washington County Nursing Home?
- CMS lists 8 owners and managers. Legal business name: WASHINGTON COUNTY NURSING HOME.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.