703 17th Street Northwest, Aliceville, AL 35442 · Pickens County · (205) 373-6307
100 certified beds, about 93 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1977
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 015137 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 27, 2023, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Alabama average is 4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 8 health citations since August 2018 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.88 hours per resident per day, against 3.88 across Alabama and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.66 of those hours.
38.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Alabama average 46.9%).
CMS links it to Trinity Management, Inc., an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory care, specifically the provision of oxygen therapy at prescribed rate, was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, a facility policies titled, Resource: Taking Accurate Temperatures, and Food Safety and Sanitation, the facility failed to ensure: 1. staff wore hair nets while in the kitchen and 2. staff took the temperatures of all foods on the tray line. This had the potential to affect 73 of 73 residents receiving meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and a facility policy titled, Nursing Comprehensive Care Plan (Developing) , the facility failed to ensure that Resident Identifier (RI) #58 had a baseline care plan within 48 hours. This affected 1 of 19 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1) crumbs and spots were not in the mixer bowl that was covered and stored for future use; 2) plates were not wet nesting in the plate warmer and; 3) the temperature of the milk at the lunch meal was taken. This had the potential to affect 77 of 77 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1) On 8/21/2018 at 12:09 p.m., the mixer was wrapped for storage in plastic and four spots were noted in the bottom of the mixer bowl. There was food particle/crumbs on the top area of the mixer probe. On 8/23/18 at 9:34 a.m., an interview was conducted with EI #10, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). EI #10 was asked what was covered and wrapped in plastic covering for future use. EI #10 replied, the floor mixer. EI #10 was asked what was in the mixer bowl and on the probe at the top of the mixer. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Dementia Unit dining area floor was free of brown stains. The facility further failed to ensure water did not drip from condensation collected at the air conditioner vent onto the hallway floor and ceiling tiles were also free from brown stains. This affected the Dementia Unit dining room and one of two hallways outside of two resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifiers (RI) #'s 27, 29, 49, 51, 83 and 334 were free of neglect, as reported by the facility to the State Agency on 8/10/18. This affected six of six residents reported as neglected by staff. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report AL00035830. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy ABUSE, with a last revised date of 03/17, revealed: Policy Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, . A review of an Online Incident Report submitted by the facility on 8/10/2018 at 5:22 PM revealed: .Incident Type .Neglect .7) . Residents involved were RI #51, RI #334, RI #27, RI #83. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #7, Licensed Practical Nurse, did not place the cap from the eye drop medication bottle on Resident Identifier (RI) #48's over the bed table, then return the cap to the bottle after instilling the drops. This affected one of five nurses observed during medication pass. Findings Include: RI #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Keratoconjunctive Sicca, bilateral and Dry Eye Syndrome. A review of RI #48's August Physician Orders revealed: .LEXAPRO .ZOCOR .CALCIUM .SYSTANE OPHTH (Opthalmic) EYE GTTS (drops) 1 GTT OU (both eyes) BID (two times a day) . On 8/22/18 at 9:13 AM EI #7 was observed giving RI #48's scheduled medication. EI #7 prepared the medications and entered the room. EI #7 gave the by mouth medications then washed her hands and put on gloves. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and a review of a facility policy titled, Dispose of Garbage and Refuse the facility failed to ensure the dumpster lid was closed, free of debris on top of the lid, around the dumpster and free of a foul odor. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing at the facility. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Dispose of Garbage and Refuse with a date of 8/2017 revealed: Policy Statement .Procedures 1. The Dining Services Director coordinates with the Director of Maintenance to ensure the area surrounding the exterior dumpster area is maintained in a manner free of rubbish or debris. On 8/21/18 at 11:52 a.m., the surveyor along with the CDM/ EI #10 toured the dumpster area. The surveyor observed trash hanging out of the dumpster. When facing the dumpster, one lid was opened all the way on the back side. [...]
13 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 27, 2023, 6 on September 26, 2019, 4 on August 23, 2018.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Alabama | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.88 | 3.88 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.34 | 3.26 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.60 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.62 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.3% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 39.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.17 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.10 on weekdays and 3.34 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.92 in April to June 2025 to 3.88 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.66 | 4.10 | 3.34 | 6.4% | 0 of 90 | 93 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.87 | 0.74 | 4.08 | 3.33 | 3.5% | 0 of 92 | 90 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.13 | 0.79 | 4.35 | 3.56 | 7.8% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.92 | 0.81 | 4.16 | 3.30 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 83 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Alabama, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.63 | 4.13 | 3.27 | 0.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $16.41 | $14.45 to $17.49 | 25,250 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.42 | $23.15 to $29.71 | 11,580 |
| Registered nurses | $37.06 | $30.53 to $40.09 | 54,340 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Alabama | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 12.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 12.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.6 | 21.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.6 | 24.8 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.2 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Aliceville Manor Nursing Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Alabama: 41 better, 10 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Alabama: 1 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
6.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Alabama: 0 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Alabama50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Alabama0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Alabama2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Alabama100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ALICEVILLE MANOR NURSING HOME, INC. CMS links this home to Trinity Management, Inc., a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sims, Mark | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Sims, Mark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Sims, Mark | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Sims, Mark | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Reynolds, Joy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2020 | |
| Richardson, Harry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Quality Care Rehab Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/10/2023 | |
| Trintiy Management Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/08/2025 | |
| Richardson, Harry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/08/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Alabama. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.