1316 S Florida, Borger, TX 79007 · Hutchinson County · (806) 273-3785
110 certified beds, about 25 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455989 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 12, 2025, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 32 health citations since June 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $40,307 in the last three years; the largest was $26,910, and the latest is dated August 27, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.19 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
60.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Avir Health Group, an affiliated group of 118 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #14) of 12 residents reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14 did not have mouth pain from at least March of 2025 to August of 2025. This failure could place residents at risk of living for extended periods of time with unaddressed pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure stored food was properly labelled and dated. The facility failed to ensure dented cans were placed in the specified area to be returned. The facility failed to discard leftover food by use by date on the label. The facility failed to ensure the floor, walls, trashcan, and bathroom of the kitchen were clean and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure food was stored at least 6 inches off the floor. These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 (Resident #2, Resident #8, and Resident #14) of 12 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessment.1. The facility failed to accurately code Resident #2's oxygen therapy status.2. The facility failed to accurately code Resident #8's tobacco use status.3. The facility failed to accurately code Resident #14's dental status. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and/or consideration. Findings Included:1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #29) of 12 residents reviewed for resident rights. Resident #29 was observed with her catheter bag not in a privacy bag. This failure could place resident at risk for feeling uncomfortable, disrespected, and embarrassed leading to isolation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 1 (Resident #10) of 12 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Resident #10 had a DNR in her record that was missing the date when the physician signed the form. The facility's failure could place residents a risk for not receiving healthcare as per their or their legal representatives wishes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and clean environment for 1 (Resident #9) of 12 residents reviewed for environment. -Resident #9 had a dining tray left in his room for 18 hours. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition for 1 (Resident #7) of 12 residents reviewed for timing of assessments. The facility failed to complete Resident #7's significant change MDS within 14 days of his admission to hospice care on 03/01/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care/coordination of care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights and that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #14) of 12 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.1. The facility failed to include Resident #14's mouth pain and need for oral surgery in her care plan. This failure could lead to residents not receiving needed care and/or receiving improper care/treatment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #2 and #15) of 12 residents reviewed for respiratory care. -Resident #2 did not have orders for her oxygen therapy. -Resident #15 was not receiving oxygen at the correct dose. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk for respiratory compromise and associated complications such as shortness of breath, confusion, respiratory failure, infection, and exacerbation of their condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide or obtain from an outside resource, the following dental services to meet the needs of each resident: (i) Routine dental services (to the extent covered under the State plan); and (ii) Emergency dental services for 1 (Resident #14) of 12 residents reviewed for dental issues. The facility failed to obtain oral surgery for Resident #14 timely. This failure could place residents at risk of exacerbated dental issues and/or pain. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 (Resident #13) of 12 residents reviewed for dietary needs. The facility failed to prepare Resident #13's pureed diet appropriately. This failure could place residents at risk of aspiration, choking, and/or weight loss. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents observed for infection control practices. The DON did not wear a gown when performing wound care for Resident #5. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and that the resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards. CNA A failed to use a transfer belt while attempting to transfer Resident #1 from the bed to the wheelchair. This failure could place residents at risk of unsafe transfers, resulting in falls, injuries, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 (Resident #19 and #89) of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care in that: Resident #19 was observed several times with his catheter bag not in a privacy bag. Resident #89 was observed several times with his catheter bag not in a privacy bag. This failure could cause residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected leading to feeling of isolation and deterioration in general health conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of for 4 of 9 anonymous residents observed for 3 of 3 days and reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure activities provided met residents' needs or desires. These failures could place residents at risk of boredom and a decline in their quality of life.
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to ensure stored food was properly labeled and dated. This failure could put place Residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings Included: Observation of pantry #1 on 7/22/24 at 9:17 am revealed 1 bag of ground cinnamon with no date. Observation of pantry #1 on 7/22/24 at 9:18 am revealed 1 large container of food thickener with a date of 10/25/22. Observation of pantry #1 on 7/22/24 at 11:08 am revealed 1 box of chili mix with no date. Observation of pantry #1 on 7/22/24 at 11:08 am revealed 2 bags of turkey gravy with no date. Observation of kitchen counter on 7/22/24 at 9:30 am revealed 3 containers of cereal with no label or date. Observation of refrigerator #2 on 7/22/24 at 9:23 am revealed 1 bag of sliced watermelon with no label or date. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws in locked compartments for 1 (600 hall cart) of 1 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to lock the medication cart on hall 600. This failure could place residents at risk for obtaining medications not prescribed to them and experiencing adverse reactions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse and/or neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Observation revealed Resident #1's bed was saturated with urine. This failure could affect residents resulting in physical or emotional harm resulting in in deterioration in their health condition, need for medical treatment, physical impairment, exacerbation of their condition, serious bodily harm, emotional distress, and feelings of isolation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, administering, and documentation of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 out of 8 residents (Residents #2) whose medical records were reviewed for medication administration, in that: LVN C administered medication to Resident #2 via nebulizer and left Resident #2 unattended. These deficient practices can affect residents that receive medications resulting in adverse reactions to medication, deterioration in their health, exacerbation of their disease process, and/or hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communication diseases and infections for 2 of 8 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) Residents reviewed for infection control, in that: -CNA A and CNA B failed to use proper hand hygiene during incontinent care of Resident #1. -CNA B failed to use proper hand hygiene during toileting of Resident #3. These failures had the potential to affect residents in the facility by placing them at risk of contracting, spreading, and/or exposing them to bacterial or viral infections that could lead to the spread of communicable diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The facility failed to ensure a 15 ml bottle of morphine prescribed to Resident #1 was not misappropriated. This failure could lead to residents not receiving their medication as prescribed and/or experiencing discomfort due to symptoms not being treated as ordered by a physician. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involved abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin (bruising to Resident #2's chest) to the administrator and to the state within 24 hours. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws in locked compartments for 1 (200 hall cart) of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to lock the medication cart in hall 200. This failure could place residents at risk for obtaining medications not prescribed to them and experiencing adverse reactions. Findings Included: During an observation on 04/24/24 at 08:49 PM the medication cart in hall 200 was unlocked. All three drawers were easily opened and full of medications. The double locked drawers to the right of the medication cart were unlocked on the first lock but the second lock of each drawer was still locked. A resident was awake and seated in his recliner in his room in line of sight of the medication cart. No staff members were in sight. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reportable incidents. On 3/2/2024, Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall with a laceration on the head requiring staples and the facility failed to report it to State Agency. This failure can result in physical or mental harm, physical or mental decline, and continued patient neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 7 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7) of 40 residents observed for personal privacy and confidentiality in that: RN A did not lock the nurse's station computer that contained sensitive resident information such as medication administered, name, room numbers, and advance directives for Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5,#6 and #7. This failure could place residents at risk for having their personal and medical information exposed. Findings Included: An observation on 1/17/24 at 1:18 PM revealed a medication cart at the nurse's station with the computer on and unlocked. On the screen was Resident #1's personal information including name, date of birth , medication administered, and code status. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents are free from accidents and hazards for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. LVN A failed to prevent accidents and hazards with Resident #1 from injury and harm by not following mechanical lift standards of a two person assist resulting in severe injuries of a 10+ centimeter laceration on the head revealing skull, a laceration on the hand, and a fractured C1 vertebrae. This failure could affect residents at the facility by placing them at risk for accidents that lead to injuries such as bruising, skin tears, fractures, subdural hematomas, and death. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/07/2023 at 2:43 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide quality care to 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for mechanical lifts. The facility failed to provide or confirm training for LVN A on proper use of mechanical lifts. This failure can place residents at risk of physical or psychosocial harm, severe injury, or death while receiving care at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 21 (4-2-2023, 4-9-2023, 4-16-2023, 4-23-2023, 4-30-2023, 5-7-2023, 5-14-2023, 5-15-2023, 5-16-2023, 5-17-2023, 5-18-2023, 5-19-2023, 5-21-2023, 5-22-2023, 5-23-2023, 5-26-2023, 5-28-2023, 5-29-2023, 6-1-2023, 6-2-2023, and 6-4-2023) of the last 90 days reviewed. The facility did not have an RN working in the facility for 21 (4-2-2023, 4-9-2023, 4-16-2023, 4-23-2023, 4-30-2023, 5-7-2023, 5-14-2023, 5-15-2023, 5-16-2023, 5-17-2023, 5-18-2023, 5-19-2023, 5-21-2023, 5-22-2023, 5-23-2023, 5-26-2023, 5-28-2023, 5-29-2023, 6-1-2023, 6-2-2023, and 6-4-2023) of the last 90 days reviewed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 (Resident #2, #14, and #18) of 12 Residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. -The facility failed to include care plans for Resident #2's correct code status (Advanced Directive) and for her hospice care. -The facility failed to include care plans for Resident #14's correct code status (Advanced Directive). -The facility failed to include care plans for Resident #18's hospice care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communication diseases and infections for 4 (#13, #11, #29, and #21) of 25 Residents. LVN A failed to use proper hand hygiene techniques when preparing and administering medications to Residents. These failures had the potential to affect all residents in the facility by placing them at risk of contracting, spreading, and/or exposing them to bacterial or viral infections that could lead to the spread of communicable diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review; it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles to include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable on 1 of 1 medication cart. 1 bottle of expired medication was found in medication cart. The facility's failure to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable could place all residents receiving medication at risk for drug diversion, drug overdose, and accidental or intentional administration to the wrong resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review; it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles to include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable on 1 of 1 medication cart. 1 loose pill (small round white pill with TV on one side and 2204 on the other side of pill) was found in the medication cart and 1 loose pill (large white pill no identifiable markings on either side of pill) was found on the floor outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] of the facility. [...]
3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on September 12, 2025, 1 on July 24, 2024, 1 on June 7, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 27, 2025 | Fine | $26,910 |
| August 27, 2025 | Payment Denial | 1 days from October 8, 2025 |
| November 8, 2023 | Fine | $13,397 |
| November 8, 2023 | Payment Denial | 6 days from December 6, 2023 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.19 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.93 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.86 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.78 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.7% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 2.94 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.29 on weekdays and 2.93 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 14.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.17 in April to June 2025 to 3.19 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.19 | 0.55 | 3.29 | 2.93 | 14.5% | 0 of 90 | 25 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.06 | 0.35 | 3.12 | 2.89 | 9.2% | 3 of 92 | 25 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.13 | 0.50 | 3.27 | 2.77 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 24 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.17 | 0.44 | 3.36 | 2.69 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 28 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.4 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Avir at Borger's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 30 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: STRATFORD HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Avir Health Group, a group of 118 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stratford Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2023 |
| Chumley, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| 1316 S Florida St. Opco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2025 | |
| Freund, Nochum | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Travitsky, Aaron | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Dagan, Amitai | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 01/29/2026 | |
| Goldberger, Abraham | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 01/29/2026 | |
| Goldberger, Faigy | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 01/29/2026 | |
| 1316 S Florida St. Opco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/28/2026 | |
| Welltower Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2025 | |
| Welltower Nnn Group, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2025 | |
| Welltower Op, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2025 | |
| Akins, Jamelyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Rankin, Ron | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.