What is Bath Creek Estates's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Bath Creek Estates 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Bath Creek Estates get at its last inspection?

1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on December 21, 2023. The Ohio average is 10.5.

Has Bath Creek Estates been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Bath Creek Estates accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Bath Creek Estates?

CMS lists 25 owners and managers, and links the home to Saber Healthcare Group. Legal business name: BATH CREEK HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.

Bath Creek Estates: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 21, 2023, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since February 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.62 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.

54.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).

CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

102/19

305/21

109/23

112/23

301/25

503/25

111/25

103/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

13D

Potential for minimal harm

March 26, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview and review of the manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Two errors were observed in 28 opportunities resulting in a 7.14 % error rate. This affected two residents (Resident #15 and #36) of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 94.

November 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), facility, facility investigation, employee personnel file, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #95 was free from staff-to-resident abuse. This affected one resident (#95) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 93.

March 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 5 citations

E

Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure emergency call devices/call lights were within reach of Resident #12, #16, #20, #23 and #64. This affected five residents (#12, #16, #20, #23, #64, ) out of seven residents reviewed for emergency call devices within reach. The facility census was 94.
E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was implemented during medication administration for Resident's #18, #42, #43, #46 and #84 and during care for Resident #101. The facility also failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn during PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube care for Resident #46. This affected six residents (Resident's #18, #42, #43, #46, #84 and #101) and had the potential to affect an additional 37 residents (Resident's #3, #4, #6, #12, #17, #19, #21, #28, #33, #34, #36, #38, #40, #41, #46, #47, #49, #50, #54, #56, #58, #60, #63, #64, #66, #67, #70, #75, #79, #82, #83, #86, #88, #89, #91, #92, #94) residing on the 300 and 400 nursing units. The facility census was 94.
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #94 was provided incontinence care according to physician order and to maintain good hygiene for skin integrity. This affected one resident (Resident #94) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 94.
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place as ordered to prevent accidents for three residents (#23, #25, and #72) out of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 94.
D

Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.

F800 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure Resident #25, #26 and #74 received sugar-free pancake syrup in accordance with their low concentrated sweets (LCS) therapeutic diet order to meet their needs. This affected three residents (#25, #26 and #74) out of three residents reviewed for food/nutrition. The facility identified 14 residents (#7, #12, #25, #26, #32, #34, #37, #45, #54, #58, #63, #69, #74 and #88) as receiving a LCS diet. The facility census was 94.

January 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations

D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide timely and necessary treatment for Resident #22 following laboratory testing that included a critically high sodium level to prevent a hospitalization. This affected one resident (#22) of three residents reviewed for laboratory testing. The facility census was 88.
D

Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.

F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and facility policy, the facility failed to properly assess Resident #89's pain upon admission to ensure an effective pain management plan was in place. This affected one resident (#89) out of three residents reviewed for pain management. Facility census was 88.
D

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident #89 was administered medication per physician orders. This affected one resident (89) out of three residents for medication administration.

December 21, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation

D

Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the medical record, interviews with staff, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Residents #81 and #33 received their supplements as ordered and failed to ensure Resident #14 received nectar thick liquids as ordered. This affected three residents (#14, #33, and #81) out of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 97.

September 18, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 5, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy and interview the facility failed to timely address a concern/grievance and assist with a solution for Resident #202's responsible party related to the use of a video camera in the resident's room. This affected one resident (#202) of three residents reviewed for the use of video cameras. The facility census was 94.

May 4, 2021Standard inspection · 3 citations

E

Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2021

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to serve food at a safe/palatable temperatures on the Covid unit. This had the potential to affect all 16 residents (Residents #36, #41, #49, #50, #51, #53, #63, #70, #71, #76, #82, #210, #217, #225, #236, and #238) who ate meals on the Covid unit. The facility census was 77.
D

Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2021

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for Residents #55, #63 and #74. This affected three residents of 32 residents reviewed for call light placement.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2021

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's meal intakes were documented consistently for each meal. This affected three residents (Resident #4, Resident #19, and Resident #61) out of four residents reviewed for meal intakes. The facility census was 77 Findings Include: 1. Resident #19 was admitted to this facility on 01/28/21. Her admitting diagnoses included dementia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation and open wound on the right ankle. Review of Resident #19's plan of care dated 01/29/21 revealed she had impaired skin integrity of her right ankle. Interventions for this plan of care were for staff to administer treatments as ordered, assess and document the status of the wound, elevate her heels off of the bed, monitor her nutritional status and consult the dietician as needed. [...]

February 7, 2019Standard inspection · 1 citation

D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide consistent mouth care to Resident #24 who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. This affected one of four residents (#7, #15, #24, #31) reviewed for activities of daily living and one of six residents (#12, #15, #22, #24, #51 and #62) who [NAME] tube feedings.

Fire safety inspections

21 fire safety citations on file: 5 on December 21, 2023, 7 on May 4, 2021, 9 on February 7, 2019.

Every fire safety citation21 citations

F
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

K 521 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.

K 711 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.

K 351 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · May 4, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.

K 325 · May 4, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · May 4, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install properly constructed windows in hallway walls or doors.

K 364 · May 4, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · May 4, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.

K 920 · May 4, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · May 4, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.

K 761 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.

K 914 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.

K 374 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.

K 781 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.

K 920 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

K 923 · February 7, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Ohio	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.62	3.69	3.86
Registered nurses	0.61	0.64	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.27	3.28	3.42
Nurse aides	1.99
Licensed practical nurses	1.01
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	54.2%	48.7%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	30.8%	43.9%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 4.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 3.27 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.55 in April to June 2025 to 3.62 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.62	0.61	3.75	3.27	1.3%	0 of 90	90
Oct to Dec 2025	3.55	0.58	3.65	3.29	0.3%	0 of 92	89
Jul to Sep 2025	3.48	0.55	3.63	3.10	0.1%	0 of 92	90
Apr to Jun 2025	3.55	0.51	3.70	3.16	0.4%	0 of 91	90
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026	3.64	0.60	3.80	3.24	4.6%	0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Ohio

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Ohio, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$18.76	$17.93 to $21.44	63,280
LPNs and LVNs	$29.78	$27.34 to $31.68	39,900
Registered nurses	$39.67	$38.08 to $47.61	143,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Ohio	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.7	5.3	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.2	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.9	3.2	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.1	1.2	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.1	6.1	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.3	3.4	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.3	8.8	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	21.8	24.9	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	13.1	12.9	12.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BATH CREEK HEALTHCARE GROUP INC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Wiw Dynasty LLC	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	67%	01/01/2023
Wwbv Holdings LLC	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization	100%	09/30/2019
Nicoluzakis, Gregory	Managing control - governing body	Individual		09/01/2019
Volpe, Benjamin	Managing control - governing body	Individual		09/01/2019
Weisberg, William	Managing control - governing body	Individual		07/23/2019
Volpe, Benjamin	Corporate director	Individual		03/01/2019
Weisberg, William	Corporate director	Individual		03/01/2019
Nicoluzakis, Gregory	Corporate officer	Individual		09/01/2019
Volpe, Benjamin	Corporate officer	Individual		03/01/2019
Weisberg, William	Corporate officer	Individual		03/01/2019
Saber Governance LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		09/01/2019
Saber Healthcare Group LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		01/20/2023
Shg Management LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		09/01/2019
Burke, Karma	Operational/managerial control	Individual		03/21/2016
Weisberg, William	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual		06/23/2025
Bath Creek Real Estate Group, LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		02/01/2020
Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		04/01/2025
Saber Governance LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		09/01/2019
Saber Healthcare Group LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/20/2023
Shg Management LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		09/01/2019
Burke, Karma	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/21/2016
Nicoluzakis, Gregory	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/01/2019
Sakamuri, Laxmi Prasana	Adp of the SNF	Individual		11/01/2023
Volpe, Benjamin	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/01/2019
Weisberg, William	Adp of the SNF	Individual		01/20/2013

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 18, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 18, 2025: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2026: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 18, 2025: "Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.27 hours per resident per day, below the Ohio average of 3.28.

Other nursing homes nearby

Continuing Healthcare of Cuyahoga Falls
Cuyahoga Falls, 0.8 mi · not rated · 91 citations
Altercare of Cuyahoga Falls Ctr for Rehab & Nursin
Cuyahoga Falls, 2.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 33 citations
Wayside Farm Inc
Peninsula, 2.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 19 citations
Falls Village Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation
Cuyahoga Falls, 2.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
The Pavilion at Stow for Nursing and Rehabilitatio
Stow, 3.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Seasons Nursing and Rehab
Stow, 3.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 25 citations
Hickory Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Akron, 3.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 23 citations
Divine Rehabilitation and Nursing at Canal Pointe
Akron, 4.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 50 citations

Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Bath Creek Estates's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Bath Creek Estates 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Bath Creek Estates get at its last inspection?: 1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on December 21, 2023. The Ohio average is 10.5.
Has Bath Creek Estates been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Bath Creek Estates accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Bath Creek Estates?: CMS lists 25 owners and managers, and links the home to Saber Healthcare Group. Legal business name: BATH CREEK HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.