Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente
5020 Space Center Blvd, Pasadena, TX 77505 · Harris County · (713) 575-1800
124 certified beds, about 101 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2012
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676309 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 16 health citations since February 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.00 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.21 of those hours.
43.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
April 3, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be informed, in advance, of the care to be furnished for 1 (Resident #1) of 10 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure that a consent was signed by Resident #1 for Mirtazapine (an antidepressant medication). The failure could place residents at risk of not having an opportunity to refuse medications, ask questions regarding medications and/or be knowledgeable regarding side effects.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5) of 10 residents reviewed for resident records.1. The facility failed to ensure that antidepressant monitoring documentation was accurate and/or complete for Resident #1. 2. The facility failed to ensure that wound care documentation was accurate and/or completed for Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5.3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was seen by a physician during her admission at the facility from 1/13/2026 through 2/18/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of an inaccurate medical record and could place the residents at risk of harm and health decline and/or possible missed diagnosis.
November 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24- hour emergency dental care for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dental services in that: The facility failed to assist Resident #1 with obtaining dental services between 7/6/25 when dental pain was noted in Resident #1's electronic medical record and on 8/12/25 when Resident #1's family member made a grievance with the facility regarding Resident #1 wanting to see a dentist. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their oral health care needs met or dental pain.
May 21, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objective and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 (Resident #69 and Resident #302) of 7 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #69's care plan included information regarding assist rails. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #302's care plan included information regarding her use of CPAP and advance directives information. The failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and interventions to meet their needs.
- E Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, review the risks and benefits of bed rails prior to installation and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 2 (Resident #69 and Resident #5) of 8 residents reviewed for use of side rails. The facility failed to ensure Residents #69 and #5 had documentation and orders prior to installation of bed rails. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, not have adequate education regarding bed rails and/or staff not have adequate communication regarding residents' use of bed rails.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #302) of 7 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #302's advance directives was clearly identified and documented in the resident's electronic medical record and was not care planned until [DATE] when the resident was admitted [DATE]. The failure could place residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes honored and having incomplete records.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 medication fridges reviewed for storage of drugs. The facility failed to ensure that food items were not stored in the medication fridge per facility policy. This failure could place residents at risk of medications being cross contaminated with food items.
April 10, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for resident rights, in that: The facility failed to obtain a signed consent for antipsychotic medication, Quetiapine fumarate (Seroquel) that was administered to Resident #3. The failure could affect residents who received psychoactive medications without informed consents and placed them at risk of receiving treatments without informed consent.
- E Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 4 of 20 (Resident # 8, #26, #76 and & #97) residents review for accuracy of assessment. Resident # 8, #26, #76 and resident #97 were not accurately assessed for their oral dental needs on their MDS assessments. Resident # 76 was not accurately assessed for his vision on his annual MDS assessment. These failures could place the residents at risk for not receiving care and services to maintain their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to create a comprehensive resident-centered care plan with measurable objectives for person-centered care for 3 of 21 residents reviewed for care plan development (Residents # 17, 52, 158). --- Resident # 17 did not have a care plan for ADL assistance --- Resident # 52 did not have a care plan for ADL assistance --- Resident # 158 did not have a care plan for ADL assistance These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving accurate care and services according to their individual needs.
- E Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for resident rights, in that: The facility failed to obtain a signed consent for antipsychotic medication, Quetiapine fumarate (Seroquel) that was administered to Resident #3. The failure could affect residents who received psychoactive medications without informed consents and placed them at risk of receiving treatments without informed consent.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR ) Screening for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to review Resident #8's PASRR level 1 assessment for accuracy and refer Resident #8 for further assessment for services. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed assessments (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain from an outside source dental services to meet the needs of 1 of 21 residents reviewed for dental services. (Resident #76) The facility did not assist Resident #76, who had missing teeth and dental decay, with a dental service consult. This failure could place the residents at risk for not receiving care and services to maintain their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.
February 23, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, dispensing, receiving, and administering of medications for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #15), 1 of 1 medication storage rooms, and 1 of 3 medication carts, reviewed for pharmacy services in that: 1. The facility failed to order medications timely for Resident #15 which resulted in missed administration observed on 2/22/23. 2. The facility failed to ensure that expired medications were not stored with current medications in the medication storage room and the medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic benefit of the medication and/or worsening health concerns.
- D Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 4 days reviewed for RN hours, in that: Facility failed to make sure there was RN coverage for 4 days in the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (5%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6.9%, based on 2 errors out of 29 opportunities, which involved 1 of 6 residents (Resident #15), and 1 of 5 staff (Med Tech A) reviewed for medication errors. Med Tech A failed to administer 2 medications (Zinc Sulfate Tablet and Pro Stat Oral Liquid Amino Acids-Protein Hydrolysate) to Resident #15 on 02/22/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications and possible adverse reactions.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on May 21, 2025, 1 on April 10, 2024, 2 on February 23, 2023.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.00 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.21 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.74 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.91 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.88 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.3% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.60 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.11 on weekdays and 2.74 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.96 in April to June 2025 to 3.00 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.00 | 0.21 | 3.11 | 2.74 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 101 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.05 | 0.19 | 3.18 | 2.72 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 105 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.03 | 0.23 | 3.15 | 2.75 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 104 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.96 | 0.22 | 3.11 | 2.59 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 107 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.4 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.2 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper, Kimberly | Corporate director | Individual | 01/29/2024 | |
| Newton, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 02/22/2024 | |
| Baywood Crenshaw LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2021 | |
| Whatley, Darcy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Baywood Crenshaw LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/08/2025 | |
| Pillar Stone Real Estate Company LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/27/2025 | |
| Tarver, Mindy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Whatley, Darcy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/27/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 3, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 3, 2026: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 24, 2025: "Provide or obtain dental services for each resident."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.74 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Hca Houston Healthcare Southeast Pasadena, 1.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- The Suites Pasadena Pasadena, 1.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Avir at Pasadena Pasadena, 2.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Focused Care at Pasadena Pasadena, 2.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Pasadena Post Acute Pasadena, 2.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- The Courtyards at Pasadena Pasadena, 3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Sylan Shores Health and Wellness La Porte, 3.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Paradigm at Faith Memorial Pasadena, 4.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 22 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 21, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente?
- CMS lists 8 owners and managers. Legal business name: CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.