Pasadena Post Acute
4006 Vista Rd, Pasadena, TX 77504 · Harris County · (713) 943-1592
116 certified beds, about 98 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675365 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 15, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 14 health citations since February 2024, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $27,254 in the last three years; the largest was $13,627, and the latest is dated February 2, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.46 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
43.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
May 15, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to adequately allow residents to call for staff assistance from their bedside for four (Resident #1, Resident #5, Resident #9 and Resident #14) out of twenty-five residents for review of resident call systems. The facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible to Resident #1, Resident #5, Resident #9 and Resident #14 while in their beds on 05/12/2026 and 05/13/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of delays in care and emergency assistance.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident (Resident #14) environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible over three out of four days to prevent accidents. The facility failed to follow Resident #14's care plan interventions for falls. The failure could place residents at risk of injury, reduced mobility and hospitalization.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to prepare food in a form designed to meet individual needs for 5 residents (Resident # 59, 51,88, 23, and 4) reviewed for puree diet. -On 5/13/26 and 5/14/26 the protein puree (A puree diet consists of foods that are blended into a smooth, pudding-like consistency to make eating and swallowing easier for people with chewing or swallowing difficulties) portions of lunch were not the correct texture. This failure had the potential to cause residents on a puree diet to aspirate, choke, or cause weight-loss due to difficulty in consuming meals. Record review of the facility therapeutic diet roster dated 5/12/26 revealed that Resident #'s 59, 51, 88, 23 and 4 required a puree diet. Record review of the menu dated 5/13/26 revealed baked chicken would be served. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 out of 7 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for infection control. Staff failed to ensure Resident #36's indwelling urinary catheter drainage spout was not touching the floor in the main dining room during lunchtime meal service. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination, infection and decline in health.
April 3, 2025Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer a resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident assessment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's PASRR Level I screening reflected her mental illness diagnosis. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized services for their mental illness.
February 2, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- K Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when the resident experienced a change in condition for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for a change in condition. The facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #55 was pocketing Oxycodone pills on [DATE]. Resident #55 was found unresponsive and was sent to the local hospital on [DATE] for respiratory distress. The local hospital sent her to an inpatient behavioral hospital where she was admitted due to worsening of mood and suicidal attempt by drug overdose. An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 5:21 p.m. [...]
- K Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with the resident rights and that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and failed to describe services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as required for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to put behavioral interventions in place for Resident #55 when she returned from the behavioral hospital on [DATE] after being treated for drug overdose and suicidal idealation into the care plan. An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 9:45am. [...]
- K Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for supervision. -The facility failed to put interventions in place to prevent overdose of medications when Resident #55 was first noticed by the staff on [DATE] pocketing medications including narcotics. Resident #55 was found unresponsive and was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for respiratory distress with a hospital discharge diagnosis of drug overdose/suicidal attempt. An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 5:21 p.m. While the IJ was lowered on [DATE] at 2:33 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of more than minimal harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. [...]
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for six (Resident #44, #27, #82, #84, #309, #99) of six residents reviewed for receiving enteral feeding via a pump. -The facility failed to clean enteral feeding pumps and poles, which were dirty on 01/09/24, 01/10/24, and 01/11/24 for Residents #44, #27, #82, #84, #309, and #99. This failure could affect the residents who received their nutritional needs via an enteral feeding pump, by placing them at risk for spreading disease-causing organisms, cross-contamination, and possible infection.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, including the expiration date for 2 out of 5 residents (Residents #73 and #53) and 1 out of 3 Med Carts (100 Hall Nursing Cart) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure the 100 Hall Nursing Cart did not contain: -20 tabs of Hydroxyzine 10mg (for anxiety or itching from allergic response), that expired on 9/1/23 for Resident #73. -½ a bottle of NPH insulin 100u/ml (used to bring blood sugar down), that expired on 1/8/24 for Resident #53. -½ of a multi-use bottle of Ibuprofen 200mg tabs, that expired on 10/31/23. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic benefits of the medication, adverse reactions to medications, and hospitalization.
- E Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist's medication regimen review recommendations were reviewed by the resident's attending physician, were documented in the medical record, and what, if any, action had been taken to address them, for 6 of 12 months (February, March, April, May, June, and August 2023) reviewed for pharmacy services. -The facility failed to provide Drug Regimen Review forms that were noted by the MD, for the months of February, March, April, May, June, and August of 2023. The DRR forms were either blank or missing all together. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse reactions to medications, continued used of inappropriate medications, or harm including hospitalization if the MD did not review the DRR forms. Findings Include: [...]
- E Keep all essential equipment working safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 2 (Dryer #1 and Dryer #3) of 3 dryers reviewed for equipment in safe operating condition. -The facility failed to check and clean the lint filters at appropriate times. The facility failed to clean the lint filter in Dryer #1 from 7 a.m. to 1 p.m., which caused a buildup of lint. The facility failed to clean the excess lint in Dryer #3, which caused a build up of lint under the machine. These failures could cause a fire or injury.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 3 out of 7 residents (Residents #305, #28, and #89), reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to: -Update Resident #305's care plan to indicate she communicated with pen/paper due to not being able to speak. -Update Resident #28's care plan to indicate she no longer had a PICC line. -Update Resident #89's care plan to indicate she no longer was on a pureed diet. These failures could place residents at risk for receiving delayed treatment and not obtaining/maintaining their highest practicable wellbeing.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for two out of two Resident reviewed for food service, in that; -The facility failed to follow proper hand hygiene, sanitation, and food handling practices. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses.
Fire safety inspections
9 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 15, 2026, 3 on April 3, 2025, 4 on February 2, 2024.
Every fire safety citation9 citations
- F Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 2, 2024 | Fine | $13,627 |
| February 2, 2024 | Fine | $13,627 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.46 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.18 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.10 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.99 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.3% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.12 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.57 on weekdays and 3.18 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 11.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.57 in April to June 2025 to 3.46 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.46 | 0.37 | 3.57 | 3.18 | 11.7% | 0 of 90 | 98 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.43 | 0.36 | 3.57 | 3.07 | 13.2% | 0 of 92 | 96 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.46 | 0.40 | 3.61 | 3.07 | 14.9% | 0 of 92 | 102 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.57 | 0.42 | 3.71 | 3.24 | 15.5% | 0 of 91 | 104 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.8 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: LIBERTY COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 1.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty County Hospital District No 1 | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/01/2022 |
| Blumquist, Cory | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Stratton, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Pasadena Care Center, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2022 | |
| Murray, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 15, 2026: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 3, 2025: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 15, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 15, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Focused Care at Pasadena Pasadena, 0.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Avir at Pasadena Pasadena, 0.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Hca Houston Healthcare Southeast Pasadena, 2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- The Suites Pasadena Pasadena, 2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Paradigm at Faith Memorial Pasadena, 2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- The Courtyards at Pasadena Pasadena, 2.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente Pasadena, 2.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Park Manor of South Belt Houston, 5.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 9 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Pasadena Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Pasadena Post Acute 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Pasadena Post Acute get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 15, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Pasadena Post Acute been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $27,254 in the last three years.
- Does Pasadena Post Acute accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Pasadena Post Acute?
- CMS lists 5 owners and managers. Legal business name: LIBERTY COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 1.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.