Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Corpus Christi

Brookdale Trinity Towers

317 N Carancahua, Corpus Christi, TX 78401 · Nueces County · (361) 887-2000

75 certified beds, about 48 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998

CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675773 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 30, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 24 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,449 in the last three years; the largest was $16,449, and the latest is dated December 2, 2023.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.42 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.12 of those hours.

46.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Brookdale Senior Living, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
6E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 6, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had an EBP sign posted outside of his room due to having a Foley Catheter. The facility failed to ensure CNA-B wore the appropriate PPE when providing care to Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and infection.
June 4, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    F627 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on Record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #2) of five residents discharged did not receive the required 30-day notice of discharge. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was given a 30-day discharge notice. Resident #2 was discharge on [DATE]. The failure could put residents at risk for inappropriate discharge from the facility and cause psychological harm due to feelings of anger and sadness. This failure could place discharged residents at risk of being discharged from the facility causing a disruption in their care and/or services
  2. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to send a copy of the discharge notice, prior to the discharge, to the representative of the Office of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to send a copy of Resident #1 and Resident #2's discharge notice, prior to discharge, to the representative of the Office of State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. These failures could have placed the residents at risk of not knowing their rights or receiving the services of the state Long Term-Care Ombudsman. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1 face sheet dated 06/04/26 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); [...]
May 21, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to document the amount of food Resident #1 ate during her 3 meals per day for 10 times from March 1st through March 15th, 2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving proper care or having needs met due to inappropriate documentation.
April 30, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within 14 calendar days after admission as required for 1 (Resident#70) of 7 resident records reviewed for assessment. The facility failed to complete Resident #70's comprehensive MDS assessment within 14 days following her admission to the facility on [DATE]. This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk of not receiving the proper care required to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident needs, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #60) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #60's care plan reflected her ADLs with assistance needed. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their needs.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan by the interdisciplinary team, for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for comprehensive care plan revisions. The facility failed to review and revise Resident #7's care plan to reflect she no longer used a catheter. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their current needs.
  4. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices, and maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or the resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 (Resident #70) of 7 residents reviewed for nutritional status. The facility failed to ensure Resident #70 was weighed weekly for 3 weeks after admission per physician's orders. This failure could place residents at risk for nutritional deficit, weight loss, skin breakdown, and overall decline in quality of life.
  5. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident in 2 of 2 medication rooms (4th floor and 5th floor) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed the ensure expired medication was removed from the 4th floor medication storage room. The facility failed the ensure expired medication was removed from the 5th floor medication storage room. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications and or adverse reactions to medications.
  6. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 freezer and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (4th floor medication room) reviewed for food safety.-The facility failed to ensure food items (raw dinner rolls, breaded chicken tenders, and breaded fish) in the freezer were sealed properly.-The facility failed to ensure resident food items were disposed of according to policy. -The facility failed to ensure the resident food and drink refrigerator in a medication storage room was clean and did not have any food or drink remnants in it. These failures could place residents at risk of complications from food contamination.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure infusion therapy supplies were stored under sterile conditions in the 4th floor medication storage room. The facility failed to ensure used oxygen equipment was not stored in the 4th floor medication storage room. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination and infection.
September 10, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented within a timely manner for each resident consistent with resident rights to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #1) out of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to add the fall with significant injury, fall mats, and the surgical wound with wound care to Resident #1's care plan. The facility also failed to complete Resident #1's comprehensive care plan within the specified time frame. These failures could place residents at risk for receiving inadequate care and services.
February 20, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen (K2) reviewed and 2 of 2 satellite kitchens (SK4 and SK2) for storage, preparation, and sanitation. 1. Satellite Kitchen 4 (SK4) The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of the steam table holding wells and shelf, that a cleaning schedule was followed, personal items were not kept in the dry storage room, and all staff wore a hair and beard net while in SK4. 2. Satellite Kitchen 2 (SK2) The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of the steam table holding wells and shelf, that a cleaning schedule was followed, and personal items were not kept in the server room, in SK2. 3. [...]
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 3 of 12 residents (Residents #15, #33, and #152) observed for infection control practices. The facility failed to post Enhanced Barrier Precaution signs outside the rooms of Resident #'s 15, 33 and 152. These failures could place residents, staff, and visitors at risk of cross contamination and/or infection.
  3. E
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all kitchen equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen (K2) reviewed and 1 of 2 satellite kitchens (SK2) reviewed for safe operating equipment. The facility failed to maintain a chest type freezer with heavy ice build-up on the inside walls, bottom, and lid in SK2. The facility failed to maintain and remove a 4-foot X 3-foot char broiler that did not work, had no griddle on it, and was connected to the gas line in K2. The facility failed to maintain and remove dented holding pans and dented prep equipment (food mill) in K2. The facility failed to maintain the walk-in freezer by not allowing ice accumulation around the fan and low lighting in K2. These failures could cause food-borne illness from equipment not being maintained and/or cleaned effectively.
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #15 and Resident #30) of 16 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #15's care plan to include oxygen therapy. The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #30's care plan to include oxygen therapy. [...]
December 2, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. J
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for one of one resident (Resident #198) reviewed for tracheostomy care . 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #198 had suction equipment, emergency supplies, a spare trach or a care plan specific for tracheostomy care. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff could describe steps to take in the event of an emergency dislodgement of Resident #198's trach. 3. The facility failed to ensure staff were competent in trach care and knowledgeable of equipment needed. These failures could place residents at risk for suffocation and death. [...]
  2. E
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for two residents (R #159 and R #200) reviewed for restorative care. The facility failed to apply knee immobilizer to Resident #159's knee to reduce the risk of further loss of range of motion. The facility failed to back immobilizer to Resident #200's back to reduce the risk of further loss of range of motion. This failure placed residents on restorative nursing care at risk for decline in range of motion, and decreased mobility.
  3. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for of two of five medication carts (200 and 300 Hall 2nd floor Medication Cart) reviewed for medication storage The facility failed to ensure, 200 and 300 hall medication carts were locked when unattended. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed mediations.
  4. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food plates. 1. Upon two separate visits to the 4th floor satellite kitchen revealed a worn, distressed looking temperature log binder being placed to lean against the food plates that are served to the residents for their meals every day. This failure could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and food-borne illnesses. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff did not store their personal drinks in the preparation area of the facility kitchen.
  5. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for one of 30 residents (Resident #200) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to complete an accurate updated comprehensive assessment for Resident #200. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their care and treatment needs assessed to ensure necessary care and services were provided.
  6. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 29, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives, and timeframes to meet a residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of two residents (Resident #198 and Resident #200) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #198's tracheotomy care needs or address emergency management in the event of a dislodgement. 2. The facility failed to correctly assess/identify/document Resident #200's current physical functioning and the use of a back brace in his initial assessment dated [DATE]. These failures could place resident's at risks of suffocation or death.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for Resident #160 of 55 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. LVN C did not perform hand hygiene for 20 seconds or greater while performing wound care on Resident #160. These failures could place residents at risk for infection through cross contamination of pathogens.
September 23, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one resident (Resident -R# 1) of five residents that were reviewed for infection control and transmission-based precautions policies and practices, in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN A performed hand hygiene and removed her contaminated gloves prior to the commencement of perineal care after she touched multiple surfaces. This failure could place residents at risk for infection through cross contamination of pathogens.

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 30, 2026.

Every fire safety citation2 citations
  1. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · April 30, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
    K 914 · April 30, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
December 2, 2023Fine $16,449

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.423.393.86
Registered nurses1.120.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.012.983.42
Nurse aides1.84
Licensed practical nurses1.47
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)46.8%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover27.3%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.62 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.59 on weekdays and 4.01 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.64 in April to June 2025 to 4.42 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.421.124.594.01 0.0%0 of 9048
Oct to Dec 20254.420.834.544.12 0.0%0 of 9248
Jul to Sep 20254.350.834.484.01 0.0%0 of 9251
Apr to Jun 20254.640.974.754.35 0.0%0 of 9149
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.515.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.40.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.93.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.31.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.714.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.13.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.69.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.025.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.112.312.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: TRINITY TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. CMS links this home to Brookdale Senior Living, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
American Retirement CorporationIndirect ownership interestOrganization02/12/1997
Brookdale Senior Living IncIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/28/2005
Kussow, DawnIndirect ownership interestIndividual04/30/2025
White, ChadwickIndirect ownership interestIndividual04/30/2025
Capital One Na5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization10/13/2022
Capital One Na5% or greater security interestOrganization10/13/2022
Bowman, KevinManaging control - governing bodyIndividual10/01/2021
White, ChadwickManaging control - governing bodyIndividual03/09/2018
Deen, LoriOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/22/2025
Galbreath, SheilaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/22/2025
Hollowell, KathyOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/22/2025
Kussow, DawnOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/23/2024
La Marre, KevinOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/22/2017
Munoz, AnnaOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/15/2024
Pennington, BrentOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/22/2025
Ruiz-Cerros, MarissaOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/02/2020
Stengle, NikolasOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/08/2025
Terrell, DamiraOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/22/2025
White, ChadwickOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/09/2018
Arc Corpus Christi, LLCGeneral partnership interestOrganization01/02/1990
Arc LP Holdings, LLCLimited partnership interestOrganization09/24/2002
Asher, JordanIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
Drayton, ClaudiaIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
Fioravanti, MarkIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
Freed, VictoriaIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
Hausman, JoshuaIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
La Marre, KevinIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
Mace, ElizabethIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
Warren, DeniseIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
Wielansky, LeeIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
American Retirement CorporationAdp of the SNFOrganization02/12/1997
Arc LP Holdings, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization09/24/2002
Bkd Shoreline LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/12/2015
Brookdale Senior Living IncAdp of the SNFOrganization11/22/2005
Lbmc PCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2024
Trinity Towers Limited PartnershipAdp of the SNFOrganization02/12/2015
Walters Financial Services IncAdp of the SNFOrganization07/22/2025
Hollowell, KathyAdp of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
Pennington, BrentAdp of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025
Ruiz-Cerros, MarissaAdp of the SNFIndividual10/07/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 6, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 30, 2026: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 30, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Brookdale Trinity Towers's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Brookdale Trinity Towers 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Brookdale Trinity Towers get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 30, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Brookdale Trinity Towers been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,449 in the last three years.
Does Brookdale Trinity Towers accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Brookdale Trinity Towers?
CMS lists 40 owners and managers, and links the home to Brookdale Senior Living. Legal business name: TRINITY TOWERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection