202 Fortune Dr., Corpus Christi, TX 78405 · Nueces County · (361) 252-0734
121 certified beds, about 91 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455697 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 4, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since April 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,069 in the last three years; the largest was $14,069, and the latest is dated March 26, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.01 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.23 of those hours.
36.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Avir Health Group, an affiliated group of 118 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse served as the full time Director of Nursing for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nursing services. The facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the full time DON since 04/25/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care, as well as cause a lack of nursing oversight and higher level of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately to the appropriate State Agency, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #2) reviewed for freedom from abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #2's allegation of verbal abuse by a staff member on 05/17/2026. The state agency was notified on 05/19/2026. This failure could result in placing residents at increased risk for further abuse, as well as not receiving a proper or thorough investigation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored appropriately for 1 of 4 medication carts (300 Hall Medication Cart) and 1 of 1 Emergency Crash Cart reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the 300 Hall Nurse Med-Cart was locked and secured.2. The facility failed to ensure the Emergency Crash Cart was locked and secured. These failures could place residents at risk of taking or ingesting medications and/or medical supplies which could have caused them harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for infection control practices.1. The facility failed to ensure the IP, the WCN, and LVN-B knew the proper placement of the PPE cart for Resident #1.2. The facility failed to ensure the physician's order for EBP was obtained prior to placing Resident #1 on precautions. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination and/or infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #42 and #89) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to clarify the blood pressure parameters for Resident #42's Midodrine (a medication used to treat hypotension, or low blood pressure) orders started [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to administer Resident #42's and Resident #89's Midodrine per the recommended and prescribed order and blood pressure parameters in August of 2025. These failures could place residents at risk for complications and jeopardize their health and safety. 1. Record review of Resident #42's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of [DATE]. Pertinent diagnoses included hypotension (low blood pressure). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed and 1 of 1 nutrition room for storage, preparation, and sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure there were no personal items in the walk-in refrigerator or on the tray line. 2. The facility failed to ensure all items in the walk-in refrigerator were labeled and dated. 3. The facility failed to ensure there was an internal thermometer in the walk-in refrigerator. 4. The facility failed to ensure there was no ice accumulation in the walk-in freezer. 5. The facility failed to ensure that boxes of food in the walk-in freezer were sealed tightly and at least 18 inches from the ceiling. 6. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #48) reviewed for reporting. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan which included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was implemented within 48 hours of admission for 1 (Resident #100) of 5 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility did not develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for Resident #100. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving person-centered care and/or services to meet their physical and/or psychosocial needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had a physician's order to assess the dialysis shunt or fistula (a dialysis access which allows the removal of waste and extra fluid). The facility failed to monitor Resident #6's dialysis catheter by assessing for the thrill and bruit each shift. These failures could place residents at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 resident (Resident #89) of 6 residents reviewed for infection control practices.1) The facility failed to ensure the WCN performed hand hygiene after removing gloves prior to performing wound care on Resident #89 and after sanitizing scissors. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice, that were complete and accurately documented, for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for personal inventory log. When Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], LVN A failed to complete an accurate inventory log for Resident #1's belongings. This failure could jeopardize a resident from having their valuables properly recorded, which in turn could result in a resident's valuables being misplaced and/or not returning home with the correct resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision while Resident #1 was unaccounted for approximately 10 minutes from 9:05 PM to 9:15 PM on 12/13/24 before LVN C found Resident #1 alone in the 100-hall shower room on the floor. Resident #1 sustained an injury to his head from the fall and was taken to a local hospital where he was diagnosed with an acute on chronic intracranial subdural hematoma (occurs when a new, acute bleed happens to a pre-existing chronic subdural hematoma, often triggered by even minor trauma. A subdural hematoma is a collection of blood that accumulates between the brain and the innermost layer of the skull). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, documenting, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #4, #2, and #3) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure LVN-A signed her MAR when she administered PRN narcotics to Residents #4, #2 and #3. The facility failed to ensure LVN-A wasted her PRN narcotic medications with another licensed nurse. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving, or receiving more than intended amount of, PRN narcotic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1. The facility failed to ensure that food items in the walk- in cooler were labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure that food items in the walk- in cooler were discarded after the use by date. 3. The facility failed to ensure that food containers in the walk- in cooler were tightly sealed. 4. The facility failed to ensure that items labeled keep frozen were kept in the freezer. 5. The facility failed to ensure that food items in the dry storage area were labeled and dated. 6. The facility failed to ensure that food items were refrigerated after opening per the manufacturer's label. 7. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preference for four (Residents #254, #26, #66, #86) of fourteen residents reviewed for call light. The facility failed to ensure Residents #254, #26, #66, #86's call lights were within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to fix a broken face plate covering an outlet, restore damaged walls, investigate a dark substance on the ceiling, and fix a sharps container that was attached to the wall at a single point allowing it to rotate freely. These failures place residents at risk of experiencing a diminished quality of life potentially leading to psychosocial harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 5 of 6 (Resident #12, Resident #7, Resident#254, Resident#396, and Resident #36) residents reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 had the required emergency supplies at bedside including a suction machine, supply of suction catheters, sterile gloves and flush solution on 07/30/2024 at 10:08 AM. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's oxygen tubing was connected to the concentrator and the oxygen was administered at the correct setting of 2 liters per minute on Resident #7's oxygen concentrator was set at 3 liters per minute 7/29/24 at 9:05 AM. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 3 halls (Hall 200) reviewed for environment. 1) The facility failed to keep the soiled linen utility closet containing dirty linens locked when not in use. 2) The facility failed to keep the oxygen storage room containing empty and full oxygen canisters locked when not in use. 3) the facility failed to keep the central supply storage room containing approximately 40 individual shaving razors locked when not in use. These failures could result in injury for residents who come into contact with sharp implements or hazardous materials.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests in one of one kitchen reviewed for pests. 1. There were multiple live flies and gnats in the kitchen. 2. There were multiple live flies in the dining room. These failures could put residents who consumed food from the kitchen and who ate in the dining room at risk for infection and/or food contamination.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge and the reasons for the transfer or discharge in writing to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for two (Resident #82 and Resident 93) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility failed to send a transfer or discharge notice in writing to the facility's Ombudsman as soon as practicable when Resident #82 was discharged home on 7/25/24. The facility failed to send a transfer or discharge notice in writing to the facility's Ombudsman as soon as practicable when Resident #93 was discharged to another facility on 5/11/24. This failure could affect residents at the facility by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and the appeal processes.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for one glucometer (Hall 100 Glucometer check log) of three glucometers reviewed for proper calibration. The facility failed to ensure the 100 hall glucometer was calibrated daily for accuracy of reading on 10 separate days in July 2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving accurate blood glucose measurements to assure reliable results and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #36 ) reviewed for medication administration. Resident #36's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) reflected the administration of oxygen was not accurately documented, the order was not reconciliated or recorded and administration of oxygen was completed and not accurately documented. The deficient practice placed resident #36 and 2 additional residents who receive medications from facility staff at risk for less than therapeutic benefits, and/or not receiving ordered medications/treatments due to inaccurate documentation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one Resident (Resident #44) of four residents observed for infection control practices during personal care, in that: 1.) The facility failed to ensure LVN D performed hand hygiene for 20 seconds or greater after wound care for Resident #44. This failure could place residents that require assistance with personal care at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 (RM# 304, RM#112 and RM#216) rooms observed for maintenance. The facility failed to maintain resident occupied RM#304, RM# 112 and RM#216: -RM# 304 had unaligned and broken floor tiles. -RM#112 had part of the ceiling texture was falling. -RM#216 had an unsecured door. These failures could place residents in rooms at risk for injury or a declined sense of worth.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for indwelling catheters. The facility failed to prevent Resident #2's urinary catheter tubing from touching the floor. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and, interview the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards as posible for 2 of 2 unlocked resident rooms reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure the two resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were free of cluttered storage of equipment, Hoyer lifts, furniture, boxes, walkers, wheelchairs in a secured manner. This failure could place residents at risk of being in an unsafe environment and at risk for accidents and injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials which included to the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for one (Resident #1) of 18 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility staff did not report Resident #1's allegation of abuse to the state agency when Resident #1 voiced his concern of being threatened with a gun. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse or neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. There was expired chocolate milk in the refrigerator There were dirty dishes on the clean rack There were dented and scratched pans This failure could place residents at serious risk for complications from food contamination.
4 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 31, 2024, 2 on April 20, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 26, 2025 | Fine | $14,069 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.01 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.23 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.67 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.89 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.89 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.5% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.53 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.15 on weekdays and 2.67 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.99 in April to June 2025 to 3.01 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.01 | 0.23 | 3.15 | 2.67 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 91 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.91 | 0.20 | 3.03 | 2.60 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 89 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.92 | 0.25 | 3.05 | 2.60 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 90 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.99 | 0.23 | 3.12 | 2.67 | 0.0% | 3 of 91 | 90 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.1 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Avir at Corpus Christi's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (58.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.
7.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
85.3% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: STRATFORD HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Avir Health Group, a group of 118 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stratford Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2024 |
| Chumley, Richard | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| 202 Fortune Dr Opco, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| Freund, Nochum | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Moore, Gregory | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Travitsky, Aaron | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Dagan, Amitai | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/21/2025 | |
| Goldberger, Abraham | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/21/2025 | |
| Goldberger, Faigy | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/21/2025 | |
| 202 Fortune Dr Property Owner, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| Welltower Nnn Group, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| Welltower Op, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| De La Garza, Ernest | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/31/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.