Home / California / Pacific Grove
Canterbury Woods
651 Sinex Avenue, Pacific Grove, CA 93950 · Monterey County · (831) 373-3111
24 certified beds, about 16 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 1972
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055303 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 27, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 26 health citations since July 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 6.71 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.46 of those hours.
19.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
CMS links it to Front Porch, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
February 27, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and/or prepared under sanitary conditions when:A Kitchen Staff was not wearing hair restraint in the kitchen, andUnlabeled packs of bread were found in the food pantry. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses.
- D Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three out of four sampled residents (Residents 9, 23, and 39), who signed the binding arbitration agreement (BAA, contract between the facility and resident requiring disputes to be resolved by a neutral arbitrator [third party decision-maker] instead of a judge or jury in court) understood the BAA prior to signing. This failure posed the risk for the residents to make uninformed decisions regarding the right to file an appeal, if there were any allegations of medical malpractice. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/25/26 at 2:21 p.m. in the activity room with Resident 9, Resident 9 verified her signature on a BAA signed on 1/22/26. Resident 9 stated she did not know about the BAA and was not aware she signed the agreement. Resident 9 stated she just had a surgery prior to signing the BAA. [...]
February 12, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteFindings:Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 received oxygen therapy with no physician's order and there was no oxygen care plan. These failures had the potential to compromise the resident's health and well-being. Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation (COPD, a progressive, irreversible disease that restricts airflow causing breathing problem); acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a critical condition where the lungs cannot adequately transfer oxygen to the blood.)Review of Resident 1's Weights and Vital Summary - Vital: [...]
September 13, 2024Standard inspection · 11 citations
- E Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, one of eight sampled residents (Resident 66), was free of significant medication error, when the physician order for the Lasix (a diuretic, used to reduce fluid retention) medication, of Resident 66 was not followed. This failure had the potential to affect the health and general well-being of the resident.
- E Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in safe and sanitary manner when: 1. Resident foods and food brought by family or visitor stored in the refrigerator at the facility dining area, were readily accessible to all the residents and; 2. Expired food was kept in the cabinet at the facility dining area. These failures had the potential to access the expired food and the food brought by family or visitor in the refrigerator.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (person who routinely visits the facility and advocates for the residents) for one of two sample discharged residents (Resident 14) when Resident 14 was transferred to the acute care hospital. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not having an advocate who could inform them of their admission, transfer, and discharge rights and options.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 12) when the resident's communication care plan was not person-centered. This failure had the potential for inaccurate development and implementation of person-centered care plans that would address the residents' identified concerns and needs.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an activity program that met the resident's needs, interests, and preferences was provided to one of eight sampled residents (Resident 11). This failure had the potential to affect the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and quality of life.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT, a group of health care professionals from diverse fields who work toward a common goal for residents) assessed and discussed the cause of unplanned weight loss, updated the care plan with a measurable goal and interventions, and provided necessary and timely interventions to maintain the acceptable weights of the residents when there was no follow-up by the IDT after the significant weight loss for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential to result in being unable to evaluate the residents' complete nutritional status and provide necessary interventions timely.
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their bed rails (adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed: side rails, safety rails, and grab/assist bars) policy for one of one sampled resident (Resident 2) when there was no informed consent verification form obtained prior to installing bed rails. This failure had the potential to result in the resident and the resident's responsible parties (RP, individuals designated to make decisions on behalf of the residents) not being fully informed of the use of bed rails.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to document administration of controlled medications (medications controlled by the government because they may be abused or cause addiction) on the controlled medication accountability sheet (count sheet) for one resident (Resident 8). This failure compromised the facility's ability to ensure accurate administration of medications.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that recipe for making puree was being followed when the executive chef did not follow the recipe for making chicken teriyaki puree. This failure had the potential to result in decreased palatability that could lead to decrease in food intake for the 2 residents with puree diet order out of the skilled nursing facility census of 15.
- D Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one out of five sampled residents (Resident 6), who signed the binding arbitration agreement (BAA, contract between the facility and resident requiring disputes to be resolved by a neutral arbitrator [third party decision-maker] instead of a judge or jury in court) understood the BAA prior to signing. This failure posed the risk for the resident to make uninformed decisions regarding the right to file an appeal if there was any allegations of medical malpractice.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 165) when staff did not follow the facility's handwashing/hand hygiene policy. This failure had the potential to spread infection in the facility.
July 21, 2023Standard inspection · 12 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the director of dining services (DDS) comprehensively carried out the functions of the food and nutrition services when the DDS did not perform kitchen audits monthly as scheduled. This failure resulted lapses in the delivery of services associated with food safety and sanitation (cross-reference F812) which had the potential transmission of foodborne illness to 16 residents.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. The condiments were opened but not labeled or dated, stored beyond used date, label about storage after opening was not followed and one condiment did not have the right cap to cover the bottle tightly; 2. The walk-in freezer's ceiling had ice buildup; 3. Dietary staff did not follow the proper use of hair restraints; 4. A water dispenser was not kept in a sanitary condition; 5. Dishwasher D (DW D) used the expired quat test strips (used to determine that the concentrations of quaternary ammonium [quat-a chemical that kills bacteria, molds, and virus] in sanitizer solutions are at the correct level); 6. There was water pooling in the kitchen floor behind the steamer; 7. [...]
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the wheels on the bed of residents were locked for two of five sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 220). This failure had the potential to result in accident and injury.
- E Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and facility's document review, the facility failed to provide a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure had the potential to affect resident's care, health, and well-being.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling for one of one medication cart. This failure had the potential to result in the administration of outdated or expired medication.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wrote3. During an observation, on 7/17/23, at 8:02 A.M., the EST was seen wearing disposable gloves on both hands while cleaning a resident's room. After cleaning, she removed one glove only. She proceeded to hold a plastic bag with soiled rags with the ungloved hand and pushed the cart using the gloved hand towards the end of the hallway. She then went to the dirty utility area carrying the plastic bag. She then came out and opened a closet located in the hallway still with one gloved hand and removed several rolls of toilet paper. After that she then removed the glove. No hand hygiene or hand washing performed. During an interview, on 7/17/23, at 9:26 A.M., EST stated that when cleaning resident rooms, she would perform hand hygiene, wear gloves, use only one rag to mop the floor. She also stated that after cleaning the room, she would remove gloves, rags, garbage and do hand hygiene. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an organized and sanitary environment for one non-sampled resident (Resident 14) when the bathroom was disorganized, and the toilet bowl was dirty. These failures created a disorganized and unsanitary environment that could pose safety risks for Resident 14.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (person who routinely visits the facility and advocates for the residents in the nursing homes) when one of two residents (Resident 18 ) was transferred to the hospital. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not being informed of her rights.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) assessment for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 7) when Resident 7's completed and transmitted quarterly MDS did not reflect Resident 7's hospice care. These omissions in coding resulted in an inaccurate MDS and not addressing the resident needs.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program that meet the resident's needs, interests, and preferences for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 11) when Resident 11's activity care plan was not updated and implemented. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's physical, mental, psychosocial well-being, and self-worth.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4) in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility's policy and procedure when a Certified Nursing Assistant A (CNA A) administered oxygen (a colorless and odorless gas that people need to breath) to a resident. This failure had the potential for unsafe oxygen administration and negatively affect the resident's health and safety.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 7) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when Resident 7 received Lorazepam (a medication for anxiety) without documentation of its specific duration in the resident's clinical record. This failure had the potential for increased risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications that could negatively affect the residents physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Fire safety inspections
23 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 24, 2026, 5 on February 27, 2026, 2 on November 24, 2025, 3 on September 13, 2024, 12 on July 21, 2023.
Every fire safety citation23 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Follow proper procedures when the fire alarm was out of service for more than 4 hours.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- E Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- C Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 6.71 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.46 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 5.71 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.77 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.48 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 19.2% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.0% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.22 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 7.12 on weekdays and 5.71 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.61 in April to June 2025 to 6.71 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 6.71 | 1.46 | 7.12 | 5.71 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 16 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.56 | 0.98 | 4.77 | 4.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 23 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 6.02 | 1.12 | 6.33 | 5.24 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 18 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 6.61 | 1.12 | 6.98 | 5.72 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 16 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.7 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.0 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: FRONT PORCH COMMUNITIES AND SERVICES. CMS links this home to Front Porch, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 4.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Porch Communities and Services | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2022 |
| Duranteau, Nancy | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Forte, Vincent | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Handy, Joanne | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Jacobs, Laura | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Kroeker, Kevin | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| McGovern, Marion | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Spencer, Peter | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Tonnu, Diemlan | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Wesson, Oliver | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Whittaker, Susan | Corporate director | Individual | 01/23/2018 | |
| Kelly, Sean | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/06/2023 | |
| Salvador, Eduardo | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/03/2017 | |
| Vranich, Rachel | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/17/2022 | |
| Akopyan, Gevork | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/12/2022 | |
| Banner, Ryan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/17/2025 | |
| Behnam, Shaida | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/14/2024 | |
| Ichien, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/27/2026 | |
| Kelly, Sean | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/06/2023 | |
| Macango, Susan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/04/2026 | |
| McMullin, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Nabor-Andoy, Merza | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/24/2022 | |
| Olson, Kari | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Salvador, Eduardo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Front Porch Communities and Services | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Banner, Ryan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/09/2025 | |
| Behnam, Shaida | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/14/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on September 13, 2024: "Provide activities to meet all resident's needs."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on February 27, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 13, 2024: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Forest Hill Manor Health Center Pacific Grove, 0 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Oceanview Post Acute Pacific Grove, 0.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 47 citations
- Cypress Ridge Care Center Monterey, 1.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- Monterey Post Acute Monterey, 1.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 55 citations
- Westland House Monterey, 2.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Carmel Hills Care Center Monterey, 4.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- Katherine Healthcare Salinas, 15.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 50 citations
- Coastal Post Acute Salinas, 15.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 39 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Canterbury Woods's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Canterbury Woods 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Canterbury Woods get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 27, 2026. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Canterbury Woods been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Canterbury Woods accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns Canterbury Woods?
- CMS lists 27 owners and managers, and links the home to Front Porch. Legal business name: FRONT PORCH COMMUNITIES AND SERVICES.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.