Chapman Valley Manor
1009 N Marshall, Chapman, KS 67431 · Dickinson County · (785) 922-6525
30 certified beds, about 24 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175474 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 18, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 21 health citations since September 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.74 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
61.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
509/21
603/23
201/24
809/24
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
18D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
September 18, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to conduct a risk assessment to identify risks and implement a water management program to mitigate the risk of Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by Legionella) and other waterborne pathogens. This placed the residents in the facility at risk for infectious disease. Findings Included: - On 09/17/24 at 03:00 PM, Maintenance Staff U verified he was not aware of any routine facility water management checks and verified the facility had some rooms presently unoccupied. [...]
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 31 residents with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the correct CMS Form 10055, Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), to the resident or their representative for Resident (R) 28, and R137. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding skilled services.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the necessary knowledge and competency to respond immediately when a hospice Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) removed Resident (R) R29's fentanyl (narcotic pain medication with a high risk for abuse) patch and further failed to dispose of the patch per the standards of practice and manufactures instructions. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported Resident (R) 26's as needed (PRN) Haldol (antipsychotic medication that treats mental and neurological disorders) did not have a 14-day stop date. This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteThe facility has a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)26's as-needed (PRN) antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) had a 14-day stop date. This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications and related complications.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure one of the five residents, Resident (R) 19, reviewed during the medication administration pass remained free of medication errors. This placed the resident at risk for adverse reactions from the medication.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to correctly prepare a pureed diet for three residents who required the modified textured food to retain both nutritive value and palatability. This placed the affected residents at risk for impaired nutrition and decreased quality of life.
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R)19 and R29. This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care.
January 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 28 residents with three residents reviewed for falls and accidents. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow Resident (R) 1's fall interventions, which resulted in a fall from R1's bed and R1 sustained a broken nasal bone. On 01/07/23 at 04:15 PM, staff provided care to R1 but did not replace the fall mat next to R1's bed when they left the room. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) M later found R1 lying on the floor on her stomach with her face in a pool of blood and blood running out of her nose. R1 was transferred to the emergency room where she was diagnosed with a broken nasal bone. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for injury, pain, and bruising.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 28 residents with three residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when staff administered amlodipine (medication used to treat high blood pressure) instead of amiodarone (medication used to regulate heart rate) to Resident (R) 2. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for health complications and medication-related adverse effects.
March 7, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate hand hygiene when caring for Resident (R) 9 and R 22 during incontinence cares, placing the affected residents at risk for infection.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 27 residents, with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide on the CMS form 10055, the estimated cost to continue services for skilled services to the resident or their representative for two of three reviewed residents, Resident (R)7 and R24 placing the residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding skilled services
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents of which one was reviewed for tube feeding (gastrostomy tube, directly into the stomach, used to provide liquid nourishment, fluids, and medications by bypassing oral intake), Resident (R)16. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the use of the gastrostomy tube placing R16 at risk for inappropriate care.
- D Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary for one of the residents reviewed for discharge that included a recapitulation (a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) of the resident's stay and post discharge plan for Resident (R) 27. This placed the resident at risk for receiving inadequate care.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents of which one was reviewed for tube feeding (gastrostomy tube, directly into the stomach, used to provide liquid nourishment, fluids, and medications by bypassing oral intake), Resident (R)16. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor the amount of intake of feeding and fluids administered through the gastrostomy tube, placing R16 at risk for malnutrition and dehydration and possible fluid overload.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to document appropriate indications for administration for a psychotropic (medication used to treat mental health disorders) for Resident (R)22. This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary medications and related complications.
September 2, 2021Standard inspection · 5 citations
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate Resident (R) 15's skin tears of unknown origin.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update and revise the care plan for one of five residents reviewed for accidents, Resident (R) 15.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing care and supervision to prevent accidents for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 15.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify and report to the Director of Nursing, physician, and medical director, the lack of monitoring for hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia (low or high blood glucose) for one of the five residents reviewed who received insulin injections (a protein hormone to regulate high blood glucose) on a daily basis, and the unavailability of insulin for Resident (R) 16.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 29 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor one of the five residents for hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia (low or high blood glucose) who received insulin injections (a protein hormone to regulate high blood glucose) on a daily basis, and failed to have the medication available for use for Resident (R) 16.
Fire safety inspections
37 fire safety citations on file: 11 on September 18, 2024, 19 on March 7, 2023, 7 on September 2, 2021.
Every fire safety citation37 citations
- F Use approved construction type or materials.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- E Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- F Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- F Include a process for Emergency Preparedness collaboration.
- F Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
- F Establish policies and procedures for volunteers.
- F Develop a communication plan.
- F Provide primary/alternate means for communication.
- F Provide a means of sharing information on occupancy/needs.
- F Provide family notifications of emergency plan.
- F Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- F Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- E Use approved construction type or materials.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- E Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.74 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.19 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.19 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.17 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 61.5% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.28 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.97 on weekdays and 3.19 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 11.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.02 in April to June 2025 to 3.74 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.74 | 0.38 | 3.97 | 3.19 | 11.7% | 0 of 90 | 24 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.72 | 0.41 | 3.88 | 3.33 | 7.8% | 0 of 92 | 24 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.69 | 0.40 | 3.84 | 3.31 | 5.4% | 0 of 92 | 23 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.02 | 0.41 | 4.22 | 3.50 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 22 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.1 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CHAPMAN ADULT CARE HOMES INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeardoe, Amanda | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 12/13/2022 | |
| McLaughlin, Laurie S | Corporate director | Individual | 09/27/2011 | |
| Taylor, Joan M | Corporate director | Individual | 09/27/2011 | |
| Jeardoe, Amanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/04/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on September 18, 2024: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 17, 2024: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 7, 2023: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 18, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.19 hours per resident per day, below the Kansas average of 3.60.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Enterprise Estates Nuring Center Enterprise, 7.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Tallgrass Healthcare Campus Junction City, 9.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Memorial Hospital Ltcu (village Manor) Abilene, 10.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Wakefield Care and Rehab Wakefield, 16.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Legacy at Herington Herington, 21.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
Common questions
- What is Chapman Valley Manor's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Chapman Valley Manor 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Chapman Valley Manor get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 18, 2024. The Kansas average is 9.5.
- Has Chapman Valley Manor been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Chapman Valley Manor accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Chapman Valley Manor?
- CMS lists 4 owners and managers. Legal business name: CHAPMAN ADULT CARE HOMES INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.