Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Weatherford

College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center

1715 Martin Dr, Weatherford, TX 76086 · Parker County · (817) 458-3100

120 certified beds, about 90 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2009

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676212 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 14, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 11 health citations since February 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $38,675 in the last three years; the largest was $38,675, and the latest is dated February 20, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.21 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.26 of those hours.

56.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Priority Management, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
2E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 14, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biological used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 (hall 400 nurse cart) of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to keep each resident's medications in their original containers and stored separately. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving expired and/or improper medications. During an observation on [DATE] at 8:45 AM of the nurse's medication cart for hall 400 revealed, 2 loose pills were found in the bottom of the second drawer of the cart. [...]
March 27, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: The facility failed to ensure: A. 1 of 1 walk-in coolers were clean and free from sticky substances. B. Kitchen floor on the left side and underneath 1 of 1 ice machines were clean and from a brown sticky substance and dust. The facility's failure could place residents receiving oral nutritional intake at risk for foodborne illness and a decline in health status.
  2. E
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 (2 Dumpsters) of 2 garbage containers reviewed for food safety requirements. The facility failed to ensure two dumpsters in the parking lot was not overflowing with garbage. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of food borne illness, illnesses, or be provided a unsafe, unsanitary and uncomfortable environment.
February 20, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. J
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement abuse, neglect policies that addresses screening of a potential employee's license which resulted in an employee being allowed to work as a nurse with no license or education check for 1 (Staff Member G) of 24 staff . The facility failed to screen Staff Member G to ensure she was licensed to practice as a GVN through the TX-BON. As a result Staff Member G was allowed to provide care and services to residents outside of her scope that included administration of medications that included PICC line normal saline flushes, short, long, sliding scale insulins and narcotics, wound care for stage III (3) wounds, monitoring of dialysis ports, PICC lines, and catheters with no direct supervision and providing supervision to certified nurse aides and medication aides. [...]
  2. J
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    F839 · Administration · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure professional staff was licensed in accordance with applicable State laws for 1 (Staff Member G) of 24 personnel reviewed for licensed nursing. The facility failed to verify if Staff Member G was licensed to practice as a GVN through the TX-BON. As a result, Staff Member G was allowed to provide care/services/treatment to residents including PICC line normal saline flushes, short, long and sliding scale insulins, narcotics administration, stage 3 wound care, monitoring of dialysis ports and catheters for 26 of 92 residents on 400 hall. An Immediate Jeopardy to residents' health and safety was identified on 02/16/24. The Immediate Jeopardy Template was provided to the ADM on 02/16/24 at 8:55PM. [...]
  3. F
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    F865 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate and maintain and effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program that focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The facility's QAPI plan had not been reviewed annually for need revisions. This failure placed the residents at risk for a decreased quality of care and decreased quality of life within their living environment.
  4. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #17 and #55) whose records were reviewed for baseline care plans following admission to the facility, in that: 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a baseline care plan had not been developed within 48 hours following her admission to the facility. 2. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a baseline care plan had not been developed within 48 hours following his admission to the facility. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs and to promote physical and mental health and well-being within their new living environment.
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, 1 of 8 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included her weight bearing status for Resident #40 or that she should wear a knee brace. This failure could place the resident at risk for injury and providers not having the most current information for the Resident's plan of care.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one 1 of 2 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for infection control practices. CNA H failed to clean bedside table before setting supplies up for incontinent care. CNA H failed to change gloves between clean and dirty brief change during incontinence care. CNA H failed to wipe from front to back during cleansing peri area including not cleansing from labia folds thru urethral opening. This failure could affect the 24 residents on hall 400 who were occasionally or frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel by placing them at risk for the spread of infection.
  7. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 Medication rooms. 1. Discontinued medications were stored in an unsecured plastic box beneath the desk of ADON A. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential harm from access to medications that were controlled drugs and were not prescribed for their medical conditions.
  8. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, which were complete and accurate for 1 of 8 residents (Resident # 43) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure physician orders were written for Resident #40. This failure could place residents at risk of having errors in care and treatment.

Fire safety inspections

5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 14, 2026, 2 on March 27, 2025, 1 on February 20, 2024.

Every fire safety citation5 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · May 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · May 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · March 27, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · March 27, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · February 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
February 20, 2024Fine $38,675

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.213.393.86
Registered nurses0.260.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.832.983.42
Nurse aides1.81
Licensed practical nurses1.14
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)56.0%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.00 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.37 on weekdays and 2.83 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 19.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.31 in April to June 2025 to 3.21 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.210.263.372.83 19.1%0 of 9090
Oct to Dec 20253.160.283.422.51 8.7%0 of 9290
Jul to Sep 20253.230.143.442.72 10.6%8 of 9290
Apr to Jun 20253.310.123.512.80 7.5%7 of 9187
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.515.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.40.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.83.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.61.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.714.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.03.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.39.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
26.525.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.612.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.32.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.42.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

51.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 140 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 182 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

10.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 116 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

62.8% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 86 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.8% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 134 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.3% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 134 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PARKER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Priority Management, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Parker County Hospital District5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/15/2025
Bauder Family Investments, LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization01/15/2025
Boulware St. James LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization01/15/2025
Pmg Realco - College Park LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization02/28/2025
Steven Boulware Family Investments LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization01/15/2025
Bauder, Kelly5% or greater mortgage interestIndividual01/15/2025
Bauder, Madison5% or greater mortgage interestIndividual01/15/2025
Bauder, Parker5% or greater mortgage interestIndividual01/15/2025
Boulware, Sandra5% or greater mortgage interestIndividual01/15/2025
Boulware, Thomas5% or greater mortgage interestIndividual01/15/2025
Walker, Katie5% or greater mortgage interestIndividual01/15/2025
Bacus, RandyCorporate directorIndividual05/01/2017
Pmg Opco - College Park LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/15/2025
Bauder, WilliamOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/15/2025
Boulware, StevenOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/15/2025
Wahrman, ChadOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/15/2023
Bauder Family Investments, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2015
Boulware St. James LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Bridgepointe Finanical Services, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Innovative Nurse Consulting, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Pmg Opco - College Park LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/21/2025
Pmg Realco - College Park LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/28/2025
Priority Management Group, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Steven Boulware Family Investments LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Bauder, KellyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025
Bauder, MadisonAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025
Bauder, ParkerAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025
Bauder, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025
Boulware, DouglasAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025
Boulware, SandraAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025
Boulware, StevenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025
Boulware, ThomasAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025
Wahrman, ChadAdp of the SNFIndividual08/15/2023
Walker, KatieAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025
Wusterhausen, KrisAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 20, 2024: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 27, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 20, 2024: "Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.83 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on May 14, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $38,675 in the last three years.
Does College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center?
CMS lists 36 owners and managers, and links the home to Priority Management. Legal business name: PARKER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection