Coosa Valley Health and Rehab
513 Pineview Avenue, Glencoe, AL 35905 · Etowah County · (256) 492-5350
124 certified beds, about 75 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1977
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 015174 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 29, 2022, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Alabama average is 4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 23 health citations since July 2018 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.05 hours per resident per day, against 3.88 across Alabama and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
53.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Alabama average 46.9%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
April 29, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Perineal Care, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to RI (Resident Identifier) #43 in a timely manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect RI #43, one of one resident sampled for incontinence care.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #31, had documented medical justification for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice affected RI #31; one of seven residents reviewed for catheter use.
June 13, 2019Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of the Food Code United States Public Health Service facility failed to ensure: 1) ice cream cups in the walk-in freezer were frozen solid, 2) opened items in the walk-in freezer were properly resealed, 3) walk-in freezer was maintained at a temperature to ensure food items were frozen solid, and 4) a dietary aide did not continue to serve trays after dropping the handle of the thermometer into the gravy. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 86 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: The Food Code U.S. Public Health Service 2017 indicates the following: . Temperature and Time Control 3-501.11 Frozen Food. Stored froze Foods shall be maintained frozen. . 3-202.15 Package Integrity. Food packages shall . [...]
- F Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights and a facility document titled, Maintenance Supervisor Job Description, the facility failed to ensure Room Locators (RL)'s #1-63 were free of chipped paint on walls and doors, missing tiles on floors, missing curtains on closets, equipment in disrepair and worn furniture. This was observed three of three days of the survey and affected 63 of 66 rooms on four of four halls of the facility. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights, no date, page 5, revealed: . 9. Safe environment. The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, . A review of a facility document titled, Maintenance Supervisor Job Description, no date, revealed: . Ensure the building(s), equipment and utilities are maintained in good working order . [...]
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, medical record review and review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #65's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments did not have Gabapentin, an anticonvulsant medication, coded as an antipsychotic, which resulted in the assessments being inaccurate for use of antipsychotic medication. This deficient practice affected RI #65, one of 24 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of CMS's RAI Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 3: MDS Items (N), Page N-6, documented: . Coding Tips and Special Populations * Code medications in Item N0410 according to the medication's therapeutic category and/or pharmacological classification, not how it is used. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #87's care plan regarding code status was revised to reflect RI# 87's DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) decision. This affected RI # 87, one of twenty-four residents whose care plans were reviewed for code status. Findings Include: RI# 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, Cirrhosis of Liver, Ascites and Vascular Dementia. On 06/13/19 at 01:30 PM, a review of RI #87's medical record revealed a DNR order was written on 05/28/2019, along with an Advance Directive depicting the family's wishes of DNR. Further review revealed a Full Code Care Plan initiated on 04/22/2019 and reviewed by the facility on 05/27/2019, RI #87's Facesheet also depicted Full Code and did not reflect RI #87's decision for DNR. [...]
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, interviews, and review of a facility polity titled Enteral Nutrition, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #9's tube feeding was infusing at 60 ml (milliters) /(an) hr (hour) and tube feeding water flush was infusing at 25 ml (milliliters) /(an) hr( hour) as ordered by the physician. This was observed on 6/12/2019 and affected one of six resident sampled to receive tube feeding and feeding tube water flush. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Enteral Nutrition, with a revised date of 11/2018, revealed, .Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 11. The nurse confirms .orders for . e. Volume and rate of administration; . RI # 9 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, medical record review and review of [NAME] and [NAME] Fundamentals of Nursing Ninth Edition, Chapter 23 Legal Implications in Nursing Practice, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was accurately transcribed for Resident Identifier (RI) #87's code status. This affected RI #87, one of 24 sampled residents for whom medical records were reviewed. Findings Include: Review of [NAME] and [NAME] Fundamentals of Nursing Ninth Edition, Chapter 23 Legal Implications in Nursing Practice, copyright 2017, page 311, revealed the following: . Health Care Providers' Orders . Make sure that all health care provider orders are in writing . and transcribed correctly . RI #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Cirrhosis of Liver, Ascites and Vascular Dementia. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and review of facility policies titled, Standard Precautions and Instillation of Eye Drops, the facility failed to ensure: 1. a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) did not place inhaler mouthpieces on an unclean surface prior to putting them on RI #28's inhalers before storing them in the medication cart, and 2. an LPN did not wear the same gloves she wore while administering RI #1's crushed medication with an ice cream spoon and then administer RI #1's eye drops. These deficient practices affected RI #1 and RI #28, two of four residents and two of four nurses observed during medication pass observations. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled, Standard Precautions, Revised October 2018, documented: Standard precautions include the following practices: . 5. Resident-Care Equipment soiled . are handled in a manner that prevents . [...]
July 26, 2018Standard inspection · 14 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with knowledge of what an Advance Directive was and provide proof of whether they wanted to formulate one or not. This deficient practice affected Resident Identifiers (RI) #'s 11, 22,33, 36, 41, 45, 46, 50, 55, 57, 60, 62, 67, 68, 73, 76, 77 and 83, 18 of 22 sampled residents reviewed for implementation of Advance Directives.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #44 did not self administer a nebulizer treatment after being assessed as not having the ability to self administer medication. The affected one of one resident observed administering a nebulizer treatment. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications dated December 2012, revealed the following: Medications shall be administered in a safe . manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 24. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision - making capacity to do so safely. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and a facility policy titled, .Quality of Life-Accommodation of Needs, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) # 22 was given a choice for method of bathing. This affected one of one sampled resident who expressed a concern regarding baths.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, and a facility's policy titled, . - Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #88's MAR (Medication Administration Record) was not left open to public view. This affected (RI) #88, one of three residents observed during medication administration. Findings Include: The facility's policy titled, . - Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy with a revised date of October 2017, revealed the following information: Policy Statement Our facility will protect and safeguard resident confidentiality and personal privacy. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed, 2. The facility will strive to protect the resident's privacy regarding his or her: .b. medical treatment . 4. Access to resident personal and medical records will be limited to authorized staff . [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and the facility policy titled, . Care Plan, Comprehensive Person - Centered, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently followed Resident Identifier (RI) #85's care plan for self care deficit with eating by not providing a weighted spoon during the breakfast and lunch meal on 07/24/18. This affected one of 23 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review, and a review [NAME] and Perry's FUNDAMENTALS OF NURSING, the facility failed to ensure staff followed Resident Identifier's (RI) #85's physician's order for a weighted spoon. This affected one of 23 sampled residents whose physician's orders were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of [NAME] and Perry's FUNDAMENTALS OF NURSING Ninth Edition, page 311 revealed the following: . Health Care Providers' Orders.follow health care providers' orders . Resident Identifier (RI) #85 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Autistic Disorder and Other Intellectual Disabilities. A review of RI #85's July 2018 Physician's Orders revealed an order for WEIGHTED SPOON WITH EACH MEAL. The order/start date was 01/12/18. On 07/24/18 at 8:13 AM, RI #85 was observed sitting up in bed for breakfast. [...]
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, activity participation records, record review and the facility's policy titled, Activities Policies and Procedures Manual, the facility failed to provide Resident Identifier (RI) #55 with activities of choice from March 2018 to July 2018. The facility further failed to provide RI #73 with activities of choice on three of three days of the survey. This affected two of 23 sampled residents whose activity records were reviewed. Findings Include: The facility's policy titled, Activities Policies and Procedures Manual, with a revised date of October 29,2014 revealed: Procedure: . 2) The department will continuously offer residents a wide range of activities program opportunities so that they may explore any and all potential leisure interests. 5) The department will continue to invite residents to group programs, one-to-one activities contacts, . [...]
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and a review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube, the facility failed to ensure a licensed staff member administered water flushes in a Gastrostomy Tube (GT) in between each medication administration. The facility further failed to ensure the licensed staff diluted each crushed medication with at least 15 cubic centimeters (cc) of water for administration to Resident Identifier (RI) #39. This affected one of one residents observed during medication administration via a GT. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, . Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube, revised April 2018, was conducted. The purpose of the policy was to provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications through an enteral tube. General Guidelines included the following, . 4. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, review of Record of Destruction forms and a review of the facility's policy titled, Discarding and Destroying Medications, the facility failed to ensure drug destruction records contained the method of destruction from February 2018 to May 2018. This affected four months of Record of Medication Destruction forms reviewed. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Discarding and Destroying Medications with a revised date of October 2014, revealed the following: . Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 10. The medication disposition record will contain the following: f. Method of disposition; . A review of the facility's Record of Medication Destruction forms from February 2018 to May 2018, revealed no method of destruction was listed on the forms provided to the surveyor. [...]
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. There were a total of 26 opportunities observed during medication administration with five errors. The medication error rate was 19.23 %. This deficient practice affected RI (Resident Identifier) #39, one of four residents observed during medication administration.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review and a review of the facility policy titled, Accuracy and Quality of Tray Line Service, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #83 and RI #67 received fried eggs for breakfast on 07/24/18 and 07/25/18 as requested. This affected two of 23 residents observed during meals. Findings Include: A review of the facility policy titled,Accuracy and Quality of Tray Line Service with a 2010 date, revealed the following: . 7. Each tray will be checked for: . *Special requests (food preferences) . 1) RI #83 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of RI #83's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively intact. A review of RI #83's care plan for at risk for alteration in nutritional status and weight fluctuation, with an onset date of 03/13/18 revealed: . [...]
- D Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review, and the facility's policies titled, Assisting the Resident with In-Room Meals, and Adaptive Eating Devices, the facility failed to ensure RI #85's weighted spoon was provided during the breakfast and lunch meals on 07/24/18. This affected one of one resident observed for weighted utensil use during meals. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Assisting the Resident with In-Room Meals with a revised date of December 2013 revealed: Purpose .The purpose of this procedure is to provide assistance for residents who choose to receive meals in their rooms . 4. Ensure that the necessary non-food items, ( . special devices, .) are on the tray. Equipments and Supplies The following equipment and supplies will be necessary when performing this procedure: . 3. Special feeding devices (as indicated) . [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and a facility policy titled, Standard Precautions Infection Control, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands before gloves were applied, after gloves were removed and before touching personal items of residents. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) # 88 and #39, two of four residents observed during medication administration.
- C Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and review of the facility's policy titled, . Environmental Services Policies and Procedures, the facility failed to ensure vinyl gloves were secured in bags inside the dumpsters and were not lying loose on the ground outside of the dumpsters. This had the potential to attract rodents and pests. This was observed on one of three days of the survey and had the potential to affect all 95 residents that reside in the facility.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Alabama | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.05 | 3.88 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.63 | 3.26 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.58 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.95 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.6% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 63.6% | 39.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.51 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.22 on weekdays and 3.63 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.30 in April to June 2025 to 4.05 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.05 | 0.52 | 4.22 | 3.63 | 0.8% | 0 of 90 | 75 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.12 | 0.53 | 4.43 | 3.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 66 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.68 | 0.39 | 5.00 | 3.87 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 62 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.30 | 0.54 | 4.60 | 3.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 62 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Alabama, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.63 | 4.13 | 3.27 | 0.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Alabama | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 12.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 12.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.2 | 21.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.9 | 24.8 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.2 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 29, 2022: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2019: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2019: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 26, 2018: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- McGuffey Health & Rehabilitation Center Gadsden, 5.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Northside Health Care Gadsden, 6.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Gadsden Health and Rehab Center Gadsden, 6.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Attalla Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Attalla, 10.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Jacksonville Health and Rehabilitation, LLC Jacksonville, 13.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Piedmont Health Care Center Piedmont, 18.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 3 citations
- Cherokee County Health and Rehabilitation Center Centre, 20.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Anniston Health and Rehab Services Anniston, 21.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 4 citations
Alabama contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Alabama. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Alabama Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Provider Standards, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Alabama Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 334-242-5753. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Alabama Health Care Facilities Deficiencies, where Alabama publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Coosa Valley Health and Rehab's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Coosa Valley Health and Rehab 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Coosa Valley Health and Rehab get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 29, 2022. The Alabama average is 4.
- Has Coosa Valley Health and Rehab been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Coosa Valley Health and Rehab accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Coosa Valley Health and Rehab?
- CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.