Home / California / San Pablo
Creekside Healthcare Center
1900 Church Lane, San Pablo, CA 94806 · Contra Costa County · (510) 235-5514
80 certified beds, about 70 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1970
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055099 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 8, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 21 health citations since May 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.13 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.85 of those hours.
38.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
CMS links it to Mariner Health Care, an affiliated group of 17 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
February 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to provide Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP) copies of requested medical records within the required timeframe when she requested Resident 1's medical records by mail on [DATE] and sent the same request with documents via fax on [DATE]. The requested medical records were not released until [DATE] after the RP got a lawyer to make the same request on her behalf. This failure resulted in a delay in obtaining Resident 1's medical records, causing RP undue concern pertaining to obtaining the requested medical records.
August 8, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 18, and Resident 45) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) were screened and referred to the appropriate state mental authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination.(PASRR is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are appropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care). This failure had the potential to prevent residents from receiving appropriate required mental health services. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were observed by one of one sampled laundry staff (LS) when the LS was not wearing a gown while moving soiled linen from the soiled linen hamper in to the washer. This failure had the potential for cross contamination and spread of infections among 72 residents at the facility. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/7/25 at 10:09 a.m. with the LS and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in the laundry room, the LS was observed grasping soiled linen from the hamper in to the washer only with gloved hands. The LS stated she had never used a gown or was told to use a gown when putting the dirty linen in to the machine. The LS stated wearing the gown could protect staff and other residents from the spread of infection. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine medications to meet the needs of one of two sampled residents (Resident 62) and ensured controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) were accurately reconciled for two of three sampled residents (Resident 3 and 39) when:1. Resident 62's basaglar insulin (medication used to help manage blood sugar levels) and epogen (medication used to treat anemia, a condition where the blood doesn't carry enough oxygen to the rest of the body) were not available for administration. These failures resulted in Resident 62 to not receive medications as ordered by the physician.2. Resident 3 and 39's controlled drug records were documented illegibly. [...]
May 24, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for flies and gnats in three of three units designated for resident care. A dead kitten was found outside Resident 24's window for more than 22 hours. The failure to effectively treat flies and gnats and leaving the dead kitten outside Resident 24's room resulted in Resident 24 feeling ugly and grossed out and had the potential to result in infection for all residents residing at the facility.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 %. During the medication pass, three medication errors were observed out of 32 opportunities for three of six residents, resulting in an error rate of 9.38%. 1. Amlodipine (medication for management of high blood pressure) for Resident 1 was unavailable and not administered as ordered. This failure had the potential to result in uncontrolled high blood pressure. 2. Semglee pen U-100 insulin (Insulin Glargine, a long acting insulin) subcutaneous injection was administered to Resident 45 without following manufacturer's recommendation. This failure had the potential to affect the insulin dose's effectiveness and the resident's blood sugar. 3. [...]
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications and biologicals (a class of medications which are grown and then purified from large-scale cell cultures of bacteria or yeast, or plant or animal cells) in a safe condition when the temperature in one of two medication refrigerators was out of range in accordance with Federal, State, and CDC storage and handling guidelines. This failure had the potential to compromise the integrity and effectiveness of medications and biologicals and could potentially cause harm to the resident. During a concurrent interview and observation of medication refrigerator 2 (med fridge 2) on 5/21/24 at 11:55 a.m. with RN2, in medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER], the thermometer inside med fridge 2 indicated 32 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F). [...]
- E Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for three of three sampled residents (Resident 49, Resident 65 and Resident 68) reviewed for arbitration (a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several other individuals can make a decision about the dispute [disagreement or claim among parties where one party claims to have been harmed] after receiving evidence and hearing arguments) agreement, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement was explained in a manner they understood. This failure had the potential to result in violation of the residents' right to make informed decisions and choices about important aspects of healthcare and welfare.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess one of four sampled residents (Resident 322) for right forearm swelling. This failure resulted in Resident 322 experiencing pain and limited range of motion of the right arm, and placed Resident 322 at risk of untreated edema, further pain skin damage, and fluid overload.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment and a safe transfer to prevent accident for one of eight sampled (Resident 2) when Resident 2 fell from the Hoyer lift during transfer from bed to chair by a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) and a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 sustaining a superficial scalp laceration and hematoma due to the witnessed fall from the Hoyer lift.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services when Resident 1's medication, amlodipine (medication used to treat high blood pressure) was not available and not administered as ordered. This failure had the potential to result in uncontrolled high blood pressure for Resident 1 During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, undated, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in December 2019 with diagnoses that included hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and dementia. During a concurrent medication pass observation and interview on 5/22/24 at 9:18 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 checked Resident 1's blood pressure and stated Resident's BP was 125/58. LVN stated order indicated to hold if Systolic BP is less than 100. [...]
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 68) received quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication, a class of medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) without an appropriate indication for use or appropriate behavior monitoring. This failure resulted in Resident 68's behavior not being appropriately monitored for the use of quetiapine and placed Resident 68 at risk of experiencing untreated psychosocial distress.
- D Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to report the fall incident of Resident 2 to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and other appropriate agencies, as required by the federal or state regulations. This failure had the potential in delay of investigation and affects the health, safety, or welfare of residents.
April 11, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after an identified concern for one of three sample selected residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 informed the staff of the facility about his sensitivity to the scents. The facility did not make a care plan and follow up with Resident 1's concern. This failure resulted in frustration for Resident 1 and having to inform each of the staff himself about his issue with scents.
May 5, 2022Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage when the eye drops and ear drops were stored next to each other in green and white boxes and there was an expired 1000 ml (milliliter) bag of 10% Dextrose (sugar water solution given intravenously or into the vein) in the medication storage room. These failures had the potential for medication errors to occur (for example, administering ear medication into the eye which could cause blindness) or or the resident to receive expired intravenous (IV) fluids.
- E Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow a current seasonal menu and meal plan when the facility used the Fall/Winter 2021 menu to prepare the residents' meals. This deficient practice did not ensure seasonal foods which offer variety, palatability, and nutritional value were made available to residents.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve palatable food when the facility served chicken rice soup that was too salty. This deficient practice had the potential to cause residents to not enjoy their meal and decline to eat.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food storage practices as follows: a. Dishwashing racks with brownish discoloration, b. Plate covers had a faded, discolored appearance c. Air vent had a thick layer of black dust. These deficient practices had the potential to result in foodborne illness.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 274) of two sampled residents (Resident 47 and 274) was free from physical abuse when; Resident 47 grabbed Resident 274 on the back of the neck during an altercation in the lobby area. This deficient practice resulted in repeated episodes of resident to resident altercation and had the potential to cause emotional distress, pain, and injury.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to revised one of two sampled residents (Resident 47) care plans with new interventions to address Resident 47's aggressive arguments and complaint. This deficient practice did not ensure interventions were developed and implemented to avoid repeat altercations.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, for one (Resident 27) of five random sampled resident charts reviewed for their pneumonia vaccination, the facility failed to offer the pneumococcal vaccine recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices (ACIP-group of medical a public health experts) based on the age group and had no medical contraindication against it. This failure increased the risk and potential for Resident 27 to acquire, transmit or experience complications from pneumococcal disease.
Fire safety inspections
21 fire safety citations on file: 1 on February 19, 2026, 1 on August 8, 2025, 1 on July 21, 2025, 9 on May 24, 2024, 9 on May 5, 2022.
Every fire safety citation21 citations
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.
- E Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- E Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- E Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
- D Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- D Provide primary/alternate means for communication.
- D Use approved construction type or materials.
- D Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.13 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.85 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.74 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.55 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.74 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.8% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.7% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.60 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.29 on weekdays and 4.74 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.98 in April to June 2025 to 5.13 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.13 | 1.85 | 5.29 | 4.74 | 2.5% | 0 of 90 | 70 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.95 | 1.58 | 5.09 | 4.58 | 1.3% | 0 of 92 | 70 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.18 | 1.58 | 5.35 | 4.76 | 3.4% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.98 | 1.51 | 5.11 | 4.65 | 3.1% | 0 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.9 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.6 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.1 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.9 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.0 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.6 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CREEKSIDE OPERATING COMPANY LP. CMS links this home to Mariner Health Care, a group of 17 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gc Holding Company 2 LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 99% | 06/30/2015 |
| Grancare LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2015 | |
| Mariner Health Care, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2015 | |
| Mhc Holding Company | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2015 | |
| Mhc West Holding Company | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2015 | |
| National Senior Care, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2015 | |
| Grunstein, Emily | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/06/2019 | |
| Rotich, Janet | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/30/2015 | |
| Sarcauga, Dennis | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/06/2025 | |
| Dhugga, Gurpreet | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Kaur, Navjot | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/09/2026 | |
| Rotich, Janet | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/24/2000 | |
| Sarcauga, Dennis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/06/2025 | |
| Creekside Holding Company Gp LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 06/30/2015 | |
| Gc Holding Company 2 LLC | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 06/30/2015 | |
| Dhugga, Gurpreet | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Kaur, Navjot | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/09/2026 | |
| Rotich, Janet | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/24/2000 | |
| Sarcauga, Dennis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/06/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on August 8, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 8, 2025: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 5, 2022: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 8, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Vale Healthcare Center San Pablo, 0.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 49 citations
- San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center San Pablo, 0.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 42 citations
- Richmond Post Acute Care Richmond, 0.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Greenridge Post Acute El Sobrante, 2.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Shields Richmond Nursing Center Richmond, 2.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Shields Nursing Center El Cerrito, 4.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Chaparral House Berkeley, 6.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Kyakameena Care Center Berkeley, 7.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 40 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Creekside Healthcare Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Creekside Healthcare Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Creekside Healthcare Center get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 8, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Creekside Healthcare Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Creekside Healthcare Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Creekside Healthcare Center?
- CMS lists 19 owners and managers, and links the home to Mariner Health Care. Legal business name: CREEKSIDE OPERATING COMPANY LP.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.