Find a nursing home

Home / California / Richmond

Shields Richmond Nursing Center

1919 Cutting Blvd, Richmond, CA 94804 · Contra Costa County · (510) 233-8513

84 certified beds, about 77 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055292 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 17, 2025, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 43 health citations since May 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.25 of those hours.

18.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
23D
11E
7F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
2B
0C
March 10, 2026Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    F627 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), was discharged in a safe manner to another skilled nursing facility when discharging facility did not receive confirmation of agreement to admit Resident 1 from the receiving facility before Resident 1 was discharged and transferred. This failure resulted in the inability for Resident 1 to be accepted for admission at the receiving facility and for Resident 1 being sent to the GACH emergency department. [...]
  2. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when; Resident 1 was not given showers as scheduled by the facility. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for poor hygiene, body odor, infection, and transmission of diseases. During a review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 12/2/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIM score of fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.) score was 09 and indicated moderately impaired mental status. [...]
  3. D
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserved flavor. This failure placed facility residents at risk of unplanned weight loss, a consequence of poor food intake. During an interview on 3/5/26, at 10:45 a.m., with Resident 2, Resident 2 lay in bed in his room awake and verbally responsive. Resident 2 stated that he has his own stack of food kept at his bedside because sometimes the food served is not edible. Resident 2 stated, for example, French fries were hard and unable to be eaten, meat served for dinner was very tough. Resident 2 stated he was not able to cut the meat with a knife. Resident 2 stated he had reported to nursing staff and Dietary Supervisor (DS). During an interview on 3/5/26, at 11:52 a.m., with Dietary Supervisor (DS), DS stated she was recently hired. DS stated she was not aware of any food concerns. [...]
April 17, 2025Standard inspection · 13 citations
  1. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four sampled residents (Resident 18, 33, 14 and 7), received activities of daily living (ADL) care when the following was noted: 1. Resident 18 had long fingernails with black matter underneath both hands. 2. Resident 33 had long fingernails with black matter underneath both hands. 3. Resident 14 had overgrown fingernails. 4. Resident 7, who was dependent on staff, was not turned and repositioned every two hours as indicated in the care plan.
  2. E
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for three of 22 sampled residents (Resident 41, 20 and 5), the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 41 did not receive multiple medications that included anti-hypertensives (blood pressure lowering medications), stool softeners and phosphate binders, according to physician's orders. This failure had the potential for complications that included hypertensive emergency (a severe and immediate medical condition characterized by dangerously high blood pressure and signs of end-organ damage, such as to the brain, heart, or kidneys), and hyperphosphatemia (or high phosphorus levels in the blood, a common and serious complication in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). 2. [...]
  3. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was less than 5 percent for three out of eight sampled Residents (Resident 25, 57, and 270). This failure had the potential for negative health outcomes.
  4. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices when two expired medications in a medication cart were available for use. These failures had the potential to result in Residents receiving expired and ineffective medications.
  5. E
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Dietary Services Manager (DSM) in the absence of a full-time Registered Dietitian (DC) for 64 Residents who received food from the kitchen. This failure had the potential for the residents' nutritional needs not to be met; and dietary staff were not supervised by a qualified person.
  6. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions when: 1. [NAME] 1 prepared food in the emergency three compartment sink. 2. Open package pasta was not stored in airtight container. 3. 12 Quart clear container stored multiple sprouted, soft, and wrinkled red potatoes. 4. Powdered sugar in tin can labeled with used by 4/10/25. 5. One and half pint cherry tomatoes was not labeled and dated with used by. 6. 12 Quart full container with wrinkled, mushed, liquified cherry tomatoes were stored. 7. Unlabeled 12 ounce (oz - unit of measurement) clear plastic container contained; a. four green bell peppers that were extremely soft with white fuzzy matter and discoloration; b. three wrinkled red bell peppers had caked in black matter and white fuzzy discoloration, two yellow peppers were wrinkled. 8. [...]
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide proper supervision to one of two Residents (Resident 1) during transfer from bed to wheelchair using Hoyer Lift [(a mechanical assistive device used by caregivers to safely transfer patients with limited mobility from one place to another (i.e. bed to wheelchair)]. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for fall and injury.
  8. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist in maintaining a sufficient food and fluid intake for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5) when Resident 5's poor meal and fluid intake were not addressed in a timely manner to maintain proper nutrition and hydration. This failure resulted in dehydration (dangerous loss of body fluid causes by illness or inadequate fluid intake) and potential for malnutrition (condition that develops when the body is deprived of vitamins, minerals and other nutrients it needs to maintain healthy tissues and organ function) and further decline in Resident 5's health condition.
  9. D
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident when Registered Nurse (RN) 2, who failed to observe infection control procedures for contact precautions and identify a change in resident's bowel elimination status, did not complete annual competency/skills evaluation. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe resident care.
  10. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 59) reviewed for psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication use, the facility failed to ensure Resident 59 received antipsychotic medication (treats mental disorders, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) with appropriate indication. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary adverse reactions from the medication.
  11. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control procedures were followed when: -Housekeeping Aide (HA) did not disinfect Resident 169's room, a contact precaution (a set of infection control practices used to prevent the spread of germs through direct or indirect contact. These precautions are implemented when a patient has a disease that can be transmitted by touching the patient, contaminated surfaces, or objects in their environment) room, with appropriate disinfectant. -Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not disinfect medical device with appropriate disinfectant in between resident use. This failure had the potential to result in spreading Clostridium difficile (C. diff, a bacteria that causes diarrhea and colitis (inflammation of the colon). [...]
  12. D
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for one randomly selected resident (Resident 369), the facility failed to establish and implement infection prevention and control program that included antibiotic stewardship program when: -Resident 369 was administered antibiotics without adequate indication. -Resident 369's possible symptoms of antibiotic side effects were not monitored. This failure had the potential to result in the development of antibiotic-resistant infections (occur when bacteria develop the ability to withstand the effects of antibiotics, making them difficult or impossible to treat, can be serious and even life-threatening, often requiring longer hospital stays, more expensive treatments, and potentially toxic medications).
  13. B
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    F912 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square foot of space per resident for 31 residents who occupied 12 multi-bed bedrooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in lack of sufficient space for the provision of care both routine and emergency and for residents to have their personal belongings at bedside.
December 11, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Treatment Nurse 1 (TN 1) did not perform hand hygiene (handwash with soap and water or alcohol-based hand rub) in between glove changes during the wound dressing change. This failure had the potential to result in infection and spread of infection.
July 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services to meet the needs of two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) when: 1. The facility failed to promptly refer Resident 2 for dental services, within three days as required, when Resident 2's tooth was chipped. 2. The facility did not provide timely dental services to obtain full dentures for Resident 3. These failures had the potential to result in decreased food intake and potential significant weight loss for both residents.
March 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 1) was free from physical abuse when Resident 2 repeatedly hit Resident 1 on the left lower extremity. This failure had the potential to result in physical injury and psychosocial harm.
December 8, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 17 citations
  1. F
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to comply with Federal regulations related to the oversight of food service operations when the facility did not have a full-time dietitian and the requirements were not met as specified in established standards (California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4) for food service managers which required, employment of a full-time, qualified dietetic supervisor when the dietitian was not full time. The lack of a qualified, competent, and full-time supervisor resulted in staff not having adequate supervision, training, and knowledge to carry out Food and Nutrition Services in a safe and sanitary manner. [...]
  2. F
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    F802 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were competent regarding job duties when: 1. A cook did not know the appropriate method for manually cleaning soiled utensils and equipment using the 3-compartment sink. 2. A diet aide did not know the appropriate procedures for testing the strength of the sanitizer solution used for sanitizing kitchen surfaces. 3. A diet aide did not demonstrate appropriate procedures for testing the sanitizer in the dish machine. These failures had the potential to result in contamination of kitchen equipment and/or utensils leading to illness caused by pathogens (harmful organisms) for 58 residents who received food from the kitchen.
  3. F
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. the menu met the nutritional needs of the residents; 2. there was a menu for a vegetarian diet; and 3. portions for diets provided matched what was indicated in the diet manual. These failures had the potential for residents to receive meals containing nutrients at levels not appropriate for their prescribed diet leading to food related medical complications for 58 residents who received food from the kitchen.
  4. F
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable when food was bland (lacked flavor). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' dining experience which may result in poor dietary intake compromising the health and nutritional status of 58 residents who received food from the kitchen.
  5. F
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide an alternate vegetarian entrée of similar nutritive value to the regular entrée for one non-sampled resident (Resident 57). 2. Ensure peanut butter and jelly sandwiches offered as an alternate entrée were of similar nutritive value to the regular entrée. These failures had the potential to result in a decreased nutrient intake as indicated by the planned menu for 29 residents who received Regular textured food.
  6. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when the following was noted: 1. A 10-pound roll of ground beef and a 10-pound package of sausage were not thawed safely. 2. A juice dispenser was not clean. 3. A can opener was not clean. 4. Three cutting boards were not in a good condition and were not clean. 5. Dry food was not stored at least six inches off the floor. 6. Three pans were in poor condition. 7. A lowerator (plate warmer) was not clean. 8. A fan mounted to the wall inside the kitchen was not clean. 9. A vent inside the dry food storage closet was not clean. 10. [...]
  7. F
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    F813 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to have a policy and procedure to describe how food brought in by family and visitors would be stored safely for the residents. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' dining experience and possibly result in poor food intake for 58 residents who ate food by mouth.
  8. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of thirty-six sampled residents (Residents 24, 25, 56 and 215) had complete and current care plans. This failure had the potential to cause residents to not receive appropriate and adequate care thereby affecting their physical and psychosocial well-being. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/6/23 at 7:58 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 25's care plans were reviewed. DON stated Res 25 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/5/23 and was diagnosed with pneumonia. DON further stated Res 25 received antibiotics from 10/5/23 to 10/7/23. DON stated Resident 25 did not have care plans for pneumonia and antibiotic treatment and without a care plan for antibiotics, the facility would not be able to check if the antibiotic was effective and monitor for side effects. [...]
  9. E
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    F805 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document review the facility failed to ensure pureed food was the appropriate consistency. This failure had the potential for eight residents on pureed diet to aspirate (drawing food into the lungs) and/or negatively impact the residents' dining experience resulting in poor food intake compromising their nutritional status out of facility census of 58.
  10. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed proper infection control precautions to prevent spread of infection for five (Resident 16, Resident 55, Resident 21, Resident 60, and Resident 167) of 58 sampled residents when: 1) Resident 167's urinary catheter bag was touching the floor. 2) The nasal cannula for Resident 55 was not changed weekly. 3) The tube feeding for Resident 60 was not dated and labelled. 4) Nursing assistant (NA) did not perform hand hygiene after providing incontinent care to Resident 21. NA did not perform hand hygiene before entering and exiting resident rooms. 5) Registered Nurse 2(RN 2) did not change gloves and perform hand hygiene after handling Resident 16's device, and then gave medications to Resident 16 and applied eye drops. [...]
  11. E
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    F912 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square foot of space per resident for 30 residents who occupied 12 multi-bed bedrooms. This condition had the potential to result in lack of sufficient space for the provision of care both routine and emergency and for residents to have their personal belongings at bedside.
  12. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to meet the needs for one of two sampled residents (Resident 167) when the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident 167 with an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine). This deficient practice placed Resident 167 at risk for developing physical and psychosocial complications related to use the of urinary catheters including infection.
  13. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 167) had a physician order to maintain an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder that drains urine into a bag outside the body) in place after admission and indication of a medical condition for the use of the indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice placed Resident 167 at risk for developing complications related to use of urinary catheters including urinary tract infection.
  14. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to show an Interdisciplinary Team meeting was conducted after one sampled resident (Resident 19) had severe weight loss. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate resident care for one resident out of a census of 58.
  15. D
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    F744 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan for dementia (progressive decline in memory that affects the ability to perform everyday activities) was developed for one of two sampled residents (Resident 167). This failure had the potential for Resident 167 to not receive the appropriate treatment and services needed to meet her dementia care needs.
  16. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to accommodate individual needs and preferences of one (Resident 31) of three sampled residents, when Resident 31 did not have access to dietary menu. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the quality of life for Resident 31 and his needs not being met while at the facility.
  17. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to immediately report an alleged abuse allegation to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) for over 24 hours for one (Resident 31) of 3 sampled residents when Resident 31 alleged CNA 3 touched him inappropriately. This failure had potential risk of delay in investigation and affect physical and psychological well-being of residents.
May 12, 2022Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS- an assessment tool used to quid care) timely for eight of ten sampled residents (Residents 10, 11,16, 24, 37, 40, 48, and 49). This failure had the potential to delay care planning and delivery.
  2. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used in skilled nursing facilities), for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 9). This failure had the potential to delay care planning and care delivery.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the needs for one (Resident 114) of one sampled residents receiving dialysis when the facility did not develop and implement care plan for Resident 114's dialysis (treatment of kidney failure that rids your blood of unwanted toxins, waste products and excess fluids by filtering your blood) care. This deficient practice may result in Resident 114's physical, psychosocial and functional needs to go unmet.
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 61), of three sampled residents, received effective oxygen therapy when staff did not assess and monitor Resident 61's use of oxygen. This deficient practice may result in ineffective oxygen therapy.
  5. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care for one (Resident 114) that required dialysis (treatment of kidney failure that rids your blood of unwanted toxins, waste products and excess fluids by filtering your blood) when staff did not do a complete assessment before Resident 114's dialysis treatment. This deficient practice resulted in an incomplete assessment of Resident 114's dialysis access site before their dialysis treatment.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene between giving medications to two residents (Resident 21 and Resident 119) of 20 sampled residents This failure had the potential to cause or spread infections which can lead to hospitalization for Resident 21 and Resident 119, as well as the rest of the residents in the facility.
  7. B
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    F912 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square foot of space per resident for 30 residents who occupied 12 multi-bed bedrooms. This condition had the potential to result in lack of sufficient space for the provision of care both routine and emergency and for residents to have their personal belongings at bedside.

Fire safety inspections

23 fire safety citations on file: 5 on April 17, 2025, 12 on December 8, 2023, 6 on May 12, 2022.

Every fire safety citation23 citations
  1. F
    Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
    K 347 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. C
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
    K 347 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. D
    Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
    K 711 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. D
    Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
    K 919 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. D
    Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
    K 926 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. E
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · May 12, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. D
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · May 12, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  20. D
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · May 12, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  21. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · May 12, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  22. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 12, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  23. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · May 12, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.714.523.86
Registered nurses1.250.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.444.093.42
Nurse aides2.24
Licensed practical nurses0.22
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)18.2%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover27.8%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.57 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.82 on weekdays and 3.44 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.29 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.711.253.823.44 0.0%0 of 9077
Oct to Dec 20254.101.284.213.84 0.0%0 of 9268
Jul to Sep 20254.241.064.363.91 0.0%0 of 9267
Apr to Jun 20254.291.124.433.95 0.0%0 of 9165
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for California

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
California, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.90$22.04 to $26.35110,060
LPNs and LVNs$38.34$35.98 to $45.0682,850
Registered nurses$67.44$58.87 to $83.25338,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.710.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.81.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.61.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.49.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.84.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.012.015.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.92.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.11.61.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Shields Richmond Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

56.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · California: 301 better, 190 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · California: 10 better, 22 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · California: 8 better, 48 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: California59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: California0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: California0.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: California96.2% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SHIELDS NURSING CENTERS INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Shields, Monique5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual49%05/01/2001
Shields, Willie5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual11/01/1991
Shields, MoniqueCorporate directorIndividual05/01/2001
Shields, WillieCorporate directorIndividual11/03/2004
Abiad, RuelOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2019
Antigua, DarwinOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/19/2020
Booker, WhitneyOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/10/2008
Dela Cruz, RaphaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/08/2022
Dhugga, GurpreetOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2017
Gabriel, AaronOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/26/2017
Goward, AngelinaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/23/2003
Hutson, JaniceOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/15/2004
Myers, ArkitaOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/27/2010
Perdomo, MadeleneOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/19/2022
Philogene, JacquesOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/30/2020
Shields, MoniqueOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2001
Shields, WillieOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/1991
Thorpe, DonaldOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/25/2025
Abiad, RuelAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2019
Antigua, DarwinAdp of the SNFIndividual10/19/2020
Booker, WhitneyAdp of the SNFIndividual11/10/2008
Dela Cruz, RaphaelAdp of the SNFIndividual06/08/2022
Dhugga, GurpreetAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2017
Gabriel, AaronAdp of the SNFIndividual09/26/2017
Goward, AngelinaAdp of the SNFIndividual07/23/2003
Hutson, JaniceAdp of the SNFIndividual10/15/2004
Myers, ArkitaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/27/2010
Perdomo, MadeleneAdp of the SNFIndividual09/19/2022
Philogene, JacquesAdp of the SNFIndividual12/30/2020
Shields, MoniqueAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2001
Shields, WillieAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/1991
Thorpe, DonaldAdp of the SNFIndividual08/25/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on March 10, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on March 10, 2026: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2023: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.44 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.

Other nursing homes nearby

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Shields Richmond Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Shields Richmond Nursing Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Shields Richmond Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
13 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 17, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
Has Shields Richmond Nursing Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Shields Richmond Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Shields Richmond Nursing Center?
CMS lists 32 owners and managers. Legal business name: SHIELDS NURSING CENTERS INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection