Crown Center at Laurel Lake
200 Laurel Lake Dr, Hudson, OH 44236 · Summit County · (330) 650-0681
75 certified beds, about 61 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365793 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 16, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 11 health citations since August 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 16 fines totaling $93,622 in the last three years; the largest was $14,679, and the latest is dated February 20, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.27 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.65 of those hours.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.
April 16, 2026Standard inspection · 0 citations
August 4, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of potential abuse and neglect were reported to the State Agency as required. This affected three residents (#57, #58, and #67) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility census was 70.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete an investigation into allegations of physical abuse for Resident #57 and failed to complete an investigation into potential neglect for Residents #58 and #67. This affected three residents (#57, #58, and #67) of four reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility census was 70.
October 28, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place to prevent Resident #32 from falling. This affected one resident (#32) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 62.
June 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #33 was transferred in a manner that would prevent a fall with major injury. This affected one resident (Resident #33) of three residents reviewed for safe transfers. The facility census was 61. Actual harm occurred on 06/23/24 when Resident #33, who required staff assistance and use of a transfer device due to repeated falls and poor safety awareness, was transferred without the device and sustained a fall and fracture of the right femur. State Tested Nurse Aid (STNA) #384 ignored guidance from other staff and Resident's #33's spouse indicating the need to use a transfer device and attempted to transfer Resident #33 independently which resulted in Resident #33 falling. When observed by the nurse, Resident #33 was on the floor screaming in pain with her right leg externally rotated. [...]
May 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the state agency as required. This affected one resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for injury of unknown origin. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 73.
August 17, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated appropriately, and failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect 56 of 57 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#34) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 57.
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wrote3. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 06/30/23 from an acute care hospital following diagnosis and treatment of UTI (urinary tract infection). Diagnoses included acute cystitis without hematuria, benign prostatic hyperplasia, atherosclerotic heart disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and malignant neoplasm of hepatic flexure. Resident #61 was a short-term resident in the facility and was discharged back to his Independent Living apartment on 07/12/23. There was no hospitalization during his brief stay. Review of the Resident #61's discharge MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was able to verbalize his needs, understood others, made himself understood and had no apparent cognitive deficit. The assessment indicated a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. [...]
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #12's call light was accessible. This affected one resident (#12) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 57.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, family interview, review of the medical record, and review of the facility policy for restraints, the facility failed to assess the use of a body pillow which was tucked underneath of Resident #42's fitted sheet to prevent the resident getting out of bed without staff assistance. This affected one resident (#42) of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 57.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to monitor the placement and function of an assistive device (Wanderguard) to ensure Resident #32 did not elope from the facility. This affected one resident (#32) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 57.
August 19, 2021Standard inspection · 1 citation
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review, review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance and interview the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices including following contact isolation precautions (wearing a gown and gloves) and using proper hand washing for Resident #30 and utilizing proper infection control practices during a dressing change for Resident #310 to prevent the spread of infection. This affected two residents (#30 and #310) and had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility.
Fire safety inspections
14 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 16, 2026, 7 on August 17, 2023, 4 on August 19, 2021.
Every fire safety citation14 citations
- F Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- E Satisfy building requirements after a repair, renovation, modification, or change of user/occupancy.
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 20, 2024 | Fine | $4,893 |
| February 12, 2024 | Fine | $4,893 |
| January 22, 2024 | Fine | $14,679 |
| January 8, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| January 2, 2024 | Fine | $4,587 |
| December 11, 2023 | Fine | $13,762 |
| November 20, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| November 13, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| November 6, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 30, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 23, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 17, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 10, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 2, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| September 25, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| September 18, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.27 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.91 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.41 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.21 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.42 on weekdays and 3.91 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 11.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.94 in July to September 2025 to 4.27 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.27 | 0.65 | 4.42 | 3.91 | 11.6% | 0 of 90 | 61 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.15 | 0.58 | 4.29 | 3.81 | 13.8% | 0 of 92 | 64 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.94 | 0.46 | 4.06 | 3.63 | 23.4% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.2 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.4 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.5 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.2 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: LAUREL LAKE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covas, Stepanie | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/07/2012 | |
| Oster, David | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 10/01/2005 | |
| Stevens, Loretta | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Covas, Stepanie | Corporate director | Individual | 12/13/2004 | |
| Denk, Mike | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2007 | |
| Garro, Joan | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2017 | |
| Mulligan, John | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2017 | |
| Murphy, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2009 | |
| Oster, David | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2005 | |
| Oster, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2005 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 4, 2025: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 28, 2024: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 17, 2023: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 17, 2023: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Hudson Elms Nursing Center Hudson, 1.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Heritage of Hudson Hudson, 1.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- Seasons Nursing and Rehab Stow, 3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Hudson Springs Nursing and Rehab Stow, 3.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Twinsburg Post Acute Twinsburg, 4.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 73 citations
- Wayside Farm Inc Peninsula, 4.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Manor of Grande Village Twinsburg, 4.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Avenue at Macedonia Macedonia, 5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Crown Center at Laurel Lake's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Crown Center at Laurel Lake 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Crown Center at Laurel Lake get at its last inspection?
- 0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 16, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.
- Has Crown Center at Laurel Lake been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 16 fines totaling $93,622 in the last three years.
- Does Crown Center at Laurel Lake accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns Crown Center at Laurel Lake?
- CMS lists 10 owners and managers. Legal business name: LAUREL LAKE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.