2610 East Aurora Road, Twinsburg, OH 44087 · Summit County · (330) 963-3600
88 certified beds, about 80 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366346 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 2, 2024, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 27 health citations since March 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.43 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.
43.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Sprenger Health Care Systems, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents that received meals from the facility. No residents were identified as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, taste test and pureed/mechanical soft guidelines review, the facility failed to serve pureed foods at a smooth consistency for safe swallowing. This had the potential to affect four residents (#1, #22, #46, and #58) who were prescribed pureed diets of 73 residents who consumed meals from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach of Residents #37 and #176. This affected two residents (#37 and #176) of 73 residents residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #29's code status was accurately reflected in both the hard medical chart and the electronic medical record. This affected one resident (#29) of 73 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Insulin KwikPens and insulin vials were dated when opened. This affected three residents (#3, #7, and #226) of twelve residents who were identified by the facility as receiving insulin. The facility census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, review of three self-reported incidents (SRIs) and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident #52 was free from physical abuse by Resident #54. This affected one resident (Resident #52) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 76.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of safety data sheets, review of job descriptions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure corrosive toilet cleaning products were securely stored on the memory care unit. This affected one resident (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards and had the potential to affect the 11 other residents (#1, #18, #19, #38, #40, #44, #46, #47, #54, #68, and #70) the facility identified as being independently ambulatory, cognitively impaired, and resided on the memory care unit. The facility census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents currently residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to date and store opened medications properly and failed to dispose of expired medications. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for one resident (Resident #278) on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP), failed to enusre reusable non-critical care equipment was disinfected after each resident use, and failed to ensure linens for residents on TBP were processed appropriately in the laundry area. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received notice of discharge in a timely manner. This affected one resident ( Resident #20) of one resident reviewed for discharge from facility. The facility also failed to ensure written notice of hospital transfers including the reason for the transfer were given to the resident or their representative and were provided to the long term care (LTC) Ombudsman in a timely manner. This affected three residents (#30, #33, and #50) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advance directives (level of medical interventions a resident wishes to have performed in the event they experience an absence of a heartbeat or breathing) were located in the medical record. This affected two (Residents #32 and #66) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report suspicion of abuse to the State agency within the required time frame. This affected two residents (#5, and #15) of four residents reviewed regarding submitted Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs). Facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse for two residents (Residents #5 and #15). This affected two residents (Resident's #5 and #15) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain an order for dialysis upon admission for one (#279) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis services. The facility identified two current residents who received dialysis services. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were implemented to prevent one resident (Resident #7) from obtaining the code and entering a secured area on the nursing unit she resided on. This affected one resident (Resident #7) out of three residents reviewed for supervision. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to implement care planned interventions to ensure one resident's (Resident #46) incontinence care was completed timely. This affected one resident (Resident #46) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to implement care planned interventions to timely identify a significant weight loss for Resident #75 and notify the dietitian. This affected one resident (Resident #75) out of one resident reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure appropriate supervision was provided Residents #5 and #15, and failed to ensure staff were knoweldgable regarding how to approach Resident #46 to ensure timely provision of incontinence care. This affected three of 25 residents residing on the secured dementia unit. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that the pharmacist's drug reviews were reviewed and what, if any, action was taken to address the recommendations. This affected two residents (#25 and #33) of five residents (#25, #30, #31, #33, and #44) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #279 received medication per physician's order upon returning from dialysis. This affected one (Resident #279) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified two current residents receiving dialysis. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in good repair and accessible to the resident. This affected one resident (#49) of one resident reviewed for physical environment. Facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure daily posted nursing staff information was posted and timely updated. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to appropriately store, label and date bread items and frozen items in the reach in freezer. This had the potential to affect 63 residents in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident, Resident #267, who was ordered nothing by mouth. The facility census was 64.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to keep the trash dumpster area free from debris. This had the potential to affect all of the 64 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately for Residents #19, Resident #33, and Resident #41. This affected three of 17 residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications with an error rate of 5% or less. This affected Resident #20 and Resident #28, two of six residents observed receiving medications. There were two errors out of 26 opportunities resulting in an error rate of 7.69%.
21 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 2, 2024, 10 on April 22, 2022, 7 on March 7, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.43 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.13 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.94 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.2% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.78 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.56 on weekdays and 3.13 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.65 in April to June 2025 to 3.43 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.43 | 0.58 | 3.56 | 3.13 | 3.9% | 0 of 90 | 80 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.44 | 0.58 | 3.57 | 3.13 | 4.0% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.44 | 0.45 | 3.58 | 3.07 | 2.3% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.65 | 0.50 | 3.82 | 3.23 | 1.9% | 0 of 91 | 79 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.2 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.2 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.3 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Manor of Grande Village's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (43.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
43.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
6.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
30.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.
2.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GV MANOR, INC. CMS links this home to Sprenger Health Care Systems, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bluesky Healthcare Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/21/2007 |
| Hutsenpiller, Wendie | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 18% | 01/01/2008 |
| Malanowski, Kenneth | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 02/16/2007 |
| Sprenger, Nicole | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 31% | 12/11/2007 |
| Sprenger, Tracey | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 31% | 02/16/2007 |
| Fox, Emily | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Kuhn, Shannon | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Malanowki, Brandon | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Cms & Co. Management Services, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/02/2007 | |
| Agarwal, Rajesh | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/15/2007 | |
| Courtock, Melissa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/02/2002 | |
| Epperly, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/20/2022 | |
| Fox, Emily | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Gollinger, Kristen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/13/2000 | |
| Kilbane, Kevin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Kuhn, Shannon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Malanowki, Brandon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Marino-Freetage, Jaime | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2011 | |
| Micale, Jacob | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/20/2023 | |
| Tiefenbach, Katherine | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/13/2022 | |
| Bsh Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/05/2006 | |
| Citrin Cooperman and Company, LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2025 | |
| Cms & Co. Management Services, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/10/2025 | |
| Delta Health Care Consultants, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2008 | |
| Gv Rental Properties, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/05/2006 | |
| Huntington | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/02/2007 | |
| Wellspring Staffing, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/15/2021 | |
| Agarwal, Rajesh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/15/2007 | |
| Courtock, Melissa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2002 | |
| Epperly, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/20/2022 | |
| Fox, Emily | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Gollinger, Kristen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/13/2000 | |
| Hutsenpiller, Wendie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Kilbane, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Kuhn, Shannon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Malanowki, Brandon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Malanowski, Kenneth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Marino-Freetage, Jaime | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2011 | |
| Micale, Jacob | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/20/2023 | |
| Sawulski, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Skidmore, Jodi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Sprenger, Nicole | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Sprenger, Tracey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Tiefenbach, Katherine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.