Curry Village Health and Rehab of Cascadia
1 Park Avenue, Brookings, OR 97415 · Curry County · (541) 469-3111
59 certified beds, about 39 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
CMS note: This facility reported a high number of days without a registered nurse onsite.
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385165 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 7, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.59 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.65 of those hours.
53.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Cascadia Healthcare, an affiliated group of 47 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
2009/23
701/25
112/25
505/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
23D
8E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 7, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to staff a registered nurse for 8 consecutive hours per day 7 days per week for 6 out of 122 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet assessment needs.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure staff followed correct sanitation and food handling procedures to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were given the right to make informed treatment decisions for 1 of 5 residents (#20) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents and their representatives at risk for not being able to make informed treatment decisions.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' MDS assessments were completed for 3 of 8 sampled residents (#s 2, 29, and 39) reviewed for pain, unnecessary medications, and activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of activities, pain, and unmet psychosocial needs.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer pain meds per physician orders for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#50) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for unresolved pain.
December 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor the resident's right to be free from physical abuse from another resident for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for abuse. Resident 2 was sent to the emergency room with facial injuries inflicted by Resident 1. The facility identified an avoidable accident related to a failed mandated resident relocation. The facility relocated Resident 1 and 2 to another room, staff were trained and care plans were updated. Corrective actions were completed on 9/26/25. This failed practice was identified as past noncompliance.
January 30, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly in 1 of 1 resident refrigerators, failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and handled properly in 1 of 1 kitchen, and failed to keep kitchen equipment clean. This put residents at risk for food borne illnesses.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food for the residents was prepared in a manner which preserved the nutritional value for pureed texture diets. This placed residents at risk for nutritional deficits.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident (#2) observed during dining observations. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe medication regimen.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#36) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident received ROM for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for mobility. This placed residents at risk for decreased ROM.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications and failed to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 7 and 28) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medications.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility administration error rate was 7.41% with two errors in 27 opportunities. This placed residents at risk for an ineffective medication regimen.
September 22, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 20 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) and 2 of 4 halls (#s 1 and 3) reviewed for dignity and random observations. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity.
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wrote5. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 6/2002 with diagnosis including cerebral palsy (a movement disorder). An 8/3/23 Multidisciplinary Care Conference form revealed the following: -Meeting time and date were blank. -Attendance was blank. -Key review section was blank. -Resident and responsible party expectations and concerns were blank. -Comments and recommendations had notes with names of two other people who were not the resident and information about the two other people. -Recommendation section was blank. -The check boxes for care plan reviewed and updated and current orders and care plans reviewed with resident or representative and copies provided were not marked. A review of Social Services Notes for 7/2023 and 8/2023 revealed no social service notes pertaining to care conferences. [...]
- E Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a RN was available for at least eight consecutive hours per day seven days per week for 9 out of 32 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet assessment needs.
- E Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic stewardship program was implemented for 1 of 1 facility and for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for UTI. This placed residents at risk for worsening infections.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received vaccines, education, and risk and benefits for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#s 2, 7, 11, 15, and 16) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for infections and lack of information.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure preferences were honored for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for lack of support for preferences.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided advance directive information for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for end-of-life decisions not being honored.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident privacy was provided for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of privacy.
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow-up on a resident grievance in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#8) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for missing personal items.
- D Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was permitted timely return to the facility after a scheduled outpatient medical procedure for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#83) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for loss of rights to return to the facility.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified of resident hospitalization for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#15) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of advocacy by the Ombudsman's office.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a significant change MDS was completed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wrote2. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including pneumonia. Resident 19's current care plan identified problems of diabetes, use of an intravenous line for the delivery of antibiotics, dehydration related to poor intake and pain related to skin conditions. The care plan did not include: -The use of two diuretics (medication to increase urination) to treat lymphedema (blockage in the lymph system causing swelling in the arms or legs) which could lead to dehydration. -Lymphedema, diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage leading to pain and numbness), peripheral vascular disease (plaque build up restricting blood flow causing pain and leg cramps) and immobility which could cause pain. -Visual problems due to glaucoma and a cataract. -Severe kidney disease with recent consideration for dialysis (a process to eliminate toxins from the blood). [...]
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided supplies for independent in-room activities for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of meaningful activities.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 1 and 8) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient fluids were provided for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for hydration. This placed residents at risk for dehydration.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 1, 8, and 19) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for ineffective and adverse medication reactions.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided non-pharmacological interventions prior to the use of PRN psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 5 and 8) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for sedation.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 staff (#s 12 and 13) wore appropriate PPE for a resident who required aerosol generating proceduress (AGPs). This placed residents at risk for cross contamination.
- D Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received risk and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 7, 15, and 16) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for uninformed decisions.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 7, 2026, 4 on January 30, 2025, 4 on September 22, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Establish policies and procedures including evacuation.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Include a process for Emergency Preparedness collaboration.
- F Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- F Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.59 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.93 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.15 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.79 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.4% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 44.4% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.35 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.85 on weekdays and 3.93 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 22.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.98 in April to June 2025 to 4.59 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.59 | 0.65 | 4.85 | 3.93 | 22.6% | 9 of 90 | 39 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.78 | 0.65 | 5.12 | 3.91 | 21.6% | 3 of 92 | 39 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.43 | 0.83 | 4.63 | 3.90 | 14.8% | 0 of 92 | 36 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.98 | 0.99 | 5.24 | 4.32 | 7.0% | 0 of 91 | 35 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Oregon
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.96 | $22.83 to $28.40 | 14,800 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.69 | $35.11 to $43.60 | 4,260 |
| Registered nurses | $62.02 | $51.55 to $64.63 | 39,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.4 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.7 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.3 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.1 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.1 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.3 | 2.4 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: BROOKINGS OF CASCADIA, LLC. CMS links this home to Cascadia Healthcare, a group of 47 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laforte, Stephen | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 33% | 06/05/2025 |
| Nelson, Timothy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 33% | 06/05/2025 |
| Cascadia Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2023 | |
| Cascadia Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/09/2025 | |
| Hammond, Owen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Laforte, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/05/2025 | |
| Nelson, Timothy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/05/2025 | |
| Stowe, Jacki | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/29/2023 | |
| Vellody, Nita | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Brookings 1 Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/05/2025 | |
| Cascadia Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/09/2025 | |
| White Oak Healthcare Finance LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2023 | |
| Stowe, Jacki | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/18/2025 | |
| Vellody, Nita | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.93 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Crescent City Care Center Crescent City, 20.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 82 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Curry Village Health and Rehab of Cascadia's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Curry Village Health and Rehab of Cascadia 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Curry Village Health and Rehab of Cascadia get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 7, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Curry Village Health and Rehab of Cascadia been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Curry Village Health and Rehab of Cascadia accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Curry Village Health and Rehab of Cascadia?
- CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Cascadia Healthcare. Legal business name: BROOKINGS OF CASCADIA, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.