350 East Tickle Street, Dyersburg, TN 38024 · Dyer County · (731) 285-9710
123 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2009
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 445497 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 11, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Tennessee average is 4.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 18 health citations since January 2020, 8 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (6 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.53 hours per resident per day, against 3.80 across Tennessee and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
57.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Tennessee average 48.9%).
CMS links it to Champion Care, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of hazardous materials for 1 of 68 (Resident #52) sampled for accident hazards.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and provide care and services for oxygen therapy for 1 of 4 (Resident #7) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing when the facility failed to document wound care treatments for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored properly and covered for 4 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #13, #28, #41, and #136) reviewed for respiratory care and 2 of 2 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 and #4) failed to provide proper respiratory care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #22) observed for tracheostomy care.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, Maintenance Supervisor job description, User's Information Manual, review of the maintenance supervisor's logbook documentation, review of the facility's census and condition (Centers of Medicare Medicaid Services (CMS) 672), observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards when hot water temperatures were measured from 116 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 144 degrees F in 48 of 63 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #101, #102, #103, #104, #105, #106, #107, #108, #109, #110, #111, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116, #210, #211, #212, #214 #217, #218, #220, #301, #302, #304, #305, #306, #307, #308, #309, #310, #311, #313, #314 #315, #317, #318, #319, #400, #401, #402, #403, #404, #405, #406, and #407). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, Director of Maintenance job description, personnel file review, medical record review, and interview, Administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enabled the facility to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest practicable well-being of the residents. Administration failed to provide oversight to monitor and provide a safe resident environment related to hot water temperatures, to provide training of staff to prevent potential burns of residents when water temperatures rose to dangerous levels, to ensure injuries of unknown origin which could be indicative of abuse were identified and investigated, to ensure resident sitters were screened and trained for abuse, and to ensure coordination of care between the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to identify and assess residents' nutritional status. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance policy, the Quality Assurance Plan, Administrator policy, medical record review, and interview, the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to ensure an effective QAPI program when the committee did not recognize an accident hazard risk with excessively hot water temperatures in residents' rooms. The QAPI committee failed to ensure Abuse policies and procedures were followed when injuries of unknown origin which could be indicative of abuse were not identified and investigated. The QAPI committee failed to ensure resident sitters were appropriately screened for abuse, had criminal background checks, and received abuse training. The QAPI committee failed to ensure residents' nutritional status was assessed, monitored, and appropriate interventions were implemented when residents sustained severe weight loss. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure abuse screening, training, and background checks were conducted for 2 of 5 sitters (Sitter #1 and #2) which placed Resident #51 at risk for potential abuse. The facility's failure to perform screening, training, abuse registry checks, and background checks placed Resident #51 in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident). The Regional Administrator and the Regional Liaison was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy for F-600 on 1/21/2020 at 1:19 PM, in the Conference Room. The facility was cited F-600 at a scope and severity of J which is Substandard Quality of Care. An extended survey was conducted on 1/16/2020. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to identify, thoroughly investigate, and protect vulnerable residents from further abuse for injuries of unknown source that could be indicative of abuse for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #12 and #64) reviewed for abuse. The facility's failure to identify and thoroughly investigate bruising to Resident #12's left upper arm and posterior forearm and Resident #64's dark purple colored marks around the resident's neck, placed Resident #12 and #64 in Immediate Jeopardy (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident). The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F-610 on 1/17/2020 at 8:15 PM, in the Conference Room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Comprehensive Care Plan was developed for injuries of unknown origin and Care Plan interventions were followed for nutritional impairment for 3 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #12, #64, and #55) reviewed. The failure of the facility to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan for injuries of unknown origin that could be indicative of abuse with effective interventions and protect residents from further potential injury placed Resident #12 and #64 in Immediate Jeopardy. The failure of the facility to ensure Care Plan interventions were followed for nutritional impairment resulted in actual Harm when Resident #55 sustained severe weight loss. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Care Plans were revised to reflect the residents' current status for severe weight loss and pressure ulcers for 3 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #55, #33, and #74) reviewed. The failure of the facility to revise the care plans for severe weight loss with effective interventions to prevent further weight loss resulted in actual Harm when Resident #55 sustained severe weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on the Registered Dietitian Service Agreement, policy review, job description review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, and failed to accurately assess, implement, and monitor interventions to prevent severe weight loss for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #55) reviewed for weight loss. The facility's failure to identify, assess, implement, and monitor interventions to prevent severe weight loss resulted in actual Harm when Resident #55 sustained severe weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to promote and enhance the residents' dignity when staff did not close the blinds when performing pressure injury treatments, did not knock on the residents' doors prior to entering the residents' room, and did not close the blinds when weighing a resident for 5 of 25 sampled residents (Resident #75, #30, #47. #71, and #23) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide and document treatments for arterial wounds for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #47) reviewed with arterial wounds (wounds caused by poor blood perfusion and circulation to the lower extremities).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide, policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to document ordered treatments and accurately assess pressure ulcers for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #23, #32, #56, and #74) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to properly store garbage in a covered dumpster on 5 of 11 days (1/15/2020, 1/17/2020, 1/18/2020, 1/20/2020, and 1/22/2020) of the survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assess 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #36 and Resident #37) for medication self-administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on the medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately for antipsychotic medication use, pressure injuries, and anticoagulant medication use for 3 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #21, #23, and #30) reviewed.
23 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 30, 2021, 22 on January 22, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.53 | 3.80 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.12 | 3.31 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.98 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.99 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.1% | 48.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.0% | 43.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.30 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.70 on weekdays and 3.12 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.55 in April to June 2025 to 3.53 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.53 | 0.56 | 3.70 | 3.12 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.56 | 0.56 | 3.74 | 3.12 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.43 | 0.56 | 3.61 | 2.98 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.55 | 0.60 | 3.68 | 3.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 69 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Tennessee, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.56 | 3.95 | 3.27 | 4.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.09 to $19.66 | 27,040 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.31 | $23.64 to $30.12 | 20,830 |
| Registered nurses | $39.18 | $36.28 to $45.79 | 72,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 14.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.6 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 35.4 | 16.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.5 | 22.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.5 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Dyersburg Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Tennessee: 62 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 65 eligible stays.
12.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Tennessee: 1 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 85 eligible stays.
7.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Tennessee: 2 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.
34.6% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee58.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.
2.6% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee0.8% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 78 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 78 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee98.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE BAY AT DYERSBURG HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Champion Care, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Bay at Highlands Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2022 |
| Bl Capital Group Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10% | 06/01/2022 |
| Legacy SNF Opco Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 13% | 06/01/2022 |
| Legacy SNF Opco Holdings Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 13% | 06/01/2022 |
| Tn2 Opco Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 25% | 06/01/2022 |
| McGovern, Benjamin | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/23/2023 | |
| Ruvel, Menachem | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Weinberg, Yisroel | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Champion Care LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2022 | |
| Ruvel, Menachem | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Weinberg, Yisroel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Tennessee. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.