Home / North Dakota / Devils Lake
Eventide Heartland
620 14th Ave Ne, Devils Lake, ND 58301 · Ramsey County · (701) 662-4905
78 certified beds, about 72 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355069 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 20, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 23 health citations since April 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.28 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.
52.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
May 20, 2026Standard inspection · 8 citations
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to fully inform the resident or resident's representative regarding treatment with psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Failure to fully inform the resident or resident's representative of the risks, benefits, or alternative options for psychotropic medications does not allow residents the right to choose treatment options.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide privacy for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #15 and #27) observed during personal cares while positioned in a mechanical sit-to-stand lift. Failure to ensure privacy during personal care infringes on the resident's rights and does not enhance their quality of life.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 1 supplemental residents (Resident #60) on oxygen. Failure to clean personal fans does not provide a safe and clean environment and may place the resident at risk for illness.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.20.1), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #5 and #9). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to properly utilize assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #8, #15, and #27) observed during transfers with a mechanical sit-to-stand lift. Failure to properly utilize a mechanical sit-to-stand lift during transfers placed the residents at risk for injury and falls.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of the dialysis contract, review of the dialysis communications forms, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #7) receiving hemodialysis. Failure to complete dialysis treatment communications may result in an unidentified change in the resident's condition.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of professional reference and staff interviews, the facility failed to label over the counter (OTC) medications in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 2 medication carts. Failure to ensure appropriate and legible labels placed residents at risk for potential medication errors.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of professional references, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #15 and #30) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to hand hygiene, glove use, and when emptying catheter bags has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
April 9, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility reported incident (FRI) investigation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from physical abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who displayed physical and verbal aggression toward other residents. Failure to ensure an environment free from physical and verbal abuse placed all residents at risk for injury, fear, anxiety, and/or psychosocial harm. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Vulnerable Adult - North Dakota occurred on 04/08/26. This policy, dated February 2026, stated, . Vulnerable Adult - Every resident of the facility . Abuse - the willful infliction of injury . Physical abuse - conduct that produces pain or injury and is not accidental . Examples of abuse . resident to resident abuse . A FRI report, dated 02/14/26, stated, . [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3 and #6) observed during cares and 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #7) observed during a dressing change. Failure to practice infection control standards related to glove usage and hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene occurred on 04/09/26. This policy, dated February 2026, stated, . Hand hygiene will be done: A. Before and after resident contact (before you leave the room). B. Before every clean procedure. C. After every dirty procedure. The purpose is to prevent the spread of infection.-Observation on 04/08/26 at 1:00 p.m. [...]
April 30, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 5 of 7 residents (Resident #2, #19, #20, #21, and #58) observed during medication administration. Thirteen medication errors occurred during staff administration of 37 medications, resulting in a 35% error rate. Failure to properly prime insulin pens and administer medications at the correct time may result in residents receiving an ineffective and/or inaccurate dose and experience adverse reactions.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the current status for 2 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #29 and #58). Failure to revise the care plan limited the ability of staff to communicate care needs and ensure continuity of care for each resident.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wrote1. Based on observation, record review, policy review, professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #19) observed during medication administration. Failure to document medications at the time of administration does not reflect the actual time of administration and may cause adverse effects for the resident.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, review of operator's instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #9) observed during a sit-to-stand mechanical lift transfer. Failure to utilize a mechanical lift properly, complete a nursing assessment, and implement a safe transfer method placed Resident #9 at risk for pain and/or injury.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 3 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #19, #25 and #46) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to hand hygiene and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure posting of accurate and complete staffing information on 1 of 4 days of survey (April 27, 2025). Failure to post accurate staffing data does not allow residents and visitors to be aware of the number of licensed and unlicensed staff on duty each shift.
December 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative a written bed hold notice for 1 of 1 closed record (Resident #10) reviewed for hospital transfers. Failure to provide a written copy of the bed hold notice does not allow the resident and/or their representatives to make an informed decision regarding their care.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility reported incident and investigation documents, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision and/or assistance to prevent an accident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) who fell during a mechanical stand lift transfer. Failure to provide two-person assistance and failure to utilize the shin strap resulted in Resident #1's fall from the stand lift, injury, and placed all residents transferred via a stand lift at risk for falls and/or injury. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility incident report, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #9) reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations. Failure to have a complete and accurate medical record limited staff's access to the most recent medical information regarding the residents.
April 18, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteTHIS IS A REPEAT DEFICIENCY FROM THE SURVEY COMPLETED ON 02/15/23. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs regarding call lights for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #227) with a soft touch call light. Failure to place Resident #227's call light within reach may result in an inability to call for help, discomfort, increased falls, and/or incontinence.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #1). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the resident's current status for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #227). Failure to revise the care to reflect Resident #227's current status limited the staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care for residents.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteTHIS IS A REPEAT DEFICIENCY FROM THE SURVEY COMPLETED ON 04/20/23. 1. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #227) observed during stand lift transfers. Failure to ensure staff utilized the correct lift during transfers caused Resident #227 discomfort/pain and placed him at risk for possible injury.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.28 | 4.42 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.73 | 0.93 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.87 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.02 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.52 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.9% | 48.8% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.11 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.44 on weekdays and 3.87 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 31.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.27 in April to June 2025 to 4.28 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.28 | 0.73 | 4.44 | 3.87 | 31.4% | 0 of 90 | 72 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.25 | 0.81 | 4.41 | 3.85 | 33.1% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.37 | 0.77 | 4.52 | 3.99 | 29.3% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.27 | 0.74 | 4.46 | 3.82 | 24.1% | 0 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Dakota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.57 | 0.92 | 4.81 | 3.96 | 11.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.6 | 19.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 5.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.5 | 17.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.3 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.5 | 19.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.3 | 11.4 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: LAKE REGION LUTHERAN HOME, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eventide | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2014 |
| Brandt, Terry | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2026 | |
| Bye, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Gulbranson, Patrick | Corporate director | Individual | 08/03/2023 | |
| Johnson, Vikki | Corporate director | Individual | 08/03/2023 | |
| Lunak, Brandon | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2026 | |
| Seljevold, Peter | Corporate director | Individual | 08/03/2023 | |
| Johnson, Vikki | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Lunak, Brandon | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2026 | |
| Ohe, Darin | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/07/2019 | |
| Riewer, Jon | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/25/2014 | |
| Blue Stone Therapy Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Close, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/11/2022 | |
| Eckes, Linda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2020 | |
| Leigh Degenstein, Heather | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/25/2022 | |
| Ohe, Darin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/07/2019 | |
| Samson, Nicole | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2026 | |
| Sandvik, Destiney | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/31/2022 | |
| Schneider, Tanya | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/04/2024 | |
| Strong, Jeff | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/28/2018 | |
| Trottier, Nathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/30/2021 | |
| Wass, Jerilyn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| Blue Stone Therapy Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2025 | |
| Close, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/11/2022 | |
| Eckes, Linda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2020 | |
| Leigh Degenstein, Heather | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/25/2022 | |
| Ohe, Darin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/07/2019 | |
| Samson, Nicole | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2026 | |
| Sandvik, Destiney | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Schneider, Tanya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/04/2024 | |
| Strong, Jeff | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/28/2018 | |
| Trottier, Nathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/30/2021 | |
| Wass, Jerilyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 20, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 20, 2026: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 20, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 20, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Good Samaritan Society - Lakota Lakota, 23.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 30 citations
North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: North Dakota Health and Human Services, Health Facilities Unit, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: North Dakota Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, (855) 462-5465. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: North Dakota Deficiency Statement Search, where North Dakota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Eventide Heartland's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Eventide Heartland 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Eventide Heartland get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 20, 2026. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
- Has Eventide Heartland been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Eventide Heartland accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Eventide Heartland?
- CMS lists 33 owners and managers. Legal business name: LAKE REGION LUTHERAN HOME, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.