307 N Fifth St. Box 5477, Maryville, TN 37801 · Blount County · (865) 983-0261
75 certified beds, about 72 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 445286 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 1, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Tennessee average is 4.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 17 health citations since March 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.79 hours per resident per day, against 3.80 across Tennessee and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.51 of those hours.
53.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Tennessee average 48.9%).
CMS links it to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, an affiliated group of 79 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention related to falls for 1 resident (Resident #4) of 3 care plans reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide palatable temperature of meals for 2 residents (Resident #6 and Resident #26) of 5 residents reviewed for dietary services.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 2 of 2 hallways observed for a clean, comfortable, homelike environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) Report Fiscal Year (FY) for the second Quarter of 2026 (January 1-March 31) review, daily staffing assignment review, time detail report review, and interviews the facility failed to submit accurate weekend staffing information to the Payroll Based Journal, (PBJ) for 13 of 13 weekends reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an employee's personal food items were not stored in the kitchen reach-in cooler and failed to ensure frozen food items were stored properly, which had the potential to affect 70 of 71 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents' health information remained private and confidential on 1 medication cart (Back 100 cart) of 4 medication carts observed, which had the potential to allow unauthorized individuals access to the residents' private health information.
Inspectors wroteBased on Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual review, facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurate for 1 resident (Resident #68) of 20 residents reviewed for MDS assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a medication error for 1 resident (Resident #40) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene when serving residents' meal trays for 3 residents (Resident #55, #11, and #38), the facility failed to wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when delivering the meal tray for 1 resident (Resident #69), and the facility failed to offer hand hygiene assistance prior to meals for 1 resident (Resident #50) of 18 residents observed for meal tray distribution.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, homelike environment on 1 of 2 hallways, and 5 resident's (Resident #37, #418, #1, #39, and #15) rooms of 15 rooms observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment for 1 resident (Resident #36) of 20 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 3 residents (Resident #39, #36 and #33) related to the use of anticoagulants, hospice, and restraints of 20 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for 1 resident (Resident #3) of 20 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for 2 residents (Residents #61 and #418) of 3 residents reviewed for wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, safety data sheet review, medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure chemicals were secured in resident (Resident #37, #8, and #41's) bathroom.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident # 54) of 20 sampled residents received trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for a resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain mechanical equipment in a safe operating condition in 2 of 2 dryers observed in the laundry room.
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 1, 2026, 4 on March 20, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.79 | 3.80 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.51 | 0.60 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.32 | 3.31 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.52 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.75 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.8% | 48.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 43.8% | 43.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.95 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.98 on weekdays and 2.32 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.73 in April to June 2025 to 2.79 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.79 | 0.51 | 2.98 | 2.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 72 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.45 | 0.54 | 2.63 | 2.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.66 | 0.55 | 2.88 | 2.10 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 73 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.73 | 0.55 | 2.96 | 2.18 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Tennessee, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.56 | 3.95 | 3.27 | 4.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.09 to $19.66 | 27,040 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.31 | $23.64 to $30.12 | 20,830 |
| Registered nurses | $39.18 | $36.28 to $45.79 | 72,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.0 | 14.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 16.9 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Fairpark Health and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Tennessee: 62 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.
10.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Tennessee: 1 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Tennessee: 2 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Tennessee58.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Tennessee0.8% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Tennessee1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Tennessee98.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MARYVILLE FAIRPARK OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, a group of 79 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overholt, Amanda | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/30/2024 | |
| Vujanovic, Mick | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Clearview Healthcare Management Tn LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2020 | |
| Vujanovic, Mick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Overholt, Amanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/25/2024 | |
| Vujanovic, Mick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/25/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Tennessee. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.