Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Gainesville

Gainesville Nursing

77 Medical Drive, Gainesville, MO 65655 · Ozark County · (417) 679-4921

99 certified beds, about 47 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265312 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 12, 2024, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 25 health citations since October 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.63 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.62 of those hours.

48.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

CMS links it to Community Care Centers, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
18D
6E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 12, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all residents from misappropriation of resident property when staff could not account for 19 missing narcotics tablets for 10 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9 and Resident #10). The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy, revised 10/22, showed the following information:-Should a specific employee be suspected of or have allegations made of misappropriation, the facility will follow the investigation protocol set forth in this policy;-The facility will educate staff on the policy and procedure for prevention of misappropriation of resident property and of investigation reporting and staff responsibility. [...]
January 6, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect all resident from misappropriation of property when one facility staff member (Environmental Services Employee A) used one resident's (Resident #1) debit card without consent. The facility census was 46. On 12/26/25, the Social Services Worker became aware of the misappropriation. The facility immediately began their investigation, including multiple interviews of other residents and staff. The facility began education on abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident's property. The facility removed Environmental Services Employee A from the facility. The facility reviewed all other resident's accounts with a debit card, as well as educated the residents on the process for debit card transactions. [...]
November 14, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 12, 2024
    Inspectors wrote1. Please refer to Event ID B3N912, exit date 11/14/24. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegation of possible neglect were reported within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when the facility Administrator received an allegation of possible neglect involving one resident (Resident #1) in a facility and failed to report it to DHSS. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated October 2022, showed the following: -The facility Administrator will be designated as the facility Abuse Coordinator and will be responsible for overseeing the Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program and directing any abuse investigation. -Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator. [...]
  2. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 12, 2024
    Inspectors wrote1. Please refer to Event ID B3N912, exit date 11/14/24. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible neglect were investigated by the facility and the investigation submitted to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within five days when a staff member received an allegation of possible neglect of one resident (Resident #1) and the facility failed to complaint a full investigation. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated October 2022, showed the following: -The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents. This includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychological wellbeing. [...]
September 12, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food prepared by the facility was palatable when residents complained the food was served cold at times, the food lacked flavor/seasoning, and the meat was tough at times. 1. Observations and interview on 09/11/24, at 1:07 P.M., showed the following: -The Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed testing the food on the last (test) tray on the cart. Prior to leaving the kitchen the temperature of the cheesy rice casserole was 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F); pork chop was 125 degrees F; and the broccoli was 115 degrees F. -When the tray was presented after the last tray was delivered, the casserole was 110 degrees F, the pork chop was 95 degrees F, and the broccoli was 90 degrees F. -The DM said the food was cool and should have been warmer to be palatable for the residents. [...]
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegation of possible neglect were reported within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when the facility Administrator received an allegation of possible neglect involving one resident (Resident #1) in a facility and failed to report it to DHSS. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated October 2022, showed the following: -The facility Administrator will be designated as the facility Abuse Coordinator and will be responsible for overseeing the Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program and directing any abuse investigation. -Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the Administrator. [...]
  3. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible neglect were investigated by the facility and the investigation submitted to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within five days when a staff member received an allegation of possible neglect of one resident (Resident #1) and the facility failed to complaint a full investigation. The facility census was 43. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention, and Prohibition Policy, dated October 2022, showed the following: -The facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents. This includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychological wellbeing. [...]
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop complete a person centered care plan for each resident when staff failed to care plan related to side rails use for one resident (Resident #13) and wandering/elopement risks for one resident (Resident #36) of 21 sampled residents. Review of the facility's Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team policy, dated January 2017 showed the following: -Upon completion of comprehensive assessments care areas of concern will be triggered to be addressed in the plan of care for that resident. -Each triggered care area will be reviewed by designated staff to determine if a triggered condition affects the resident's function and quality of life. -Staff will document whether or not a care plan is needed to address the triggered area. 1. [...]
  5. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment as free from accident hazards as possible for all residents when staff failed to evaluate effective of interventions, care plan new interventions, and failed to complete root cause analysis after multiple elopement attempts and combativeness for one of two residents (Resident #22) reviewed for wandering. Review of the facility's policy titled Elopement Policy, undated, showed it was the intent of the facility to maintain and enhance a resident's dignity by promoting free access in and around the facility, while safeguarding the well-being of the resident, and to monitor behavior or residents to identify potential elopers, such as excessive wandering, especially to doors. 1. [...]
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    F805 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food was prepared in a form designed to meet the needs of each resident when the facility failed to cut up meat as ordered for one resident (Resident #17). Review of the facility policy titled Menus and Food Preparation-Nutrition Services, revised January 2018, showed the purpose of the policy was to ensure resident nutritional needs are met in conjunction with resident preferences. 1. Review of Resident #17'sadmission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, showed the following: -admission date of 10/18/21; -readmission date of 08/09/22; -Diagnoses included gastroesophageal reflux disease. [...]
November 17, 2022Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a risk/benefit review and document alternatives attempted prior to bed rail use for five residents (Residents #8, #12, #27, #31, and #199); failed to obtain informed consent prior to the use side rails for one resident (Resident #31); failed to address the use bed rails in residents' care plans for four residents (Residents #8, #12, #31, and #199); and failed to obtain physician's orders for bed rail use for two residents (Resident #12 ad #199); and failed to ensure staff conducted periodic safety rechecks of all bed rails in use. The facility census was 48. Record review of a facility policy entitled Proper Use of Side Rails, reviewed 2/2021, showed the following: -Side rails are only permissible if they are used to treat a resident's medical symptoms or to assist with mobility and transfer of residents; [...]
  2. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to the hospital, including the reason for the transfer, for one resident (Resident #37) and failed to notify the ombudsman of transfers to the hospital for two residents (Residents #6 and #37). The facility census was 48. Record review showed the facility did not provide a a written policy pertaining to transferring a resident to the hospital. Record review of a facility form entitled Notice of Resident Transfer or Discharge, revised 11/2016, showed the following spaces to fill: -Date of notice; -Name, address, city, state, and zip (did not specify for whom); -Salutation to addressee; -Name of resident; -Name and location of institution where resident to be transferred/discharged ; -Date of transfer; -Rationale for transfer; [...]
  3. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to give written information to the resident and/or resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy for two residents (Residents #6 and #37) who were transferred out to the hospital. The facility census was 48. Record review of the facility's policy entitled Bed Hold Policy & Agreement Form, revised February 2014, showed the following: -Purpose to establish policy and procedure for facility to notify the resident/responsible party of the Bed Hold Policy and Agreement To Pay Charges For Bed Hold. The facility is to execute an acknowledgement stating whether or not such resident desires to exercise his or her right to a bed hold. The policy should meet applicable regulatory, federal and state program guidelines; -The Bed Hold Agreement is to be obtained for each occurrence - hospital or therapeutic home leave; [...]
  4. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify and coordinate with the State-designated authority following newly evident or possible serious mental illness for one resident (Resident #6) who had a negative level one Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disability are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care. The PASARR requires that all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for a serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability and be offered the most appropriate integrated setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting) and receive the services they need in those settings). The facility census was 48. [...]
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure proper care for all residents with catheters (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) when staff failed to obtain updated physician orders for an indwelling catheter for one resident (Resident #12). The facility census was 48. 1. Record review of Resident #12's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 9/26/22, showed the following information: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included history of neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve condition); -Cognitively intact; -Total dependence on staff assistance for transfers, dressing, toileting, and bathing; -Limited assistance required with bed mobility and personal hygiene; -Always continent of bowel and bladder; [...]
  6. D
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    F728 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one nursing assistant (NA B) completed a state approved certified nursing assistant (CNA) training program and competency evaluation program within four months of hire. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received care from the NA. The facility's census was 48. Record review showed the facility did not provide a written policy pertaining to Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) training and certification testing. 1. Record review of NA B's personnel file showed the following: -Date of hire: 6/28/2022; -Staff did not have documentation NA B had completed the nurse aide training program and passed the required certification testing. Record review of the Missouri CNA Registry on-line verification showed the NA did not have an active CNA certification. [...]
October 24, 2019Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 7, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect food from possible contamination when staff failed to follow proper hand hygiene when handling food items and food contact surfaces; when staff failed to properly wear facial hair nets and hair nets; when staff failed to ensure that the warewasher was working properly; and when staff failed to keep open drinks out of the kitchen. The facility had a census of 49 residents. 1. Record review of the 2013 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code showed the following information: -Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles; [...]
  2. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 7, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included interventions to address facility identified resident care needs for three residents (Resident #2, #25, and #146) in a sample of 18 residents in a facility with a census of 49. 1. Record review of Resident #25's nurses' notes, dated 8/13/19, showed the resident admitted to the facility. The resident reported blindness in the right eye and vision clear in the left eye. The resident did not wear glasses. Record review of the resident's physician progress notes, dated 8/14/19, showed the resident had head trauma injury several years prior and became combative and verbally abusive. Since that time, his/her organic brain trauma has been complicated by dementia. [...]
  3. E
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 7, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a form to meet each resident's nutritional needs when staff did not follow portion sizes for mechanical soft diets or prepare and serve pureed foods according to the approved recipe and the correct consistency for three residents (Resident #9, #11, and #16). The facility census was 49. Record review of facility records showed the facility did not provide a policy for therapeutic diets. 1. Record review of the facility's weekly menu, dated October 20, 2019 through October 26, 2019, showed the following information: -Wednesday, October 23, 2019: Salisbury steak, au gratin potatoes, and mixed vegetables; -Thursday, October 24, 2019: Roast turkey with gravy, sweet potatoes, and whole green beans. Record review of the facility's menu cycle, entitled Week 1 Wednesday, showed the following information: [...]
  4. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 7, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve residents, including six sampled residents (Resident #4, #15, #17, #26, #33, and #196) palatable and attractive food to resident. The facility census was 49. 1. Record review of the facility's resident council minutes dated 6/18/19, at 10:30 A.M., showed the meat was too tough to cut. Record review of the facility's resident council Quality of Life questionnaire, dated 6/18/19, showed the following information: -Is the flavor and appearance of your food satisfactory? Sometimes; -Are the meats tender enough? No. Record review of the facility's grievance log dated 6/18/19, showed Resident #33 filed a grievance and said the meat was still tough. Record review of the facility's resident council minutes dated 7/16/19, at 10:15 A.M., showed the the food did not taste good. [...]
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 7, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated each resident with respect and dignity when staff failed to interact with one resident (Resident #196) in a respectful manner while assisting the resident to eat. The facility census was 49. 1. Record review of Resident #196's 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/30/19, showed the following information: -Original admission date of 5/1/19; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, diabetes, anxiety disorder, seizure disorder, and psychosis; -Severely cognitively impaired; -Required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, personal hygiene, and eating. Observation on 10/22/19, beginning at 12:55 P.M., showed the following: [...]
  6. D
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    F678 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 7, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' end of life wishes reflected throughout the medical record remained consistent for two residents (Resident #4 and #246) out of a sample of 18 residents. The facility census was 49. Record review of the American Heart Association website, showed the following information regarding Advance Directives: -Advance directives, also referred to as living wills, can address a number of issues, such as whether a patient wants to receive artificial respiration, dialysis, tube feeding or artificial hydration, or donate an organ in the event of death. [...]
  7. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 7, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check one resident's (Resident #1) blood glucose level (blood test to determine glucose level) before meals as ordered by the physician and according to the standard of practice. Facility staff failed to administer two residents' (Resident #1 and #146) insulin injections timely and as ordered by the physician. Staff failed to ensure the resident's physician orders included the sliding scale for insulin administration ordered by the physician. A sample of 18 residents was reviewed in a facility with a census of 49. Record review of a facility policy and procedure entitled, Insulin Administration (Revised April 2007), showed the following information: -The three key characteristics of insulin are onset of action (how quickly the insulin reaches the bloodstream and begins to lower blood glucose); [...]
  8. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 7, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to care plan and implement effective interventions to prevent one residents (Resident #25) from exiting the facility and/or wandering into another resident's room. The facility census was 49. 1. Record review of Resident #25's face sheet (brief resident information sheet), showed the following information: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Record review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS) showed order, dated 8/13/19, for Perphenazine, 4 milligram (antipsychotic medication) three times a day. Record review of the resident's nurses' notes, dated 8/13/19, showed the resident as alert and oriented to self, forgetful. The resident had poor short term memory. Staff to monitor safety awareness. [...]
  9. D
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    F744 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 7, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed attempt effective interventions, including non-pharmacological interventions and failed to develop an individualized, person-centered care plan to meet the needs of one resident (Resident #32) with dementia and exhibiting continued behaviors. The facility census was 49. Record review of the facility's (undated) behavior policy showed the following information: -Goal was to encourage individual resident independence and autonomy by structuring a least restrictive environment which allows each resident to be restraint free for optimal periods of time and enhances the goal of quality therapeutic, preventative, restorative, and rehabilitative care; [...]

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 4 on September 12, 2024, 2 on November 17, 2022.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · September 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · September 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Ensure that waiting areas, nurse’s stations, gift shops, and cooking facilities, open to the corridor are properly protected.
    K 361 · September 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · September 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · November 17, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · November 17, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)2.633.433.86
Registered nurses0.620.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.323.013.42
Nurse aides1.83
Licensed practical nurses0.19
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)48.6%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover50.0%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 3.22 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.76 on weekdays and 2.32 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.78 in April to June 2025 to 2.63 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20262.630.622.762.32 0.0%0 of 9047
Oct to Dec 20252.640.572.752.37 0.0%0 of 9246
Jul to Sep 20252.730.632.842.45 0.0%0 of 9244
Apr to Jun 20252.780.662.912.46 0.1%0 of 9142
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.818.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.41.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.52.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.44.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.417.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.84.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.723.515.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.92.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.22.31.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BEL OAK OF GAINESVILLE LLC. CMS links this home to Community Care Centers, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 2.6 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Weiner, Craig5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%06/01/2023
Weiner, Gina5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%06/01/2023
Gc Asset Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/01/2023
Beasley, SherriOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/24/2026
Henegar, EdwardOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/24/2026
Gc Asset Management LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/06/2025
Beasley, SherriAdp of the SNFIndividual03/24/2026
Henegar, EdwardAdp of the SNFIndividual12/11/2024
Weiner, CraigAdp of the SNFIndividual01/06/2025
Weiner, GinaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/06/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on September 12, 2024: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 12, 2026: "Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on September 12, 2024: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 12, 2024: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.32 hours per resident per day, below the Missouri average of 3.01.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Gainesville Nursing's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Gainesville Nursing 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Gainesville Nursing get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 12, 2024. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Gainesville Nursing been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Gainesville Nursing accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Gainesville Nursing?
CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to Community Care Centers. Legal business name: BEL OAK OF GAINESVILLE LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection