Find a nursing home

Home / Kansas / Garden City

Garden Valley Retirement Village

1505 E Spruce Street, Garden City, KS 67846 · Finney County · (620) 275-9651

62 certified beds, about 51 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175175 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 12, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 19 health citations since August 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.45 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.

53.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).

CMS links it to Frontline Management, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
17D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 12, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 45, which included four residents that had physician orders for pureed diets. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food prepared in accordance with recipes to ensure conservation of nutritive value, flavor, palatability, and appearance for four residents that received pureed diets. This placed the affected residents at risk for impaired nutrition and diminished enjoyment of their meals.
  2. D
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    F627 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the discharge needs were identified, and an appropriate discharge plan was created for Resident (R) 39. This placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and inappropriate discharge.
  3. D
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 45 residents with 12 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 43 received services to maintain his abilities of activities of daily living (ADL). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for a decrease in functional abilities and decreased independence.
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one dependent resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL care including grooming of facial hair for Resident (R) 45. This placed the resident at risk for impaired dignity and poor hygiene.
  5. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 45 residents, with 12 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards when the facility failed to identify and change ineffective fall interventions and failed to fully implement all interventions aimed at preventing falls for Resident (R) 38, who had multiple falls. This deficient practice placed R38 at risk for further falls and related injuries.
  6. D
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    F694 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 45 residents, with 12 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services for Resident (R) 41's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large vein above the heart) when staff failed to perform the PICC dressing change every five days and failed to label the antibiotic medication that was administered. These deficient practices placed R41 at risk for complications related to the PICC line and medication administration via the PICC.
  7. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement provider orders based on the Consultant Pharmacist's (CP) monthly medication review (MRR) and ensure an MRR review system that mitigated duplication or omissions for Resident (R) 38. The deficient practice placed the resident at risk of receiving unnecessary medications.
June 29, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 53 residents with 13 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one Resident (R)41, with failure to identify poor dentition (of, or related to teeth) as evidenced by worn and broken teeth. This placed the resident at risk for uncommunicated care needs.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 53 residents with 13 residents reviewed. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for Resident (R)41 for the provision of needed dental services and R7 for care and maintenance of an indwelling urinary catheter (a hollow flexible tube that collects urine and leads to a drainage bag). This placed the residents at risk to not receive appropriate cares and treatments.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 53 residents with 13 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 8's care plan related to physician ordered stockings used for edema.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 53 residents, with 13 sampled, including five residents for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of black box warnings (BBW- serious or life-threatening side effects of medications) for two of the five residents reviewed. Resident (R) 13 and R29. These failures placed the residents at risk for adverse effects related to monitoring of BBW medication use. Findings Included: [...]
  5. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 53 residents, with 13 sampled, including five residents for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of black box warnings (BBW- serious or life-threatening side effects of medications) for psychotropic (affects how the brain works and causes changes in awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behaviors) medications for three of the five residents reviewed. Resident (R) 13, R17, and R28. These failures placed the residents at risk for adverse effects related to monitoring of BBW psychotropic medication use. Findings Included: [...]
  6. D
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 53 residents, with 13 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for dental services. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services or access to dental services for Resident (R) 41, due to widespread dental decay. This placed the resident at risk for further deterioration of dentition (of or having to do with teeth).
August 19, 2021Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 24, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 50 with 16 sampled residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices by the failure to have resident information scanned into the Electronic Health Record (EHR) in a timely manner.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 24, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 50 with 16 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 42 with the right to a dignified existence when staff failed to serve her in a timely manner once she was seated for the noon meal on 08/16/21. R42 waited nearly an hour for her meal at the table, while other residents around her ate and staff served another resident who arrived to the table after R42.
  3. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 24, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 50 residents with 16 included in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 28, R42, and R150 or their representative with a bed-hold policy upon transfer to a hospital.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 24, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 50 residents, with 16 sampled, including one for accuracy of assessments in the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately document resident (R) 35's dental status by the failure to document the broken dentures of R35.
  5. D
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 24, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 50 residents, with 16 residents sampled, including one for review of dental services. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 35 with the assistance needed to repair her broken dentures after staff identified it as a concern over two months prior, 06/17/21-08/19/21.
  6. D
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    F810 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 24, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 50 with 16 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 46 with adaptive eating utensils and/or plate to improve the residents' ability to eat independently.

Fire safety inspections

16 fire safety citations on file: 6 on June 12, 2025, 6 on June 29, 2023, 4 on August 19, 2021.

Every fire safety citation16 citations
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.
    K 131 · June 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · June 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · June 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · June 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. F
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · June 29, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · August 19, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. F
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · August 19, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · August 19, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · August 19, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeKansasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.454.073.86
Registered nurses0.780.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.133.603.42
Nurse aides2.38
Licensed practical nurses0.29
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)53.8%48.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover64.3%42.0%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.46 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.58 on weekdays and 3.13 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.52 in April to June 2025 to 3.45 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.450.783.583.13 7.6%0 of 9051
Oct to Dec 20253.430.893.493.27 5.1%0 of 9251
Jul to Sep 20253.350.863.423.16 3.2%0 of 9249
Apr to Jun 20253.520.823.623.26 5.2%0 of 9148
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Kansas, Jan to Mar 20264.010.674.193.564.8%0.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Kansas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Kansas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.27$17.41 to $21.2424,610
LPNs and LVNs$29.69$27.05 to $33.407,530
Registered nurses$38.14$35.24 to $45.5333,800
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeKansasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
26.717.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.42.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.84.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
44.416.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.04.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.118.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
18.622.423.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.011.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.51.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.62.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Garden Valley Retirement Village's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

54.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 134 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 85 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

43.1% this home

Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

2.1% this home

Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 95 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.3% this home

Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 95 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

94.6% this home

Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: GARDEN VALLEY RETIREMENT VILLAGE, LLC. CMS links this home to Frontline Management, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Falk, Gregory5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%07/19/2009
Veluscek, Paul5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual5%07/19/2009
Veluscek, Steven5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual45%07/19/2009
Holland, VickiDirect ownership interestIndividual11/25/2020
Ong, EdisonCorporate officerIndividual04/04/2025
Frontier Management IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization07/19/2009
Allen, MorghanOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2025
Altman, TamaraOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2025
Baker, AdamOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/16/2020
Booker, ScottOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2022
Calzada, CarmenOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/18/2022
Holland, VickiOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/25/2020
Johnston, JenniferOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/19/2023
Jones, RobertOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/10/2012
Kersenbrock, RenaeOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/02/2025
Lozano, KarenOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/04/2024
Newton, MichelleOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/02/2014
Ong, EdisonOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/04/2025
Orback, HeatherOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/20/2011
Perez, RobertoOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/24/2022
Pittillo, KristainOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2020
Salas, CheriseOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/02/2014
Scott, AngelaOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2020
Stevenson, JillOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/28/2025
Irwin, JanetIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual06/04/2025
Kiklis, DeanIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual07/30/2025
Saracino, KellyIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual07/30/2025
Bokf,naAdp of the SNFOrganization06/13/2019
Finanical Management IncAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2010
Frontier Management IncAdp of the SNFOrganization11/04/2025
Frontline Mds Exchange LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/01/2025
Integra Accounting Solutions LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2025
Key Rehabilitation IncAdp of the SNFOrganization02/01/2024
Openwork Health LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/31/2022
Pinnacle Pharmacy Group IncAdp of the SNFOrganization03/01/2025
Allen, MorghanAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2025
Altman, TamaraAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2025
Baker, AdamAdp of the SNFIndividual04/16/2020
Booker, ScottAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2022
Calzada, CarmenAdp of the SNFIndividual03/18/2022
Johnston, JenniferAdp of the SNFIndividual12/19/2023
Jones, RobertAdp of the SNFIndividual05/10/2012
Kersenbrock, RenaeAdp of the SNFIndividual09/02/2025
Lekawa, ElliotAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2019
Lozano, KarenAdp of the SNFIndividual03/04/2024
Newton, MichelleAdp of the SNFIndividual06/02/2014
Ong, EdisonAdp of the SNFIndividual04/04/2025
Orback, HeatherAdp of the SNFIndividual09/20/2011
Perez, RobertoAdp of the SNFIndividual09/24/2022
Pittillo, KristainAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2020
Salas, CheriseAdp of the SNFIndividual06/02/2014
Scott, AngelaAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2020
Stevenson, JillAdp of the SNFIndividual05/28/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 29, 2023: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.13 hours per resident per day, below the Kansas average of 3.60.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Common questions

What is Garden Valley Retirement Village's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Garden Valley Retirement Village 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Garden Valley Retirement Village get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 12, 2025. The Kansas average is 9.5.
Has Garden Valley Retirement Village been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Garden Valley Retirement Village accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Garden Valley Retirement Village?
CMS lists 53 owners and managers, and links the home to Frontline Management. Legal business name: GARDEN VALLEY RETIREMENT VILLAGE, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection