Find a nursing home

Home / South Dakota / Canistota

Good Samaritan Society Canistota

700 West Main St., Canistota, SD 57012 · Mc Cook County · (605) 296-3442

55 certified beds, about 53 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 435087 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 24, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the South Dakota average is 6.7, the national average 9.2).

Of 17 health citations since August 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $49,289 in the last three years; the largest was $40,280, and the latest is dated March 24, 2026.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.23 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across South Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.

68.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Dakota average 48.2%).

CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 24, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (7) with risk for developing skin wounds caused by prolonged pressure and expressed discomfort in areas of irritated skin around her suprapubic catheter (a flexible tubing surgically placed through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine) insertion site and in her abdominal fold was assessed for irritation and her physician was notified of those skin conditions to determine and order treatment to promote healing and prevent those areas from worsening or developing into pressure wounds.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the provider failed to ensure the code status (emergent treatment a person wishes to receive if their heart or breathing would stop) for thirteen of sixteen sampled residents (1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 23, 26, 40,42, 44, 46, 51, and 58) wishes were determined and accurately documented in the residents' electronic medical records (EMR) at the time of their admission to the facility and one of one sampled resident (46) with discrepancies in his documented code status.
  3. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff followed standard food safety and sanitation practices in the kitchen and food storage areas where residents' food was stored, prepared, and served.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff followed infection prevention practices regarding the disinfection of one of one whirlpool by one of one observed certified nursing assistant (CNA) (I), and the prompt cleaning of two of two sampled residents' (6 and 44) bedroom floors observed with bowel movement (BM) on them.
  5. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure two of two sampled residents'(42 and 46) Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used to evaluate a resident's health status and to develop an individualized care plan to manage the resident's care needs) assessments were accurately coded regarding Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR), used to screen residents for serious mental health, intellectual disabilities, or developmental disabilities to ensure appropriate placement and specialized services, and Level I PASRRs.
  6. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (1 and 46) with diagnosed anxiety, behaviors, psychosis, and mood disturbances had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) reviewed for accuracy to ensure the resident were evaluated for mental health care needs.
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure the safe use of devices by two of two certified nursing assistants (CNA) (H and K) observed transferring a resident to and from her wheelchair and her mattress without a gait belt (a waist strap gripped as support for safe mobility and transfers) for one of one sampled resident (11) with Huntington's disease (a progressive genetic disorder that causes the breakdown of nerve cells in the brain and involuntary movements) who needed to be transferred with the assistance of two staff members and the use of a gait belt. That failure put the resident at risk for falling and injury. 1. Observation and Interview on 3/17/26 at 3:33 p.m. [...]
December 4, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review the provider failed to provide bed-hod notices to residents and/or their representatives regarding transfers to the hospital on two of three occasions for two of two sampled residents (9 and 46).
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure: *Necessary food safety guidelines were followed for appropriate storage of resident food items. *Proper cleaning procedures were followed for dishes used to store, prepare, and serve residents' food in one of one main kitchen.
  3. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (42) had reviewed and was provided a summary of her baseline care plan within forty eight hours of admission.
August 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. G
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to accommodate one of one sampled resident's (2) snack time preferences.
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the care plan was revised to reflect the current snack preferences for one of one sampled resident (2).
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, interview, Roam Alert (door alarm) log review, and video review, the provider failed to ensure the safety of one of one sampled resident (1) identified at risk for elopement, who had eloped (left the facility without staff knowledge) after staff turned a door alarm off. Failure of staff to ensure the door alarm was rearmed resulted in the resident's elopement and put him at risk for physical injury or serious harm. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the provider implemented immediately following the incident.
August 10, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure one of one resident (23) who had a mental illness had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II completed timely. Review of resident 23's medical record revealed her: *admission date was 9/15/20. *Diagnosis included bipolar and an 8/25/21 schizoaffective disorder. *7/25/23 Brief Interview of Mental Status was a 15, that score meant she was cognitively intact. *Her care plan included: -She preferred to remain in her room. -She had disruptive behaviors including screaming and cursing at other people. -She had a private room due to the above. -Mental health services were provided to her by a behavioral health agency. Review of resident 23's admission PASARR revealed it: *Was completed on 8/24/20. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure: *Treatment and documentation had been completed for one of one sampled resident (37) according to the provider's polcy who had skin tears. *Two scheduled nebulized medications ordered by the physician for one of one sampled resident (37) were not obtained from the pharmacy according to the provider's policy.
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and policy review the provider failed to: *Ensure resident medications were secured for one of two medication carts four out of five times during the observed medication pass in the dining room. *Ensure expired influenza vaccines in one of one medication refridgerator were removed and disposed of and and were not available for resident use. 1. Observation and interview on 8/9/23 8:25 a.m. of registered nurse (RN) D during the medication pass in the resident dining room revealed: *Her medication cart was located in the doorway into the dining room. *She had walked away from the medication cart and into the dining room to give medications to three residents without locking the medication cart. *There were residents and staff walking past the medication cart that was unlocked while the RN was away from the medication cart. [...]
  4. D
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (11) received recommended routine dental services to prevent tooth extractions. Interview on 8/7/23 at 5:10 p.m. with resident 11 revealed she: *Was missing a few teeth and her teeth were discolored. *Stated that her tooth hurt and she had an appointment to have it pulled. *Had received Tylenol for the pain. Interview on 8/10/23 at 8:28 a.m. with resident 11 regarding her dental issues revealed she: *Had cream of wheat for breakfast. *Had difficulty chewing solid foods. *Had an upcoming dental appointment to have two teeth pulled on the left side. *Had no help from staff in brushing her teeth and felt she needed more assistance. *Needed to brush her teeth daily. *Had numerous toothbrushes that were kept in her bathroom cupboard, in a yellow plastic basin. Observation on 8/10/23 8: [...]

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 4 on March 24, 2026, 2 on December 4, 2024, 4 on August 10, 2023.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. D
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · March 24, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · March 24, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. C
    Have correct number of accessible exits for each story.
    K 241 · March 24, 2026 · no revisit needed
  4. C
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · March 24, 2026 · no revisit needed
  5. C
    Have correct number of accessible exits for each story.
    K 241 · December 4, 2024 · Not yet corrected
  6. C
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · December 4, 2024 · Not yet corrected
  7. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · August 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · August 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. C
    Have correct number of accessible exits for each story.
    K 241 · August 10, 2023 · fire safety evaluation s
  10. C
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · August 10, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
March 24, 2026Fine $40,280
August 20, 2024Fine $9,009

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeSouth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.233.793.86
Registered nurses0.460.800.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.883.263.42
Nurse aides2.49
Licensed practical nurses0.27
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)68.0%48.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover66.7%34.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 2.96 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.37 on weekdays and 2.88 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.01 in April to June 2025 to 3.23 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.230.463.372.88 2.9%0 of 9053
Oct to Dec 20253.020.613.152.70 0.6%0 of 9252
Jul to Sep 20253.020.543.182.62 2.5%0 of 9251
Apr to Jun 20253.010.563.162.65 4.8%0 of 9152
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
South Dakota, Jan to Mar 20263.760.793.973.259.1%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for South Dakota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
South Dakota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.65$17.71 to $21.126,860
LPNs and LVNs$25.36$23.88 to $29.472,050
Registered nurses$37.53$31.29 to $40.5214,710
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Good Samaritan Society Canistota. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeSouth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.121.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.52.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.05.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.12.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.119.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.54.64.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
44.324.615.4

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Good Samaritan Society Canistota's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · South Dakota: 7 better, 10 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 11 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 10.7% · South Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · South Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

47.6% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota52.7% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota1.1% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

7.9% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota2.5% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: South Dakota100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sanford5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gassen, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Molbert, LaurisCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
North, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Schieffer, KevinCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Fluit, JoelCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual05/30/2024
Middleton, AimeeCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2022
Olson, NicholasCorporate officerIndividual04/08/2024
Schema, NathanCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Geis, TaraOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2015
Morrison, TonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Sandgren, DeeandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/16/2023
Schroeder, AmyOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/29/2021
Dtn Staffing IncAdp of the SNFOrganization08/02/2024
Focusone SolutionsAdp of the SNFOrganization03/04/2024
Grape Tree Medical Staffing LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/13/2018
SanfordAdp of the SNFOrganization11/20/2025
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Fluit, JoelAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Geis, TaraAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2015
Gulsvig, NeilAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Middleton, AimeeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/27/2022
Molbert, LaurisAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Morrison, TonyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2019
North, AndrewAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Olson, NicholasAdp of the SNFIndividual04/08/2024
Sandgren, DeeandraAdp of the SNFIndividual07/16/2023
Schema, NathanAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022
Schieffer, KevinAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Schroeder, AmyAdp of the SNFIndividual03/29/2021
Shulkin, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.88 hours per resident per day, below the South Dakota average of 3.26.

Other nursing homes nearby

South Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in South Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Good Samaritan Society Canistota's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Good Samaritan Society Canistota 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Good Samaritan Society Canistota get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 24, 2026. The South Dakota average is 6.7.
Has Good Samaritan Society Canistota been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $49,289 in the last three years.
Does Good Samaritan Society Canistota accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Good Samaritan Society Canistota?
CMS lists 54 owners and managers, and links the home to Good Samaritan Society. Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection