Find a nursing home

Home / South Dakota / Marion

Tieszen Memorial Home

312 East State St., Marion, SD 57043 · Turner County · (605) 648-3611

64 certified beds, about 58 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 435069 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 28, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the South Dakota average is 6.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 12 health citations since August 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.47 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across South Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.76 of those hours.

50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Dakota average 48.2%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 28, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, observation, document review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that food was kept and served at a safe temperature for one of one Memory Care Unit dining room, and that food was palatable, appetizing, and warm in one of one main dining room.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure food items did not spoil in one of one walk-in refrigerators in the main kitchen, and one of one refrigerator on the Memory Care Unit was clean.
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure standard infection control prevention practices were followed by one of two observed certified nursing assistants (H) who used soiled gloves to obtain Aquaphor (a skin ointment) from a jar, and did not wear gloves for high-contact care provided to one of one sampled resident (5) who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, glove and gown use when providing contact care), and by two of two observed housekeepers (J and K) who did not change their gloves before going from a dirty to a clean task while cleaning three of three observed residents rooms (39, 57, 58, and 66).
  4. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that one of one sampled resident (66), who was left unsupervised to take her medication by a licensed practical nurse (LPN) (U), was assessed for the ability to safely self-administer medications.
  5. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure the Office of State Long-Term Ombudsman (an advocate of residents' overall quality of care and rights) was notified when a resident discharged from the facility, for one of two sampled residents (6).
  6. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to complete a side rail assessment for one of seven sampled residents (1).
  7. D
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure the daily posted nurse staffing information included the resident census.
December 19, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to effectively implement and follow their policy related to grievances for three of three sampled residents (18, 19, and 24) with unresolved reported concerns. They failed to ensure: *Residents were informed and information was available on how to file a grievance. *All grievances were documented and included the date received, summary statement of resident's grievance, steps taken to investigate and keep resident informed of progress, summary of pertinent findings or conclusion, any necessary corrective action, and date the grievance was resolved. *Documentation of grievances and their resolution was maintained. *Resident council notification of group-reported grievance progress and resolution.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteA. Based on observation, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure proper infection control practices for the cleaning of shared safety slings for two of two sampled residents (4 and 19) who required the use of a sit-to-stand lift (mechanical lift used to assist to a standing position for transfers).
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to: *Adequately assess, reassess, and monitor for resident changes in cognition and safety awareness for self and others for one of eight sampled resident (19) who used a power wheelchair for mobility. *Obtain a physician's order for use with cognitive ability acknowledged for that resident.
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator filter was clean and the nasal cannula tubing was changed weekly, for one of three sampled residents (4) who received oxygen from four oxygen concentrators that were separately located throughout the facility.
August 23, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure two of two resident-to-resident altercations had been reported to the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) in the designated time frame for one of one sampled resident (6).

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 28, 2026, 1 on December 19, 2024, 1 on August 23, 2023.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. C
    Have correct number of accessible exits for each story.
    K 241 · May 28, 2026 · no revisit needed
  2. C
    Have correct number of accessible exits for each story.
    K 241 · December 19, 2024 · Not yet corrected
  3. C
    Have correct number of accessible exits for each story.
    K 241 · August 23, 2023 · Not yet corrected

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeSouth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.473.793.86
Registered nurses0.760.800.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.013.263.42
Nurse aides2.39
Licensed practical nurses0.32
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)50.0%48.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover33.3%34.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 2.91 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.66 on weekdays and 3.01 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 10.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.58 in April to June 2025 to 3.47 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.470.763.663.01 10.2%0 of 9058
Oct to Dec 20253.360.713.512.96 8.9%0 of 9259
Jul to Sep 20253.470.773.653.02 12.8%0 of 9258
Apr to Jun 20253.580.723.753.16 16.0%0 of 9155
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
South Dakota, Jan to Mar 20263.760.793.973.259.1%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for South Dakota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
South Dakota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.65$17.71 to $21.126,860
LPNs and LVNs$25.36$23.88 to $29.472,050
Registered nurses$37.53$31.29 to $40.5214,710
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Tieszen Memorial Home. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeSouth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.421.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.92.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.42.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.05.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.72.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.719.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.34.64.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.924.615.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.11.81.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Tieszen Memorial Home's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · South Dakota: 7 better, 10 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · South Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · South Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

57.1% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota52.7% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

4.0% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota1.1% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

18.5% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota2.5% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: South Dakota100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: TIESZEN MEMORIAL HOME INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Berens, RavilaCorporate directorIndividual10/27/2009
Gall, DeannaCorporate directorIndividual02/01/2021
Johnson, PaulCorporate directorIndividual11/01/2009
Jones, JamesCorporate directorIndividual10/27/2009
Luke, RichardCorporate directorIndividual10/27/2009
Patten, ErinCorporate directorIndividual06/18/2025
Tieszen, EricCorporate directorIndividual02/17/2020
Berens, RavilaCorporate officerIndividual01/20/2020
Johnson, PaulCorporate officerIndividual01/20/2020
Luke, RichardCorporate officerIndividual01/20/2020
Avel Ecare Medical Group, PCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/15/2021
Rees, JosephOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/15/2021
Wilson, LauraOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/27/2009
Avel Ecare Medical Group, PCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/2026
Rees, JosephAdp of the SNFIndividual11/15/2021
Wilson, LauraAdp of the SNFIndividual05/29/2020

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 28, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 28, 2026: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 28, 2026: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 28, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.01 hours per resident per day, below the South Dakota average of 3.26.

Other nursing homes nearby

South Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in South Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Tieszen Memorial Home's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Tieszen Memorial Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Tieszen Memorial Home get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 28, 2026. The South Dakota average is 6.7.
Has Tieszen Memorial Home been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Tieszen Memorial Home accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Tieszen Memorial Home?
CMS lists 16 owners and managers. Legal business name: TIESZEN MEMORIAL HOME INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection