Find a nursing home

Home / South Dakota / Sioux Falls

Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor

1500 W 38th St., Sioux Falls, SD 57105 · Minnehaha County · (605) 336-1997

92 certified beds, about 86 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 435044 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 5, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the South Dakota average is 6.7, the national average 9.2).

Of 22 health citations since September 2023, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 4 fines totaling $111,701 in the last three years; the largest was $70,980, and the latest is dated June 4, 2026.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.94 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across South Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.95 of those hours.

43.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Dakota average 48.2%).

CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
6G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 4, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the safety of one of one sampled resident (1) who eloped (left the facility without staff knowledge) through the front door after visitors entered the facility and walked a block and a half east of the facility, fell with his walker, and sustained injuries. Findings Include: 1. Review of the provider's [DATE] SD DOH FRI report revealed that on [DATE] at 10:45 a.m., police alerted the staff that resident 1 was in an ambulance due to falling outside of the facility. A neighbor called 911 after seeing the resident lying on the sidewalk 1.5 blocks away from the facility. [...]
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint intake report, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff were educated on NPWT (closed drain system that relies on the presence of vacuum to withdraw accumulated fluid from around the wound bed into the collection device) treatments for one of one sampled resident (2) whose wound vac was placed incorrectly, which resulted in the resident developing red, irritate skin above his pressure ulcer on his buttocks.
April 1, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI) review, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that one of one sampled resident (1) was free from a significant medication error when his baclofen (a primary medication for managing involuntary muscle stiffness and muscle spasms in quadriplegia) was discontinued by registered nurse (RN) C without a physician's order which resulted in the resident being transferred to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation and treatment, and had a subsequent three-night hospitalization for observation of his condition. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on a review of the corrective actions the provider implemented following the incident.
  2. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, South Dakota Department of health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI) review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure:*The front door code was changed following an elopement (when a resident who needs supervision leaves the premises or safe area without authorization or necessary supervision) from the facility for one of one sampled resident (2) who knew that door code and remained outside unsupervised for about 18.5 hours on 3/28/26 through 3/29/26.*Three of four sampled newly admitted residents (3, 4, and 5) were assessed for their elopement risk per provider policy.
March 5, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to monitor and implement pressure ulcer (skin and/or underlying tissue injury due to prolonged pressure) healing and prevention interventions for one of one sampled resident (7) who was identified at risk for developing pressure ulcers and developed a stage II (2; open wound or blister with partial-thickness skin loss) pressure ulcer to his coccyx (tailbone), right buttock, and left buttock and one of one sampled resident (7) who was identified at risk for developing a pressure ulcer developed a stage II pressure ulcer to his right buttock.
  2. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, policy review, South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI) review, and staffs' training records review, the provider failed to ensure the residents were protected from risk of injury or harm by staff members failing to safely use lift devices and to provide supervision for:*One of one sampled resident (100) who sustained a skin injury to his buttocks after a total body lift (a mechanical lift and sling used to lift a person's full body) was pulled out from under him by registered nurse (RN)/former director of nursing (DON) DD.*One of one sampled resident (36) identified as unable to safely operate a lift recliner chair and sustained a skin laceration to his head when he fell from that chair onto the floor after being left unsupervised.*One of one sampled resident (10) identified as needing to be transferred by two [...]
  3. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the staff completed and documented controlled medications (medications at risk for abuse and addiction) supply counts for five of five medication carts (Mystic Ranch, Park View, Focus, East, and [NAME] Lane), failed to prevent the theft of one of one sampled resident's (94) controlled pain medication (oxycodone) by registered nurse (RN) FF, and failed to ensure insulin was administered according to the physician's order for one of one sampled resident (10) who was evaluated at an emergency room after being administered the wrong insulin by licensed practical nurse (LPN) CC.
  4. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (100) who [NAME] left alone in his room with his nebulizer (a device that converts liquid medication into an inhalable mist) machine administered by certified medication aide(CMA) (EE), was assessed for the resident's ability to safely sefl-adminster that medicaiton.
  5. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI) review, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to report incidents to the SD DOH within the required time frame, for one of one sampled resident (10) who fell on the floor while being transferred with a sit-to-stand mechanical lift (a mechanical lift used to assist from a seated to a standing position) by certified nursing assistant (CNA) N without the assistance of another staff member, one of one sampled resident (49) related to allegations of having been verbally abused by CNA K, and one of one sampled resident (44) related to allegations of having been verbally abused by CNA E.
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.20.1 October 2025 review, the provider failed to ensure one of one sampled resident's (11) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, a tool used to evaluate a resident's health status and to develop an individualized care plan to manage the resident's care needs, were accurately coded in the areas for an invasive mechanical ventilator (a device that delivers air into the lungs through a hole in the neck into the windpipe or a flexible tube inserted in the mouth or nose through the windpipe) and a non-invasive mechanical ventilator (positive air pressure delivered through a mask into the lungs to treat severe breathing difficulties).
  7. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure resident care plans (personalized plan to address a resident's care needs, goals, and interventions) were revised to reflect their current care needs for three of twenty-five sampled residents (6, 7, and 29).
  8. D
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to identify and implement specific care approaches that addressed the mental and psychosocial needs of one of two sampled residents (7) with diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event (PTSD) to mitigate trauma triggers and prevent re-traumatization.
July 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to administer a physician-ordered BiPAP (a device that delivers pressurized air through a specialized mask to assist with breathing) for one of one sampled resident who was lethargic and unresponsive the following morning and was transferred to the hospital.
June 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility reported incident (FRI), observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to implement fall prevention interventions as described in the care plan for one of one (1) resident who fell and sustained injuries that required treatment at an emergency department.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure staff followed the care plan regarding the hydration needs for one of two sampled residents (2).
January 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI) review, record review, observation, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure Buprenorphine (pain medication) transdermal (TD) (delivered through the skin) patch was removed before a second Buprenorphine patch was applied to one of one sampled resident (1) whose altered mental state required evaluation at a hospital.
October 17, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteA. Based on interview, observation, record review, and policy review the provider failed to ensure the safety of one of one sampled resident (14 ) who required the assistance of two staff during transfers with a sit-to-stand mechanical lift.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, cleaning log review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure food items were appropriately stored and labeled and to maintain a clean and sanitary food service environment in one of one kitchen and one of one kitchenette.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the care plan for one of two sampled residents (73) was updated after her catheter was removed.
September 8, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the proper Medicare notices were completed and provided for two of two sampled residents (79 and 84) prior to their discharge from skilled services.
  2. E
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to provide bathing and nursing restorative services in accordance with the care plan for three of five sampled residents (26, 70, and 76).
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to follow their policy to ensure: *A thorough wound assessment or wound data collection form by a registered nurse (RN) had been completed for resident 63 when a right heel ulcer was identified on 5/30/23. *Physician notification occurred and had not been delayed one week, with no treatment orders.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on March 5, 2026.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. B
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · March 5, 2026 · no revisit needed

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
June 4, 2026Fine $19,635
March 5, 2026Fine $70,980
June 18, 2025Fine $9,620
October 17, 2024Fine $11,466

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeSouth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.943.793.86
Registered nurses0.950.800.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.323.263.42
Nurse aides2.52
Licensed practical nurses0.48
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)43.5%48.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover34.8%34.7%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.20 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.17 in April to June 2025 to 3.94 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.940.954.203.32 3.9%0 of 9086
Oct to Dec 20254.030.914.283.38 3.2%0 of 9284
Jul to Sep 20254.030.864.273.41 2.3%0 of 9284
Apr to Jun 20254.170.894.473.43 6.4%0 of 9183
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
South Dakota, Jan to Mar 20263.760.793.973.259.1%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for South Dakota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
South Dakota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.65$17.71 to $21.126,860
LPNs and LVNs$25.36$23.88 to $29.472,050
Registered nurses$37.53$31.29 to $40.5214,710
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeSouth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.321.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.62.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.72.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.05.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.92.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
26.419.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.84.64.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.224.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
27.719.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
8.112.012.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.81.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.21.81.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

47.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · South Dakota: 7 better, 10 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 118 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · South Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 135 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · South Dakota: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 65 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

59.7% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota52.7% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.0% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota1.1% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 102 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

3.8% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota2.5% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 102 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: South Dakota100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sanford5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gassen, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Molbert, LaurisCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
North, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Schieffer, KevinCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Fluit, JoelCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual05/30/2024
Middleton, AimeeCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2022
Olson, NicholasCorporate officerIndividual04/08/2024
Schema, NathanCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Fraser, ThomasOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/25/2022
Morrison, TonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Orstad, KeriOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2020
Sandgren, DeeandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/16/2023
Fluit, JoelIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual06/01/2026
Dtn Staffing IncAdp of the SNFOrganization03/04/2024
Focusone SolutionsAdp of the SNFOrganization03/04/2024
Grape Tree Medical Staffing LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/13/2018
SanfordAdp of the SNFOrganization11/28/2025
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Fluit, JoelAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2022
Fraser, ThomasAdp of the SNFIndividual04/25/2022
Gassen, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Middleton, AimeeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/27/2022
Molbert, LaurisAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Morrison, TonyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2019
North, AndrewAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Olson, NicholasAdp of the SNFIndividual04/08/2024
Orstad, KeriAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2020
Sandgren, DeeandraAdp of the SNFIndividual07/16/2023
Schema, NathanAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022
Schieffer, KevinAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 13 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2026: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

South Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in South Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 5, 2026. The South Dakota average is 6.7.
Has Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 4 fines totaling $111,701 in the last three years.
Does Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor?
CMS lists 55 owners and managers, and links the home to Good Samaritan Society. Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection