Home / North Dakota / Park River
Good Samaritan Society - Park River
301 South County Road 12b, Park River, ND 58270 · Walsh County · (701) 284-7115
44 certified beds, about 43 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355089 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 21, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 29 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $27,417 in the last three years; the largest was $27,417, and the latest is dated January 14, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.02 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.70 of those hours.
47.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).
CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
December 4, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility reported incident (FRI) and investigation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) who displayed sexually inappropriate behaviors towards other residents. Failure to protect residents from sexual abuse placed all residents at risk for psychosocial harm and mental and emotional distress. inappropriate behaviors resulted in sexual abuse.
August 21, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of call light logs, and resident, family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and related services are available at all times to meet the residents' needs for 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #30 and #39), one supplemental resident (Resident #26) and 1 confidential resident (Resident A) who required staff assistance. Failure to provide sufficient staffing does not promote each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and/or provide a safe environment for the residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Call Light occurred on 08/20/25. This policy, revised 07/08/25, stated, When residents call light is observed/heard, go to the resident's room promptly. Respond to request as soon as possible. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of professional reference, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food is prepared and stored in a clean and sanitary manner in 2 of 2 kitchen/nutrition centers (main kitchen and nutrition center) observed. Failure to ensure cleanliness of the kitchen and proper food storage has the potential for contamination of food and may result in a foodborne illness to residents, visitors, and staff.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plans to reflect the residents' current status for 2 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #12 and #28). Failure to update care plans limited staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care for each resident.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility to ensure residents received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #30) observed during a sit-to-stand lift transfer. Failure to ensure proper use of a leg strap placed Resident #30 at risk for possible injury.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to discard expired medications in 2 of 3 medication storage areas (100-200 Wing Medication Cart and Medication Storage Room) reviewed. Failure to discard expired medications may result in decreased effectiveness of the prescribed medication.
February 19, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #2) and 1 closed record (Resident #1) dependent on staff for personal hygiene and bed mobility. Failure to assist residents who cannot perform personal hygiene and bed mobility independently may result in poor hygiene, skin issues, and decreased self-esteem.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, review of a professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #4 and #5) and 1 closed record (Resident #1) who required staff assist with toileting. Failure to provide toileting may result in a loss of dignity and placed the residents at risk for skin breakdown, poor grooming/hygiene, decreased self-esteem, urinary tract infections, and risk for fall and/or injuries.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #6) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
July 11, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 5 of 12 sampled residents (#1, #3, #13, #15, and #25). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #17) and 1 closed record (Resident #86) reviewed who experienced high and/or low blood sugars. Failure to notify the physician of blood sugar results above and/or below the ordered parameters may result in complications to the resident and prevent the physician from evaluating the need to alter treatment.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of Medicare Part A letters/notices, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or their representative completed the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) for 1 of 3 supplemental residents (Resident #16) discharged from Medicare Part A in the past six months. Failure to ensure the completion of the SNFABN limited the resident/representative's ability to exercise their rights regarding Medicare Part A services.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteTHIS IS A REPEAT DEFICIENCY FROM THE COMPLAINT SURVEY COMPLETED ON 03/12/24. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect residents' current status for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #17 and Resident #25). Failure to update care plans limited staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteTHIS IS A REPEAT DEFICIENCY FROM THE SURVEY COMPLETED ON 06/08/23. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #15) observed during a sit-to-stand lift transfer. Failure to ensure proper use of a leg strap as care planned placed Resident #15 at risk for possible injury.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #7) observed during medication administration. Two medication errors occurred during staff administration of 25 medications, resulting in an eight percent error rate. Failure to properly prepare and administer medications may result in residents receiving an ineffective dose and experiencing adverse reactions.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications in 1 of 2 medication carts (300/400 cart) observed during medication administration. Failure to obtain a label for an insulin pen and identify an open date may result in a resident receiving an incorrect or ineffective dose of insulin.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #3) observed with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Failure to practice infection control standards by ensuring staff use the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) has the potential to transmit infections to residents, staff, and visitors.
March 12, 2024Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility grievances, review of the North Dakota Long Term Care Ombudsman Program's Guide to Resident Rights, and staff interview, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and failed to provide resident care in a manner and an environment that promotes, maintains, or enhances their quality of life on 1 of 1 days of survey. Failure to treat residents with dignity and speak respectfully has the potential to affect the residents' psychosocial wellbeing.
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of facility call light logs, resident interviews, and staff interview, the facility failed to promptly respond to residents' call lights for 4 of 4 confidential residents (Residents A, B, C, and D) who required staff assistance. Failure to promptly respond to resident calls for assistance may result in residents experiencing unmet needs and may negatively affect the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs regarding call lights for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) observed during cares. Failure to ensure residents can reach/access the call light may result in unmet needs and the inability to call for help.
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility grievances, review of facility policy, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective grievance system for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #3) with a grievance regarding missing items. Failure to act upon resident and/or their representatives' grievances may result in continued resident dissatisfaction.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and resident interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the current status for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2). Failure to review and revise care plans limits staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to promote the healing or prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #2) with current pressure ulcers. Failure to consistently apply pressure relieving devices as ordered may result in the deterioration of new/existing pressure ulcers and delayed healing.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to use an assistive device necessary to safely transfer a resident and ensure the chair alarm is in place to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) observed during a transfer. Failure to use a gait belt, lock the wheelchair brakes during the transfer, and place the chair alarm may result in falls and/or injuries to the resident.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of professional reference, and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting/check and change cares for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #2) who required staff assistance with toileting. Failure to provide toileting/check and change cares as care planned may result in a loss of dignity and placed the resident at risk for skin breakdown and urinary tract infections (UTIs).
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #2) observed during incontinence cares. Failure to follow infection control standards has the potential to spread infections to residents, staff, and visitors.
June 8, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteTHIS IS A REPEAT CITATION FROM THE STANDARD SURVEY CONDUCTED ON [DATE] Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment for 5 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #20, #27, #29, #31, and #240) reviewed for advance directives. Failure to discuss the residents' resuscitation status with the resident and/or the resident's representative and ensure the medical record accurately reflected each resident's code level limited the facility's ability to communicate to direct care staff and emergency personnel the residents' choice in the event of a medical emergency.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wrote1. Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #2, #7 and #17) observed for insulin pen preparation. Failure to properly prepare insulin pens per policy may result in the resident receiving an inaccurate dose of insulin.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #20 and #31) who required a mechanical lift for transfers. Failure to ensure proper use of a mechanical lift placed all residents at risk for accident and/or injury.
Fire safety inspections
11 fire safety citations on file: 7 on August 21, 2025, 3 on July 11, 2024, 1 on June 8, 2023.
Every fire safety citation11 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 14, 2026 | Fine | $27,417 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.02 | 4.42 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.70 | 0.93 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.51 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.87 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.45 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.4% | 48.8% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 36.4% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.22 on weekdays and 2.51 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.31 in April to June 2025 to 3.02 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.02 | 0.70 | 3.22 | 2.51 | 3.0% | 0 of 90 | 43 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.17 | 0.92 | 3.35 | 2.73 | 9.6% | 0 of 92 | 40 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.26 | 0.80 | 3.45 | 2.77 | 2.2% | 0 of 92 | 39 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.31 | 0.88 | 3.57 | 2.66 | 3.2% | 0 of 91 | 40 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Dakota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.57 | 0.92 | 4.81 | 3.96 | 11.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.2 | 19.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.7 | 17.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.9 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanford | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2019 |
| The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2019 |
| Johnson, Joel | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 01/09/2013 | |
| Carlson, Lara | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/17/2022 | |
| Morrison, Tony | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Cain, James | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Dykhouse, Dana | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Engbrecht, Wesley | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Gassen, William | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Gulsvig, Neil | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Lundeen, Mark | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Molbert, Lauris | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| North, Andrew | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Shulkin, David | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Teiken, Brent | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Ventling-Herrmann, Marnie | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Fluit, Joel | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Gassen, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/30/2024 | |
| Middleton, Aimee | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/27/2022 | |
| Olson, Nicholas | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/08/2024 | |
| Rogers, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/13/2022 | |
| Schema, Nathan | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on July 11, 2024: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.51 hours per resident per day, below the North Dakota average of 3.80.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Lutheran Sunset Home Grafton, 18.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: North Dakota Health and Human Services, Health Facilities Unit, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: North Dakota Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, (855) 462-5465. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: North Dakota Deficiency Statement Search, where North Dakota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Good Samaritan Society - Park River's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Good Samaritan Society - Park River 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Good Samaritan Society - Park River get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 21, 2025. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
- Has Good Samaritan Society - Park River been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $27,417 in the last three years.
- Does Good Samaritan Society - Park River accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Good Samaritan Society - Park River?
- CMS lists 23 owners and managers, and links the home to Good Samaritan Society. Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.