Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Graham

Graham Oaks Care Center

1325 First St., Graham, TX 76450 · Young County · (940) 549-8787

110 certified beds, about 76 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455968 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 15 health citations since December 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $34,690 in the last three years; the largest was $17,345, and the latest is dated October 10, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.99 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.

94.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
June 14, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 5 of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #6) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure the staff developed the comprehensive care plan goals and interventions from the comprehensive assessment for Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #6. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans for Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #4 described the resident's preference and potential for future discharge. [...]
April 9, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 77 resident rooms observed (Resident #8) reviewed for accidents and hazards. Facility staff failed to remove an extension cord from Resident #8's room. This deficient practice could place resident at risk of a fire hazard or tripping.
March 25, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. CNA A failed to perform proper hand hygiene including changing gloves while providing incontinence care to Resident #1 on 03/25/26. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infection.
November 8, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. C
    Follow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
    F844 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 9, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide written notice to the State Agency responsible for licensing the facility at the time of change, for a change in the facility's administrator for 1 of 1 facility. The facility failed to notify the State Agency of a change in the facilities administrator within 30 days. This failure could result in the lack of knowledge and inability to connect with the appropriate leadership of the facility.
October 10, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. J
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for one (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for neglect. On 9/2/25 the facility allowed Hospitality Aide A to perform a transfer on Resident #1 and failed to ensure she was trained and permitted per her job description to use Resident #1's personal medical transfer equipment to perform a transfer. No staff in the facility had been trained in the use of Resident #1's personal medical transfer equipment, and the Director of Therapy had asked the former DON to ensure her staff did not use the device. The transfer resulted in a fall during which Resident #1 received a fracture in her left knee. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 9/2/25 and ended on 9/3/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. [...]
  2. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for accident hazards were free from accident hazards in their environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 1's received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. The lift used by facility staff was not an adequate assistive device since there was no manual for proper staff training and the device was the personal property of Resident #1. This resulted in a fall during a transfer in which Resident #1 received a fracture on her left knee on 9/3/25. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 9/2/25 and ended on 9/3/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents at risk for serious injuries, a decline in the resident's condition, hospitalization, or death.
May 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 9, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and/or accurate for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for clinical records in that: The RN A did not document Resident # 1 was transferred to the ER on 5.12.25. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate and incomplete clinical records resulting in an inaccuracy in the care the resident received.
January 22, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation , interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 24 residents (Resident #4, Resident #44 and Resident #76) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's comprehensive care plan was person centered and measurable when addressing Resident #4's Tobacco use. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's comprehensive care plan contained the resident's use of Trapeze bar (medical device used to help patient move and positions themselves in bed) for bed mobility. 3. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation , interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 2 of 11 residents (Residents #4 and #24) reviewed for assessments . 1. The Facility failed to ensure Resident #4's MDS was accurately completed with the residents tobacco use. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #24's MDS was accurately completed with Resident #24's anticoagulant. These failures could place residents at risk by decreasing the accurate information available to determine the care and services needed for each resident.
October 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures prohibited and prevented abuse, neglect, and exploitation, of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 4 employee files (Employee C) reviewed for abuse protocol. The facility failed to complete annual Criminal Background Checks for Employee C. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
December 7, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. G
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 8, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 3 (Resident # 55) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55's pain was managed at a level that did not interfere with the resident's sleep or day to day activities This deficient practice could place residents at risk of pain, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life.
  2. E
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #39 and #56) whose record were reviewed for recent admission to the facility, in that: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a baseline care plan had not been developed within 48 hours of his admission. 2. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a baseline care plan had not been developed within 48 hours of her admission. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs and to promote their physical and mental health and well-being within their new living environment.
  3. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 8 employee files (Employee C) reviewed for abuse protocol. The facility did not complete reference checks on Employee C, with a hire date of 11/27/2023, prior to employment at the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the comprehensive care plan after the assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #'s 53) reviewed for plan of care revision. The facility failed to include in the care plan, nutritional interventions for a significant weight loss for Resident #53 after the 11/26/2023 Comprehensive MDS . This failure could place the residents at risk of staff and providers not having the most current information for the Resident's plan of care.
  5. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who have not used psychotropic drugs are not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record and gradual dose reductions were attempted for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #56) whose records were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admission orders included an order for the antipsychotic medication Zyprexa 5 mg for a diagnosis of depression, with a start date on 04/18/2023. She did not have a diagnosis or indication of use for antipsychotic medication. The facility's failure placed the resident at risk for adverse side effects from receiving antipsychotic medication that was not indicated for use.

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 9, 2026, 1 on January 22, 2025, 1 on December 7, 2023.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. F
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · April 9, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 9, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · April 9, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. C
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · April 9, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. C
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · January 22, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. C
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · December 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
October 10, 2025Fine $17,345
October 10, 2025Fine $17,345

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)2.993.393.86
Registered nurses0.370.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.572.983.42
Nurse aides1.80
Licensed practical nurses0.82
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)94.4%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover100.0%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 4.32 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.17 on weekdays and 2.57 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.09 in April to June 2025 to 2.99 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20262.990.373.172.57 0.0%0 of 9076
Oct to Dec 20252.140.362.361.60 0.0%1 of 9278
Jul to Sep 20251.990.352.101.71 0.0%0 of 9280
Apr to Jun 20252.090.242.241.71 0.0%0 of 9181
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
28.915.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.70.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.63.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.414.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.53.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.19.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
18.725.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
23.712.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.72.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.22.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Graham Oaks Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

55.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 60 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 87 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

51.7% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: COUNTY OF THROCKMORTON. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
County of Throckmorton5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%07/01/2022
Brockman, GregoryManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2021
Gober, KirbyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/20/2014
Hibbitts, KaseyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/18/2020
Hodges, CalebManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2023
Mitchell, KlaytonManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/31/2020
Wells, CaseyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual05/10/2004
Huggins, LindaCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2022
Willig, ZacharyCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Gober, KirbyCorporate officerIndividual06/20/2014
Graham I Enterprises, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2019
Blake, GaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Blake, MalisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Graham I Enterprises, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/12/2025
Blake, GaryAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2019
Cook, RoxyAdp of the SNFIndividual04/12/2025
Purdy, AaronAdp of the SNFIndividual04/12/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on June 14, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 10, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 25, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.57 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Graham Oaks Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Graham Oaks Care Center 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Graham Oaks Care Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on April 9, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Graham Oaks Care Center been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $34,690 in the last three years.
Does Graham Oaks Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Graham Oaks Care Center?
CMS lists 17 owners and managers, and links the home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare. Legal business name: COUNTY OF THROCKMORTON.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection