Find a nursing home

Home / Ohio / Greenfield

Greenfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation

238 South Washington Street, Greenfield, OH 45123 · Highland County · (937) 981-3349

50 certified beds, about 37 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366038 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 22, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 15 health citations since May 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.47 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.71 of those hours.

53.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).

CMS links it to Michael Slyk, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
4E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 22, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) determined whether the self-administration of a topical medication was clinically appropriate. This affected one (Resident #09) of one resident reviewed for self-administration. The facility census was 39 residents.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for residents with a gastrostomy tube and receiving tube feedings. This affected one (Resident #07) of two residents reviewed for enteral tube feeding care plans. The facility census was 39. Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #07 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus type II, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, atherosclerosis, protein-calorie malnutrition, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, chronic pain, sciatica, asthma, cerebral infarction, anxiety, depression, and epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #07 had minimally impaired cognition. [...]
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interviews, facility policy review, review of job descriptions, and review of information from the Ohio Board of Nursing, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer interventions were implemented timely and weekly assessments, including staging, were completed per the professional standards of practice for Resident #28. This affected one (Resident #28) out of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 39. Findings Included:Review of the medical record for Resident #28, revealed an admission date of 03/11/25. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, heart failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, weakness and muscle weakness and multiple sclerosis. [...]
  4. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe, clarify and follow a prescriber's order for a resident who was on a voiding trial after removal of a Foley catheter. This affected one (Resident #06) of five residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 39 residents.
August 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    F568 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, review of resident fund account documentation, review of self reported incident, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate handling of resident funds. This affected four Residents (#6, #24, #42, #46) of four reviewed for resident funds. Facility identified 19 Residents (#2, #3, #6, #7, #8, #15, #19, #21, #24, #25, #26, #29, #37, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47) potentially affected by the accounting practice. Facility census was 41.
  2. E
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, review of the facility investigation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for Resident #51 who had an allegation of abuse and for Residents #7, #42, and #46 who were involved with an allegation of misappropriation. This affected four residents (#7, #42, #46, and #51) out of four reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The facility identified 19 residents (#2, #3, #6, #7, #8, #15, #19, #21, #24, #25, #26, #29, #37, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47) who were potentially affected by the accounting practices related to the misappropriation SRI #261495 and one resident (#51) identified in the abuse SRI #262018. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: 1. [...]
  3. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, review of resident fund account documentation, review of self reported incident investigation, staff interviews, and policy review, facility failed to ensure residents were free from the potential of misappropriation. This affected three Residents (#7 #42 and #46) of three reviewed for misappropriation. Facility census was 41.
  4. D
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    F627 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge plan was implemented. This affected one resident (#48) of three reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 02/19/25 and a discharge date of 05/22/25. Diagnoses included pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, embolism of thoracic aorta, cerebral infarct, bipolar disorder, schizophreniform disorder, skin picking disorder and neuropathy. Review of the plan of care dated 03/05/25 revealed Resident #48 would possibly require discharge planning with interventions to provide information on community resources and utilize resources (for example: home health care) and participate in therapy. [...]
December 5, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness. This affected all 42 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 42.
  2. E
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of a facility provided resident list, and review of a menu spreadsheet, the facility failed to ensure residents received food portions based on the menu spreadsheet. This affected 17 (#02, #04, #05, #06, #07, #09, #11, #12, #13, #14, #23, #30, #32, #33, #36, #38 and #40) of 17 residents that received mechanical soft or pureed diets in a facility census of 42.
  3. E
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    F808 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of a meal spreadsheet, and policy review, the facility failed to serve food as prescribed for residents on a controlled carbohydrate therapeutic diet. This affected 15 (#8, #3, #28, #33, #25, #37, #7, #32, #16, #2, #29, #147, #145, #148, and #18) of 15 residents who received a controlled carbohydrate diet. The facility total census was 42. Findings Included: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety, somnolence, migraines, fibromyalgia, encephalopathy, diabetes, anxiety disorder, history of cellulitis of limb, morbid obesity, irritable bowel, cognitive impairment, chronic kidney disease, chronic pain, and psychosis. [...]
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, manufacturer user manual review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 user's manual, and review of a government website, the facility failed to accurately code the status of a non-invasive mechanical ventilation on resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected one (#24) of one residents reviewed for ventilators. The facility census was 42.
  5. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and medical record review, the facility failed to to ensure resident Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents were accurate regarding a resident's current conditions and diagnoses. This affected one (#15) of two residents reviewed for PASARR documents. The census was 42.
  6. D
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    F646 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority with a significant change Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident with a change in their mental health condition. This affected one (#02) of two residents reviewed for PASARR documents. The facility census was 42.
May 24, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 23, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) following an addition of a residents's new psychiatric diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 42.

Fire safety inspections

12 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 22, 2026, 2 on December 5, 2024, 8 on May 24, 2023.

Every fire safety citation12 citations
  1. E
    Have correct number of accessible exits for each story.
    K 241 · April 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · April 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Follow proper procedures when the fire alarm was out of service for more than 4 hours.
    K 346 · December 5, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have correct number of accessible exits for each story.
    K 241 · December 5, 2024 · fire safety evaluation s
  5. F
    Have stairways and smokeproof enclosures used as exits that meet safety requirements.
    K 225 · May 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have correct number of accessible exits for each story.
    K 241 · May 24, 2023 · fire safety evaluation s
  7. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · May 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · May 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · May 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · May 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · May 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOhioUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.473.693.86
Registered nurses0.710.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.943.283.42
Nurse aides1.81
Licensed practical nurses0.95
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)53.1%48.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover55.6%43.9%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 5.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.68 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.35 in April to June 2025 to 3.47 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.470.713.682.94 2.6%0 of 9037
Oct to Dec 20253.390.733.662.72 1.5%0 of 9240
Jul to Sep 20253.360.553.493.02 4.3%0 of 9241
Apr to Jun 20253.350.673.592.75 3.5%0 of 9143
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Ohio, Jan to Mar 20263.640.603.803.244.6%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Ohio

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Ohio, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.76$17.93 to $21.4463,280
LPNs and LVNs$29.78$27.34 to $31.6839,900
Registered nurses$39.67$38.08 to $47.61143,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOhioUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.25.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.20.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.73.23.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.56.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.63.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.78.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.824.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.812.912.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.21.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.81.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: GREENFIELD SNF INC. CMS links this home to Michael Slyk, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
D'amico, Daniel5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual33%12/01/2018
Slyk, Michael5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual67%09/01/2022
D'amico, DanielCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2018
Slyk, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2018
Mstc Development IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization12/01/2018
Ryder, GwynnOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/28/2025
Mstc Development IncAdp of the SNFOrganization07/02/2025
D'amico, DanielAdp of the SNFIndividual12/01/2018
Juschka, DirkAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Ryder, GwynnAdp of the SNFIndividual03/28/2025
Slyk, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual12/01/2018
Valentour, LeonaAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 22, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 22, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 5, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 22, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.94 hours per resident per day, below the Ohio average of 3.28.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Greenfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Greenfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Greenfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 22, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.
Has Greenfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Greenfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Greenfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation?
CMS lists 12 owners and managers, and links the home to Michael Slyk. Legal business name: GREENFIELD SNF INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection