Home / Ohio / Washington Court Hou
555 North Glenn Ave, Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 · Fayette County · (740) 335-9290
99 certified beds, about 87 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365928 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 26, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 22 health citations since September 2019, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.53 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.45 of those hours.
42.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Hcf Management, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on infection control log review and interview, the facility failed to ensure facility and community acquired organism was identified and tracked in the facility's infection control log. This had the potential to affected all 88 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the January 2024 infection control log, the urinary tract infection (UTI) no catheter flow tracking sheet revealed Resident #143 was prescribed the antibiotic Augmentin for a UTI with no identification of the organism causing the UTI. Review of the February 2024 infection control log, the UTI no catheter flow tracking sheet revealed Resident #12, #144 and #145 were admitted from the hospital with antibiotic orders with no identifying organism causing the UTI. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify one resident's (#30) family of a change in condition and new physician orders related to the change in condition. This affected one (Resident #30) of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, record reviews, and hospital discharge record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #188 had a dressing order in place and [NAME] hose ordered and failed to ensure Resident #199's weekly wound assessments were documented along with daily treatments completed for a surgical wound. Furthermore, the facility also failed to ensure a hospice certification was present for Resident #5. This affected three residents (#5, #188, and #199) of four residents reviewed. The facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, review of wound notes and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent facility acquired suspected deep tissue injury (a type of pressure-induced damage to underlying tissues, such as muscle and subcutaneous layers, that appears as a localized area of discolored intact skin (purple or maroon) or a blood filled blister, without a visible open wound) to bilateral heels. This affected one (Resident #188) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review,interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received medication. This affected one (Resident #10) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census is 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dry eye syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands, bell's palsy, and candidiasis of skin and nails. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had mild cognitive deficit and was frequently incontinent of bowel and always incontinent of bladder. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and facility medication storage policy, the facility failed to ensure outdated medications were removed from stock. This affected one (Resident #53) out of 11 resident's insulin reviewed. Facility census is 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, and hospital record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when they failed to monitor Resident #2 who was on Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication) and had a decreasing hemoglobin and did not complete a Physician recommended complete blood count (CBC) lab test. This resulted in harm when Resident #2 had bloody tarry stool and was admitted to the hospital for three days with a hemoglobin lab value (a test to detect anemia with a normal range of 11.5 to 15.4 g/dl) of 4.5 grams per dececiliter (g/dl) upon hospital admission. Resident #2 had to receive three units of packed red blood cells and was found to have a gastric ulcer that required clamping. This affected one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed on anticoagulant medication. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a pressure ulcer dressing change per physicians orders for Resident #79. This affected one (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff did not follow infection control procedures during a dressing change for Resident #79. Facility staff did not follow infection control techniques when they removed Resident #79's soiled dressing and did not change gloves and then cleaned the wound with the soiled gloves. This affected one (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow the therapeutic spreadsheet and provide food portions as planned by a registered dietitian. This had to the potential to affect all 78 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to store foods with label and dates and discard expired foods. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided dignified care related to residents names being visible on the outside of clothing. This affected one (Resident #18) of 24 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, review of the facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had an updated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). This affected one (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased in observation, resident and staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wound was assessed and monitored after admission. The affected one (Resident #184) of one resident reviewed for non-pressure skin impairments. The facility identified nine residents with non-pressure wounds. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observation, interviews of staff and residents, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion (ROM) received the appropriate treatment and services to increase and/or to prevent a further decrease in ROM. This affected two (Residents #4 and #34) of two residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility identified six current residents with a contracture(s). The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, hospital record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #33's fall interventions were implemented to prevent falls in accordance with the resident's fall risk care plan. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #33's bilateral side rails were not in place and the resident experienced a fall resulting in a laceration to the head and bruising. The resident was subsequently sent to the hospital and required staples. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented a second resident's (Resident #32) fall interventions in accordance with the care plan. This affected two (Resident #32 and Resident #33) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to serve and distribute food under sanitary conditions during dining observation. This had the potential to affect 25 (Resident #3, #10, #11, #13, #20, #24, #28, #32, #35, #38, #40, #43, #45, #46, #48, #49, #50, #53, #56, #57, #61, #67, #71, #74, and #77) residents residing on the A wing. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to cleanse a blood glucometer machine per manufacture instructions. This had the potential to affect 23 (Resident #2, #8, #9, #13, #20, #30, #31, #32, #39, #42, #46, #54, #58, #60, #66, #67, #69, #83, #88, #140, #141, #142, and #339) residents who require blood glucose monitoring, and failed to ensure Resident #70 who was in contact isolation, had a sign posted on the door to alert staff and visitors to see the nurse for necessary precautions to take before entering the room. This affected one of one residents reviewed under infection precautions area. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update and revise Resident #32's care plan to reflect use of hoyer lift at times with transfers and failed to update and revise Resident #5's care plan to reflect cleaning techniques for feeding tube. This affected two residents (Resident #32 and Resident #5) of 26 residents reviewed for care plan accuracy. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide continuity of care when they did not transcribe three new pain medication orders for a resident following an emergency room visit. This affected one resident (Resident #32) of four residents reviewed for pain . The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a physicians order was in place for an indwelling urinary catheter (foley) for Resident #85. This affected one (Resident #85) of three residents with catheters in the facility. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and staff interview and facility policy, the facility failed to date and label oxygen tubing for two (Resident #29 and Resident #65) of 28 residents on oxygen therapy. The facility census was 89.
13 fire safety citations on file: 7 on March 26, 2025, 2 on December 27, 2022, 4 on September 12, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 6, 2024 | Payment Denial | 20 days from November 30, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.53 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.23 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.02 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.7% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.18 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.66 on weekdays and 3.23 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.61 in April to June 2025 to 3.53 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.53 | 0.45 | 3.66 | 3.23 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 87 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.37 | 0.42 | 3.48 | 3.07 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.43 | 0.40 | 3.56 | 3.10 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.61 | 0.42 | 3.77 | 3.21 | 0.2% | 0 of 91 | 87 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: ODH Nurse Aide Training Program Locations, as of October 8, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Court House Manor Stna Program CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.9 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.0 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Court House Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (62.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
62.2% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.
14.3% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 135 eligible stays.
9.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 76 eligible stays.
50.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HCF OF WASHINGTON, INC.. CMS links this home to Hcf Management, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chad M. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 12/13/2021 |
| David V. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 12/13/2021 |
| Jeffrey L. Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-29-04 Revocable Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kendra M. U | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kerri a. Ro | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kevan R. Un | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kristen S. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joann C. Unverferth 12-31-12 Irrevocable Grantor Trust Fbo Kyle J. Unv | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 12/13/2021 |
| Joseph L. Unverferth 12-15-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 12/13/2021 |
| Lawrence G. Unverferth 12-13-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 12/13/2021 |
| R. Steven Unverferth 12-14-11 Irrv Grantor Tr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 12/13/2021 |
| Klay, Celeste | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/01/2011 | |
| Romes, Kerri | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Shaw, Anthony | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/29/1994 | |
| Souder, Brittany | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/16/2024 | |
| Unverferth, Chad | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/01/2008 | |
| Klay, Celeste | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Romes, Kerri | Corporate director | Individual | 03/29/2019 | |
| Souder, Brittany | Corporate director | Individual | 07/16/2024 | |
| Klay, Celeste | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Romes, Kerri | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2019 | |
| Shaw, Anthony | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/26/2015 | |
| Unverferth, Chad | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2008 | |
| Hcf Management, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2008 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.