What is Greenway Manor's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Greenway Manor 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Greenway Manor get at its last inspection?

2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 25, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.

Has Greenway Manor been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Greenway Manor accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Greenway Manor?

CMS lists 19 owners and managers. Legal business name: RIVER VALLEY NURSING HOME INC.

Greenway Manor: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 25, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 8 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.91 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.

53.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

009/23

410/24

212/25

202/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

Potential for minimal harm

February 25, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations

D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 23, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (R20) of 12 reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). Surveyor observed R20 not being shaved on 2/23/26, 2/24/26, and the morning of 2/25/26. R20's care plan, wife, and R20 indicated he needs assistance with personal hygiene and grooming. Evidenced by:The facility policy, Nursing Care, Activities of Daily Living, dated 10/25, states, in part;.A program of activities of daily living is provided to residents to preserve ADL function, promote independence, self-esteem and dignity and achieve maximum level of function. Staff assist is provided as needed to complete tasks. On 2/23/26 at 4:04PM, Surveyor met R20. [...]
D

Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.

F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 23, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 2 of 3 residents (R6 & R32) who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. R6 has a diagnosis of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and does not have a complete trauma assessment or a care plan addressing triggers, resident specific approaches, or interventions. The facility did not care plan R32's post-traumatic stress disorder and failed to include triggers and interventions to best support R32. This is evidenced by: Example 1: R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include major depressive disorder and PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). [...]

December 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations

D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 20, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. An allegation of abuse was reported by staff to the facility on [DATE]. The alleged allegation of abuse had occurred 2 to 3 weeks prior. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Policy and Procedure for Grievances, Mistreatment Investigations, Mistreatment Prevention and Injuries of Unknown Source, dated 12/18/25, states, in part: . Purpose: To prevent and prohibit mistreatment, abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, incidents of unknown source, and misappropriation of property of all residents. [...]
D

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 20, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated, and that steps were taken to prevent further abuse for 1 of 4 resident reviewed (R1). On 12/18/2025, the facility became aware of an abuse allegation regarding R1. The facility failed to provide evidence to prevent further abuse to R1 and other residents. The facility did not complete a thorough investigation of the alleged allegation of abuse. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Policy and Procedure for Grievances, Mistreatment Investigations, Mistreatment Prevention and Injuries of Unknown Source, dated 12/18/25, states, in part: . Purpose: [...]

October 3, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations

E

Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement the facility's Abuse policy that prohibits staff to resident abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R46) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14. Specifically, the facility did not protect R46 and other residents during the abuse investigation and failed to conduct a thorough investigation into the allegation of physical abuse as instructed in the facility's Abuse policy. This failure had the potential to negatively impact all 46 residents currently residing at the facility.
D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R46) reviewed in the sample of 14 residents to the State Agency (SA) immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made when the incident involved abuse. This failure had the possibility to negatively impact all 46 residents currently residing at the facility.
D

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R46) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14 residents. This failure had the potential to negatively impact all 46 residents currently residing at the facility.
D

Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.

F947 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 6 (Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA5 and CNA8) completed the minimum of 12 hours of inservice training per year. The lack of inservice trainings could have a negative impact for all 46 residents currently residing at the facility.

September 7, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

20 fire safety citations on file: 5 on February 25, 2026, 5 on October 3, 2024, 10 on September 7, 2023.

Every fire safety citation20 citations

E
Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.

K 351 · February 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.

K 912 · February 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · February 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

K 521 · February 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.

K 920 · February 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

K 511 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.

E 13 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.

K 355 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.

K 362 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.

K 131 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Construct fire resistant interior walls.

K 331 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

K 363 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.

K 912 · September 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Wisconsin	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	2.91	4.21	3.86
Registered nurses	0.58	0.99	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	2.74	3.77	3.42
Nurse aides	2.01
Licensed practical nurses	0.32
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	53.8%	46.9%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	27.3%	39.7%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.98 on weekdays and 2.74 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 14.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.06 in April to June 2025 to 2.91 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	2.91	0.58	2.98	2.74	14.1%	31 of 90	47
Oct to Dec 2025	3.80	0.78	3.94	3.44	11.1%	0 of 92	50
Jul to Sep 2025	3.92	0.82	4.08	3.51	4.5%	0 of 92	49
Apr to Jun 2025	4.06	0.90	4.21	3.66	5.1%	0 of 91	49
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 2026	4.19	0.95	4.36	3.74	8.8%	0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Wisconsin

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Wisconsin, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$21.70	$19.03 to $22.75	28,370
LPNs and LVNs	$30.65	$28.67 to $36.06	7,390
Registered nurses	$45.93	$39.39 to $49.33	68,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Wisconsin	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	25.5	16.1	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.8	2.1	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.4	2.6	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.2	3.3	3.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	16.5	18.4	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.6	5.0	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	13.0	15.8	15.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.8	1.7	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.6	2.3	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Greenway Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

47.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Wisconsin: 52 better, 26 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 6 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

28.6% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin54.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

3.9% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin2.2% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: RIVER VALLEY NURSING HOME INC.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Meise, Susan	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Individual	14%	09/25/2001
Shaffer, Sandra	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Individual	12%	03/15/2004
Gorman, Brian	Direct ownership interest	Individual		06/01/2021
Stephenson National Bank & Trust	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization	11%	01/01/2025
Gorman, Thomas	Corporate director	Individual		09/21/2016
Hahn, Alisha	Corporate director	Individual		06/01/2017
Mazwell, Kathleen	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2002
Meise, Susan	Corporate director	Individual		04/01/2017
Scoles, Mark	Corporate director	Individual		09/20/2017
Sprecher, Gerald	Corporate director	Individual		09/01/2010
Gorman, Thomas	Corporate officer	Individual		09/21/2016
Mazwell, Kathleen	Corporate officer	Individual		06/30/2021
Scoles, Mark	Corporate officer	Individual		07/01/2021
Sprecher, Gerald	Corporate officer	Individual		10/01/2024
Gorman, Brian	Operational/managerial control	Individual		06/30/2021
Jones, Eric	Operational/managerial control	Individual		01/01/2026
Gorman, Brian	Adp of the SNF	Individual		06/30/2021
Hahn, Alisha	Adp of the SNF	Individual		01/01/2000
Jones, Eric	Adp of the SNF	Individual		01/01/2026

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 23, 2025: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on October 3, 2024: "Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.74 hours per resident per day, below the Wisconsin average of 3.77.

Other nursing homes nearby

Upland Hills Nursing and Rehab
Dodgeville, 15.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
Maplewood of Sauk Prairie
Sauk City, 18.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
Rivers Edge Nursing and Rehab
Muscoda, 19.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 111 citations
Ingleside Manor
Mount Horeb, 20 mi · not rated · 74 citations
Schmitt Woodland Hills
Richland Center, 20.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
Mineral Point Health Services
Mineral Point, 22.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 12 citations
Pine Valley Community Village
Richland Center, 24.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 22 citations
Sauk Co Health Care Center
Reedsburg, 24.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 18 citations

Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Division of Quality Assurance, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Wisconsin Board on Aging and Long Term Care, Ombudsman Program, 1-800-815-0015. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Wisconsin DHS Provider Search (Survey History), where Wisconsin publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Greenway Manor's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Greenway Manor 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Greenway Manor get at its last inspection?: 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 25, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
Has Greenway Manor been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Greenway Manor accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Greenway Manor?: CMS lists 19 owners and managers. Legal business name: RIVER VALLEY NURSING HOME INC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.