Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Hereford

Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation

231 Kingwood St., Hereford, TX 79045 · Deaf Smith County · (806) 364-7113

120 certified beds, about 46 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 2001

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675868 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 7, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.50 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.41 of those hours.

32.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
4E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
August 7, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 15 (Resident #19) reviewed for Resident Rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 had a DNR in place which was signed by a physician and dated by the notary public. This failure could cause the loss of valuable time when dealing with a Resident's medical emergency and possible unwarranted death.
  2. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #30) of 15 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property.1. The facility failed to implement their policy titled Abuse/Neglect and report Resident #8's black eye to state authorities.2. The facility failed to implement their policy titled Abuse/Neglect and report Resident #30's missing diamond ring to state authorities. This failure placed residents at increased risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of their property. Findings Included:1. [...]
  3. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #30) of 15 residents reviewed for reporting abuse, [...]
  4. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #30) of 15 residents reviewed for investigating abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property.1. The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of Resident #8's injury of unknown source (black eye).2. The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of misappropriation of Resident #30's property (missing diamond ring). These failures could place residents at risk of continued abuse/misappropriation of property in the facility. Findings Included:1. [...]
  5. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #39) of 15 residents reviewed for timing of assessments.1. The facility failed to complete Resident #4's significant change MDS within 14 days of her admission to hospice care on 07/16/25.2. The facility failed to complete Resident #39's significant change MDS within 14 days of her admission to hospice care on 12/26/24. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care/coordination of care. Findings Included:1. [...]
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 15 residents (Residents #37, #35, and #40) reviewed for infection control. CNA C failed to utilize clean gloves while performing incontinence care for Resident #37. LVN D failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff between uses for Resident #35 and Resident #40. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.
July 18, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure freezer items were properly stored, labeled, and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure pantry foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated. These failures could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 (LVN D, LVN E, CNA G, and CNA H) of 4 staff members and 2 of 2 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #45) in that: [...]
  3. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accommodation of needs. Resident #4's call light was not within her reach. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met and a decline in their quality of care and life.
  4. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail, assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, and review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for1 of 14 (Resident #13) residents reviewed for bed rails. Resident #13 had (1) one-third bed rail, on the right side of her bed with no documentation of resident consent, or safety assessment prior to installation. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, hinder residents from getting out of bed, and/or cause a decline in resident's ability to engage in activities of daily living.
  5. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 2 medication carts (Hall 200) and 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for drug labeling and storage and expired drugs. 4.5 pills were loose in the bottom of medication cart drawers of Hall 200 Medication cart. Medication room revealed a medication for Resident #36 that expired in June of 2023. These failures could result in residents not receiving an accurate dose of medication as well as not being maintained at their best therapeutic level.
June 9, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to keep resident rooms free from accident hazards for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #13, #19, #20) who were observed. The facility failed to follow smoking policy by Resident #13, Resident #19 and Resident #20 having smoking materials of lighters and cigarettes in rooms. This failure could place residents at risk of accident hazards.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure stored food was properly stored per food label. 2. The facility failed to practice proper hand sanitation while preparing food. Findings Included: Observation of shelved foods on 6/7/2023 at 10:00am revealed the following: 1. Plastic bottle labeled tartar sauce no expiration date noted ??? sitting on shelf with spice containers with a label on back indicated refrigerate after opening. Observation on 6/7/23 During an observation on 6/7/23 at 10:30 AM, observed [NAME] A preparing puree food. [NAME] A stopped prepping puree food, walked to trash can to discard a can, and returned to preparing puree food. [...]
  3. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for immunization records. The facility failed to ensure records regarding patient care, including bed rails, was accurate and complete. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for inaccurate records to ensure continuity of and appropriate care.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on August 7, 2025.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · August 7, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.503.393.86
Registered nurses0.410.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.032.983.42
Nurse aides2.15
Licensed practical nurses0.95
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)32.6%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.72 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.70 on weekdays and 3.03 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.62 in April to June 2025 to 3.50 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.500.413.703.03 0.4%0 of 9046
Oct to Dec 20253.350.283.512.94 0.0%0 of 9247
Jul to Sep 20253.560.373.743.11 0.0%0 of 9248
Apr to Jun 20253.620.423.872.99 0.0%0 of 9145
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: HHSC Approved NATCEP Providers, as of October 6, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.615.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.60.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.13.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.11.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.614.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.83.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
38.59.615.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.22.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.02.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

49.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

26.1% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

4.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: TERREL I INVESTMENTS, LLC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Terrel, AaronDirect ownership interestIndividual05/01/2014
Terrel, AudraDirect ownership interestIndividual05/01/2014
Llano Estacado Healthcare LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization05/01/2014
Terrel, AaronOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2014

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition"
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 7, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Hereford Nursing & Rehabilitation?
CMS lists 4 owners and managers. Legal business name: TERREL I INVESTMENTS, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection