Find a nursing home

Home / Washington / Gig Harbor

Heron's Key

4340 Borgen Blvd Nw, Gig Harbor, WA 98332 · Pierce County · (253) 313-0800

30 certified beds, about 16 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2018

CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 505531 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 13, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Washington average is 15.8, the national average 9.2).

None of its 18 health citations since January 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.75 hours per resident per day, against 4.36 across Washington and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.70 of those hours.

29.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Washington average 45.1%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
3E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
February 13, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess dental status for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 8) when reviewed for dental care. This failure placed the Resident at risk of pain, weight loss, and diminished quality of life.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality care related to monitoring of resident skin injuries (bruises), bowel management, and orthostatic blood pressure (blood pressure taken while a person is laying, sitting and standing to monitor for sudden drop in pressure) for 2 of 9 sampled residents (Residents 8 and 11) when reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of injuries, untreated constipation, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life.
  3. D
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    F790 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 3) when reviewed for dental needs. This failure placed the resident at risk for difficulty eating, dental pain, unintended weight loss, and diminished quality of life.
November 15, 2024Standard inspection · 12 citations
  1. F
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    F572 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to periodically inform residents of their rights after residents were admitted to the facility for 8 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 1, 3, 6, 9, 13, 14, 15 and 16) when reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their rights and a diminished quality of life.
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to sanitarily prepare food in the facility kitchen and failed to monitor resident refrigerators for 1 of 2 resident refrigerators (Front Refrigerator) when reviewed for kitchen. These failures placed residents at risk of consuming contaminated food, foodborne illness, and a diminished quality of life.
  3. E
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital to residents or responsible party for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for not knowing rights regarding transfer and discharge from the facility and diminished protection from being inappropriately discharged .
  4. E
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lacking knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital and diminished quality of life.
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    F559 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure married residents were provided the right to share a room for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 4) reviewed for room changes. This failure placed residents at risk for psychosocial stress and a diminished quality of life.
  6. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to determine if a resident had current advanced directives (AD), and if not, determine whether the resident wished to develop advanced directives for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 9) when reviewed for AD. This failure potentially denied the resident the opportunity to direct their healthcare if they were to become unable to make decisions or communicate their health care preferences.
  7. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan about post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that can develop after someone experiences or witnesses a traumatic event) for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 6) reviewed for care planning. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified and unmet care needs and diminished quality of life.
  8. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement the bowel program when needed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 15) reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures placed the residents at risk for discomfort and a diminished quality of life.
  9. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was maintained related to a reclining chair for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 14) and common area appliances were safe from resident use for 2 of 2 common area ovens (East and West) when reviewed for accidents. These failures placed residents at risk for avoidable injuries and a diminished quality of life.
  10. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed initiate non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed pain medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 14) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications and a diminished quality of life.
  11. D
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary piece of equipment was available to 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 6) reviewed for safe and sanitary environment/equipment. This failure placed the resident at risk for infection and diminished quality of life.
  12. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to post actual nurse staffing hours for 11 of 11 months reviewed (01/10/2024 through 11/14/2024) when reviewed for nurse staff posting. This failure placed residents and family at risk of not knowing the actual number of staff working within the facility.
January 8, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals at appropriate temperatures. This failure placed the residents at risk for food bourne illness, decreased satisfaction with meals and diminished quality of life.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to adequately monitor for adverse side effects of anticoagulant (blood thinning) medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 15 and 9) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified adverse side effects and a decreased quality of life.
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled, dated, or discarded in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 2 of 2 medication carts (1200 and 1300 carts) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving compromised or expired medications.

Fire safety inspections

18 fire safety citations on file: 7 on February 13, 2026, 4 on November 15, 2024, 7 on January 8, 2024.

Every fire safety citation18 citations
  1. F
    Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
    E 15 · February 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
    E 18 · February 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Provide emergency officials' contact information.
    E 31 · February 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · February 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · February 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
    K 781 · February 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · November 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · November 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · November 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · November 15, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. F
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · January 8, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · January 8, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · January 8, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · January 8, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 8, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. F
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · January 8, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. F
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · January 8, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWashingtonUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.754.363.86
Registered nurses1.700.940.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.363.803.42
Nurse aides3.35
Licensed practical nurses0.70
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)29.6%45.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover44.4%45.4%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.90 on weekdays and 5.36 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.11 in April to June 2025 to 5.75 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.751.705.905.36 0.0%0 of 9016
Oct to Dec 20254.871.725.074.37 0.0%0 of 9222
Jul to Sep 20255.041.325.194.66 0.0%0 of 9221
Apr to Jun 20255.111.775.314.62 0.0%0 of 9120
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Washington, Jan to Mar 20264.210.904.443.663.7%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Washington

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Washington, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$23.65$22.59 to $27.8530,270
LPNs and LVNs$39.98$36.98 to $45.186,780
Registered nurses$59.71$49.57 to $64.5469,260
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWashingtonUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.414.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.00.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.71.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.11.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.04.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.415.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.719.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.013.412.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Heron's Key's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

56.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Washington: 71 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Washington: 7 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Washington: 4 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Washington61.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Washington0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Washington1.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Washington98.3% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: HERONS KEY.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Herons Key5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/10/2013
Antonucci, JamesW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/01/2016
Ashley, JohnathanW-2 managing employeeIndividual10/17/2016
Kilcup, LeroyCorporate directorIndividual09/16/2016
King, GaryCorporate directorIndividual01/10/2013
Schneider, DaphneCorporate directorIndividual01/10/2013
Vanhorn, DannaCorporate directorIndividual01/10/2013
Antonucci, JamesCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2016
Chambard, AllanCorporate officerIndividual05/13/2015
Wallin, KayCorporate officerIndividual05/13/2015
Emerald CommunitiesOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/01/2015

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 15, 2024: "Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 15, 2024: "Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."

Other nursing homes nearby

Washington contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Washington. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Heron's Key's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Heron's Key 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Heron's Key get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 13, 2026. The Washington average is 15.8.
Has Heron's Key been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Heron's Key accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Heron's Key?
CMS lists 11 owners and managers. Legal business name: HERONS KEY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection