Hill Country Heights
810 Industrial Ave, Copperas Cove, TX 76522 · Coryell County · (254) 547-9552
96 certified beds, about 76 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675536 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 23 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,356 in the last three years; the largest was $12,356, and the latest is dated June 23, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.48 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
42.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Touchstone Communities, an affiliated group of 25 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
May 21, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure sanitation practices (ensuring trash receptacles were securely covered, ensuring kitchen floors were free from debris, ensuring kitchen utensils were free of dried debris, ensuring kitchen utility cart was debris free, and ensuring kitchen shelving was debris free)2. The facility failed to label and date all food items in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness. During an observation on 5/19/26 at 6:13 am, of the facility's kitchen revealed: [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 resident (Resident #20) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 received her divided plate and small 4 oz. cups with a straw at mealtimes and was included in her care plan. These failures could affect residents and put them at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Record review of Resident #20's face sheet dated 05/20/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility failed to ensure ADNS LVN used aseptic technique (a procedure that healthcare providers use to prevent the spread of germs that cause infection) during tracheostomy care and tracheostomy suctioning for Resident #7 by not performing hand hygiene, placing barriers, performing proper suction depth procedures or using sterile equipment during care on 05/20/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infections and respiratory distress.
- D Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide special eating equipment and cups with straws for resident who need them for 1 of 6 (Residents #20) residents reviewed for special eating equipment. The facility failed to provide Resident #20's physician ordered divided plate and 4 oz cup with straw with lid for drinking on 05/20/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by weight loss, diminished independence, and self-esteem. Record review of Resident #20's face sheet dated 05/20/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: [...]
December 8, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's health status (that is, a deterioration in health status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications), and need to alter treatment significantly for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to notify the wound care provider when Resident #1's sacral region continued to develop new areas of MASD from 07/08/2025 to 08/22/2025. This failure could result in decreased continuity of care, and a delay in the treatment and services needed.
March 20, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all assistive devices were maintained and free of hazards for four (Residents #13, #21, 48 and #221) of fifteen residents reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to properly maintain wheelchairs for Residents #13, #21, #48 and #221. These failures could place residents at risk for equipment that is in unsafe operating condition, which could cause injury.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 (MA A) staff members and 2 of 4 residents (Residents #47, and #221) reviewed for infection control procedures. MA A failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Residents #47 and #221. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections.
- C Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information for the third quarter (April 1, 2024, to June 30, 2024) reviewed for Administration. The facility failed to submit complete PBJ staffing information to CMS for April 1, 2024, to April 30, 2024. This failure could place all residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. Findings Included: Record review of the Casper3 PBJ report revealed the facility had four areas triggered on the FY Quarter 3 (April1- June30) report. The areas were One Star Staffing Rating, Excessively low Weekend Staffing, No Rn hours, and Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours/day. [...]
June 23, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards and received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for transfers in that: CNA A failed to provide adequate supervision and transfer assistance for Resident #1 in the shower resulting in Resident #1 falling and having an open right ankle fracture with bleeding. Resident #1 had to be hospitalized and required surgical intervention. The facility failed to update the Kardex and POC to reflect current safe transfer status requirements for Resident #1 and 12 other residents. The facility failed to ensure CNAs were knowledgeable on how to locate the Kardex to determine if 1 or 2 staff were required to safely transfer/assist a resident. An IJ was identified on 06/21/24. [...]
January 31, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews , the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for residents who consumed foods orally from the only kitchen in the facility in that: 1. The facility failed to provide palatable food that was attractive or appetizing to residents' who complained the food was unidentifiable and did not taste good. 2. The test tray of the lunch meal foods were dry, bland, and cold. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure dry storage food was properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure dry storage items were sealed properly. 3. The facility failed to properly label and date items in the refrigerator and freezer. 4. The facility failed to ensure expired food was discarded. 5. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff practiced proper hand hygiene and glove use. 6. The facility failed to ensure hairnets were worn while in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for two (Resident #3 and Resident #39) of six residents reviewed for rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 catheter bag was covered when out of room. 2. The facility failed to provide dignity and respect for Resident #39 by not aiding a resident that required assistance in dressing. These failures placed the residents at risk of a decline of their sense of dignity, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of the resident's admission that included instructions for providing effective person-centered care for the resident and met professional standards of quality of care for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 58) reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for Resident #58. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their immediate care needs met or not receiving continuity of care.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs for 3 (Resident # 3, 52 and 55) 16 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 3's Catheter was addressed on her care plan. 2. The Facility failed to ensure Resident # 52's care plan was updated by removing isolation when the resident no longer medically required it. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 55's Fluid restriction and noncompliance with restrictions was on the care plan. This failure placed the resident at risk for not having their individual needs met in a timely manner and communicated to provide and could result in injury and a decline in physical well-being.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident # 11 and Resident # 16) reviewed for quality of life. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's nails were trimmed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's nails were cleaned. These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident # 6 and Resident # 22) of 8 reviewed for Quality of care. The facility failed to maintain the drainage bag to Resident # 6's surgical wound in a position that it could drain. The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for finger sticks for Resident # 22 who was on sliding-scale insulin. These Failures could put the residents at risk for infection, and risk for medical decline.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 resident ( Resident # 57) of 8 reviewed for accurate weights. The facility failed to establish a consistent method of weighing residents to ensure the accuracy of weight. for 1 resident (Resident # 57) of 8 reviewed for accurate weights. This failure put the residents at risk for undetected weight loss, malnutrition, medical complications poor quality of life.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review , the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management (Resident #27), in that: RN C failed to assess and evaluate Resident# 27's existing pain and cause for pain in the administration of an opioid (narcotic). RN C failed to verify last administered dose of an opioid (narcotic) and available PRN pain medications putting the resident at risk for overmedication causing oversedation hypoxia oversedation respiratory failure. This failure placed Resident# 7 residents at risk for continued pain and adverse drug consequences. [...]
October 12, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for parenteral fluids. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN A and LVN B stopped administration of TPN (nutrition administered intravenously through a large vein near the heart) which could cause tissue damage, while performing a sterile dressing change for Resident #1. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 had their central lines maintained per professional standards, physician's order, or facility policy. These failures could place the residents with central lines at risk for serious infection, impaired nutrition, and hospitalization.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record revies, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing services to assure resident safety and maintain the highest practicable, physical, well-being of the resident for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of two residents and three (RN A, RN C, and LVN D) of four staff reviewed for competent nursing. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN A and LVN B stopped administration of TPN (nutrition administered intravenously through a large vein near the heart) which could cause tissue damage while performing a sterile dressing change for Resident #1. 2. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff (RN A, RN C, and LVN D) who cared for residents with central lines (Resident #1 and Resident #2) were competent in providing care following physician orders and facility policy. [...]
September 26, 2023Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet his or her preferences, goals, and address his or her medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for care plans in that: 1. Resident #1 did not have a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed her falls on 09/09/2023, 09/13/2023, and 09/24/2023. 2. Resident #2 had a comprehensive person-centered care plan that was started on 08/22/2023 with no completion date. These failures could place residents are risk of not having their preferences, goals, and needs met.
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care in that: Staff did not monitor, assess, and document neurological checks on Resident #1 after her falls on 09/09/2023, 09/13/2023, and 09/24/2023. This failure could place residents at risk of pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, physical harm, diminished quality of life, and death.
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accidents and hazards and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards in that: The facility failed to supervise Resident #1, who fell once on 09/09/2023, twice on 09/13/2023, and once on 09/24/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for further falls, pain, and/or injury.
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 21, 2026, 2 on January 31, 2024.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 23, 2024 | Fine | $12,356 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.48 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.05 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.27 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.76 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.1% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 22.2% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.24 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.65 on weekdays and 3.05 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.68 in April to June 2025 to 3.48 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.48 | 0.44 | 3.65 | 3.05 | 1.9% | 0 of 90 | 76 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.42 | 0.41 | 3.58 | 3.01 | 2.0% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.66 | 0.46 | 3.87 | 3.13 | 2.5% | 0 of 92 | 64 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.68 | 0.42 | 3.88 | 3.18 | 2.8% | 0 of 91 | 64 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.7 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: UVALDE COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Touchstone Communities, a group of 25 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apolinar, Adam | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2015 | |
| Contreras, Terri | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/29/2019 | |
| Touchstone Strategies - Copperas Cove, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| Tompkins, Jeffery | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/19/2025 | |
| Touchstone Strategies - Copperas Cove, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/12/2025 | |
| Oommen, Biju | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/26/2010 | |
| Tompkins, Jeffery | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/17/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2025: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Copperas Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Copperas Cove, 0.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Avir at Killeen Killeen, 9.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 48 citations
- Rosewood Heights Killeen, 10.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Harker Heights Nursing & Rehabilitation Harker Heights, 14.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 51 citations
- Lily Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Lampasas, 17 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Caraday of Lampasas Lampasas, 17.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Lampasas Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Lampasas, 17.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Coryell Health Rehabliving at the Meadows Gatesville, 22.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Hill Country Heights's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Hill Country Heights 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Hill Country Heights get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 21, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Hill Country Heights been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,356 in the last three years.
- Does Hill Country Heights accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Hill Country Heights?
- CMS lists 7 owners and managers, and links the home to Touchstone Communities. Legal business name: UVALDE COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.