Home / Florida / New Port Richey
6020 Indiana Ave, New Port Richey, FL 34653 · Pasco County · (727) 843-0600
119 certified beds, about 111 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1968
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105166 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 18, 2024, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 18 health citations since February 2020, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $33,413 in the last three years; the largest was $33,413, and the latest is dated April 18, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.65 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.49 of those hours.
35.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Fl SNF Trust, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#210 and #211), assisted with care by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was free from verbal/psychosocial abuse. out of twelve residents sampled for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four dependent residents (#45, #43, #69, and #72) were provided with activities out of ten residents sampled. Findings Include: Multiple observations were made on 4/15/2024 at 10:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m., showing Resident #45 laying down in his bed dressed in a red shirt and newspapers spread out all over his bed. Resident # 45 was not able to communicate his needs. During an observation made on 04/16/204 at 10:30 a.m., and at 3:00 p.m., and on 4/17/2024 at 11:00 a.m. Resident #45 was observed laying down in his bed, dressed in the same red shirt for 3 days in a row. The same newspapers were observed for 3 days spread out all over his bed. Resident # 45 was not able to communicate his needs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, and the facility policy review, and the Plan of Correction review, the facility failed to ensure that it had a functioning Quality Assurance Committee. The facility was actively involved in the effective creation, implementation and monitoring of the plan of correction for deficient practice during a relicensure and complaint survey that was conducted on 4/15 - 4/18/24 and was cited at F880. On 6/11/24 a revisit survey was conducted, and the facility was recited at F880. The facility had developed a Plan of Correction with a completion date of 5/18/22. During the revisit survey the facility failed to 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control program was implemented related to 1) the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for two of three designated transmission based precaution (TBP) rooms, 2) no hand hygiene provided to residents prior to meals for four of four hallways, and 3) the Infection Preventionist (IP) conducting appropriate surveillance for influenza.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility 1) failed to provide access to quality care related to a dignified meal service for three residents (# 69, #43, and #89) out of 13 residents reviewed for dining, and 2) failed to ensure a catheter was stored in a privacy bag for one resident (#43) out of 29 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a grievance was filed related to a resident's room changed for one resident (#87), out of eight residents sampled. Findings Include: During an observation made on 04/15/2024 at 10:45 AM., Resident #87 was observed laying down in her bed with her call light within reach. The Resident said she would like to have a room change because she doesn't get along with her roommate. She said she spoke to the Social Services Assistant multiple times about wanting to move to another room, but nothing has been done about it. During an observation made on 04/16/2024 at 12:00 PM., Resident #87 was observed sitting up in her wheelchair with a blanket placed over her lap. She stated she and her roommate got into a verbal fight last night and she really wants her room to change. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal/psychosocial abuse for two residents (#210 and #211) out of twelve residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to ensure Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provided to one resident (#45) out of ten residents sampled. Finding Include: On 4/15/2024 at 10:30 AM., Resident #45 was observed laying down in his bed dressed in a red shirt and newspapers spread out all over his bed. Resident #45 was not able to communicate his needs. On 04/16/204 and 4/17/2024, at 11:00 AM., Resident #45 was observed laying down in his bed, dressed in the same red shirt for 3 days in a row. The same newspapers were observed for 3 days spread out all over his bed. Resident #45 was not able to communicate his needs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper orders and documentation were in the medical record for two residents (#10 and #255) out of twenty-nine sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure foot care was provided when needed for one resident (#69) out of one residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not accommodate dietary preferences related to alternate meal requests for four residents (#351, #18, #352, and #86) out of 13 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #250) of twenty residents receiving respiratory (nebulizer) medication was assessed and monitored for self-administration of a respiratory nebulizer treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary living environment was provided during three (11/02/21, 11/03/21 and 11/04/21) of four days observed, and for two (#39 and #84) of two residents in room [ROOM NUMBER].
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive, accurate assessment for one (#20) of 50 sampled residents related to skin conditions which included discolorations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise the Comprehensive Patient Centered Care Plan related to smoking based on the resident's assessment for one (#19) of three sampled residents of 15 total smokers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident record review, staff and resident interview and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that three residents (#7, #13 and #62) of 15 residents who smoke were free from smoking hazards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor for behaviors, effects and side effects related to psychotropic medications for one resident (#5) of five sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow infection control practices related to adequately cleaning blood glucose meters for two residents (#7 and #99) of two residents observed for glucose monitoring.
9 fire safety citations on file: 7 on April 18, 2024, 1 on November 5, 2021, 1 on February 14, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 18, 2024 | Fine | $33,413 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.65 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.49 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.38 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.29 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.88 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.1% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.8% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.78 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.76 on weekdays and 3.38 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.51 in April to June 2025 to 3.65 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.49 | 3.76 | 3.38 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 111 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.55 | 0.42 | 3.64 | 3.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 113 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.55 | 0.43 | 3.65 | 3.28 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 115 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.51 | 0.43 | 3.59 | 3.31 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 111 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.1 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.2 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.6 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Madison Pointe Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 253 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 243 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 161 eligible stays.
80.5% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 200 residents counted.
0.4% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 272 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 272 residents counted.
97.8% this home
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MADISON POINTE NURSING AND REHAB LLC. CMS links this home to Fl SNF Trust, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Pointe Nursing Holdco | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 08/01/2023 |
| Fl Master Opco Holdco II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2023 | |
| Fl SNF Trust I | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2023 | |
| Fl SNF Trust II | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2023 | |
| Snyder, Chasmin | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Garfinkel, Allan | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.