Home / North Dakota / Langdon
Maple Manor Care Center
1116 9th Ave, Langdon, ND 58249 · Cavalier County · (701) 256-2987
45 certified beds, about 36 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355050 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 10, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $31,694 in the last three years; the largest was $31,694, and the latest is dated September 9, 2025.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
September 10, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- G Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of professional reference, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and provide an effective pain management regimen to meet resident needs for 2 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #4 and #5) reviewed for pain management. Failure to develop, implement, and provide an effective pain management plan resulted in unresolved pain and discomfort and decreased quality of life.
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of a facility job description and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 dietary manager (#11) obtained the proper qualifications to serve as the dietary manager. Failure to ensure staff have the qualifications to carry out the functions of a manager in the dietary department has the potential to result in foodborne illness to residents, staff, and visitors.
- F Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (physician) actively participated on the Quality Assurance (QA) committee for 3 of 4 quarters (July-September 2024, October-December 2024, and April-June 2025). Failure to ensure the medical director participates in the facility's QA activities deprived the committee of the physician's unique contribution for analyzing and correcting problems with identified resident care areas.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and review of facility policy, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in 1 of 2 dining rooms (north dining room). Failure to ensure no bare-hand contact with ready-to-eat food has the potential to result in a food borne illness.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 14 sampled residents (Residents #4 and #5) observed during personal cares. Failure to practice infection control standards during medication administration and resident cares has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect the current status for 3 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #3, #11, and #32). Failure to review and revise the care plan as the needs change for the resident limited the ability of staff to communicate care needs and ensure continuity of care for each resident.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #3 and #5) observed during medication pass. Failure to disinfect the rubber seal of insulin pens increases the risk of infection to residents and failure to follow manufacturer instructions for eye drop administration may impede the effectiveness of the eye drops.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #29) with contractures received the necessary devices. Failure to consistently provide a rolled washcloth to the resident's right hand may result in worsening of the contracture, pain, and further skin breakdown.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to properly utilize assistive devices for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #16) reviewed for falls. Failure to properly use a bed and chair alarm placed the resident at risk for falls.
July 10, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve foods at palatable temperatures on 2 of 3 days of survey (July 8-9, 2024). Failure to serve foods at a temperature acceptable to residents may result in decreased intake, weight loss, and inadequate nutrition.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in 1 of 1 main kitchen. Failure to apply an identifying label to food and add an open date has the potential to affect food quality/preparation and may result in the spread of foodborne illness to residents, staff, and visitors.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, confidential interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide resident care for 2 of 11 sampled residents (Resident #8 and #14) requiring assistance with activities of daily living in a manner that promotes, maintains, or enhances their quality of life. Failure to cover a urinary catheter leg bag (Resident #8) and failure to clean and shave resident's face and change the soiled shirt (Resident #14) has the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well being and personal dignity.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wrote1. Based on record review, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #15) reviewed with orders for specific parameters for blood glucose levels. Failure to notify the physician of high blood glucose levels as ordered placed the resident at risk for delayed treatment and adverse health events.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of professional reference, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #33) observed during a gait belt transfer. Failure to provide supervision of certified nurse aides (CNAs) by a licensed nurse regarding resident transfer assistance may result in unnecessary pain, falls and/or injury for residents.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of a professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #33) who required staff assistance with toileting. Failure to provide toileting may result in a loss of dignity and placed the resident at risk for skin breakdown, poor grooming/hygiene, decreased self-esteem, urinary tract infections, and risk for fall and/or injuries.
August 9, 2023Standard inspection · 9 citations
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Medicare Part A letters/notices, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) form and Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) form two days in advance of discharge for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #23 and #38) discharged from Medicare Part A services. Failure to provide Medicare Part A letters/notices within the required time frame has the potential to limit the residents' right to an expedited review of service termination (NOMNC) and/or to exercise their rights to Medicare Part A services (SNFABN).
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or their representative and/or the State Long Term Care Ombudsman written notice of transfer for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #30) with a recent hospital transfer. Failure to provide a written copy of the transfer notice does not allow the resident and/or their representative to make an informed decision regarding their rights or inform the Ombudsman of the transfer.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.17.1), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #8 and #9). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the North Dakota Provider Manual for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) and Level of Care Screening Procedures for Long Term Care Services, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a status change assessment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #28) with a newly diagnosed mental illness. Failure to complete a change in status assessment may result in the delivery of care and services that are inconsistent with residents' needs.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current status for 3 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #8, #17, and #35). Failure to review and revise the care plan limited staffs' ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist reported drug regimen irregularities for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #18 and #25) selected for drug regimen review. Failure to report drug regimen irregularities and act upon recommendations may result in residents receiving unnecessary medications and experiencing adverse consequences related to their use.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication regimen free from unnecessary medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #18 and #25) selected for medication regimen review. Failure to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) or identify contraindications for a GDR may result in residents receiving unnecessary medications and experiencing adverse consequences related to their use.
- D Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure participation by the medical director for 1 of 3 quarterly meetings (May 9, 2023) reviewed.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteHAND HYGIENE 1. Based on observation, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #24) observed while receiving toileting assistance. Failure to follow infection control practices regarding hand hygiene during cares has the potential for transmission of communicable diseases and infections to residents, staff, and visitors.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 9, 2025 | Fine | $31,694 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | not reported | 4.42 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | not reported | 0.93 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | not reported | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | not reported | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | not reported | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 48.8% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS note on this home's staffing data: This facility did not submit staffing data.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In July to September 2025, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.88 on weekdays and 3.19 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 16% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.5% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.04 in April to June 2025 to 3.69 in July to September 2025.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.69 | 0.84 | 3.88 | 3.19 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.04 | 0.88 | 4.19 | 3.68 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 35 |
| United States, Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.77 | 0.62 | 3.95 | 3.33 | 5.5% | 0.6% of days | |
| North Dakota, Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.55 | 0.90 | 4.80 | 3.92 | 12.6% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Dakota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.9 | 19.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 5.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.0 | 17.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 35.2 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MAPLE MANOR CARE CENTER.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan, Charles | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2014 | |
| Bunn, Dawn | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Bunn, Dawn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Close, Tammy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/29/2025 | |
| Jordan, Charles | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2014 | |
| Jordan, Charles | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 10, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Pembilier Nursing Center Walhalla, 23.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 9 citations
North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: North Dakota Health and Human Services, Health Facilities Unit, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: North Dakota Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, (855) 462-5465. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: North Dakota Deficiency Statement Search, where North Dakota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Maple Manor Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Maple Manor Care Center 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Maple Manor Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 10, 2025. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
- Has Maple Manor Care Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $31,694 in the last three years.
- Does Maple Manor Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Maple Manor Care Center?
- CMS lists 6 owners and managers. Legal business name: MAPLE MANOR CARE CENTER.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.