418 Floyde Street, McCall, ID 83638 · Valley County · (208) 634-2112
65 certified beds, about 32 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1981
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 135082 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 24, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Idaho average is 10.3, the national average 9.2).
None of its 9 health citations since July 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.23 hours per resident per day, against 4.04 across Idaho and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.
60.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Idaho average 50.3%).
CMS links it to The Ensign Group, an affiliated group of 344 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 9 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and observation it was determined the facility failed to ensure a qualified individual was employed with the knowledge and skill set to carry out the function of food and nutrition services. This deficient practice created the potential to affect 35 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for undetected weight loss and adverse health outcomes when the facility did not employ a qualified individual to meet all resident nutritional needs.
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled:Number of residents cited:SDP= GenesisUniverse= Facility wide Concerns with Food and Nutrition Services regarding kitchen sanitation. Based on observation, staff interview, and Food Code review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was maintained in sanitary condition and food was handled in a safe and sanitary manner. These deficient practices created the potential to affect 35 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential food contamination and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were performed after unwitnessed falls and/or incidents involving a potential head injury, and medications were administered consistent with physician orders. This was true for 5 of 5 residents (#5, #19, #21, #22, and #27) reviewed for falls, and 1 of 8 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for medication administration. These failures created the potential for harm should residents experience undetected changes in neurological status and adverse effects from medications that were administered contrary to physician orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident or the resident's representative received information and assistance to exercise their right to formulate an Advance Directive. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for an Advance Directive. The deficient practice created the potential for harm should resident's wishes regarding end of life or emergent care not be honored when they were incapacitated.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified in a timely manner of a resident's significant change in condition which required hospitalization. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for notification of changes. This placed the resident at risk of inappropriate care and treatment due to lack of advocacy and involvement by their representative.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was documented on their baseline care plan. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #130) reviewed for baseline care plans. This failure created the potential for harm should a residents' wishes not be followed regarding their code status due to lack of information on the baseline care plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and resident, resident family member, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised and updated as care needs changed. This was true for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #13) whose care plans were reviewed. This failure created the potential for harm if cares and/or services were provided based on inaccurate information on the care plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide showers and communication assistance as needed. This was true for 2 of 12 residents (#13 and #18) whose activities of daily living were reviewed. This failure placed the residents at risk of psychosocial distress related to embarrassment and/or isolation from not receiving showers and not being able to communicate.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received restorative services through the restorative nursing program as needed. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#9 and #13) reviewed for the restorative nursing program. This failure created the potential for residents to experience a decline in Range of Motion (ROM).
2 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 24, 2025, 1 on July 26, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Idaho | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.23 | 4.04 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.94 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.05 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.41 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.0% | 50.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 40.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 2.94 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.35 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.36 in April to June 2025 to 3.23 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.23 | 0.78 | 3.35 | 2.94 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 32 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.08 | 0.63 | 3.22 | 2.73 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 37 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.14 | 0.74 | 3.32 | 2.68 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 35 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.36 | 0.83 | 3.60 | 2.73 | 9.5% | 1 of 91 | 34 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Idaho, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.90 | 0.80 | 4.11 | 3.37 | 4.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.58 | $17.45 to $22.23 | 7,910 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.67 | $28.04 to $35.60 | 1,880 |
| Registered nurses | $44.45 | $38.90 to $49.19 | 16,880 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Idaho | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.1 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.4 | 16.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.4 | 20.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.7 | 17.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.9 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for McCall Rehabilitation and Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
54.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Idaho: 18 better, 3 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.
9.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Idaho: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
6.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Idaho: 1 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
75.0% this home
Median of homes: Idaho62.2% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Idaho0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Idaho1.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Idaho98.1% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MCCALL HEALTHCARE, LLC. CMS links this home to The Ensign Group, a group of 344 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pennant Healthcare, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/30/2021 |
| Allen, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | Corporate director | Individual | 05/30/2019 | |
| Burnam, Soon | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/17/2018 | |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Hawkins, Isaiah | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/09/2024 | |
| Sato, Ami | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/09/2024 | |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Floyde Health Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Standard Bearer Healthcare Op LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| The Ensign Group Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Allen, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/08/2025 | |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/08/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Idaho. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.