Find a nursing home

Home / Kansas / Meade

Meade District Hosp Ltcu Dba Lone Tree Retirement

801 E Grant, Meade, KS 67864 · Meade County · (620) 873-2146

45 certified beds, about 31 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicaid since 1981

Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 17E026 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 21, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 18 health citations since November 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.73 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.92 of those hours.

39.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
3E
5F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
2C
August 21, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 33 residents, and one main kitchen. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illnesses.
  2. F
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of kitchen garbage and refuse properly. This placed facility residents at risk for insect or rodent infestation.
  3. F
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    F882 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP), who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, to be responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). This failure has the potential to affect all 33 residents.
  4. E
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for five residents: Resident (R) 7, and R4 related to personal alarms; R5 related to pressure ulcers and medications; R2 related to dental; and R25 related to nutrition. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified care needs.
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing direct care to a Resident (R) 5 with a Stage 3 (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) pressure injury. The facility further failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during personal care for R5 and R32 when staff failed to complete adequate hand hygiene. The facility failed to deliver food in a sanitary manner for several residents in the dining room. These deficient practices had the potential to spread infections to the residents in the facility.
  6. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner when Resident (R)4 received care without privacy. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and embarrassment.
  7. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 33 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a written discharge summary or recapitulation of the stay for Resident (R) 37. This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights related to continuity of care.
  8. C
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 33 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the Payroll-Based Journaling (PBJ) as required.
June 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 32 residents, with three residents reviewed for risk of elopement (an incident in which a cognitively impaired resident with poor or impaired decision-making ability/safety awareness leaves the facility without the knowledge of staff). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment as free of accident hazards as possible, to prevent the elopement of cognitively impaired and independently mobile Resident (R)2, who the facility identified as an elopement risk. On 05/25/24 R2 displayed an increase in his wandering/exit seeking behavior which included statements he was going to leave, and he attempted to push open the front. On 05/26/24 R2 pushed on the doors leading to the apartments, displayed agitation, and thought the facility was a jail. [...]
August 30, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 27 residents with one central kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store foods safely and ensure proper sanitization and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illnesses for the residents of the facility.
  2. F
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 27 residents with all residents receiving meals from the one main kitchen. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in good working condition by the failure to have a functioning dish machine since 08/08/23. This failure has made it necessary to manually wash all dishes used in the kitchen and for residents with questionable sanitization. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.
  3. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility has a census of 27 with 12 residents included in the sample, two reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice regarding the use of nebulizer (a device that delivers medication as a mist to the lungs) for Resident (R) 26, and R27.
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 27 with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment by the failure to clean the nebulizer equipment between uses for Resident (R)26, R27 and on R16 failed to provide proper hand hygiene during incontinent care.
  5. C
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 27 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) when the facility failed to submit staffing hour data for all nursing personnel by the required deadline.
November 16, 2021Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 11, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 33 residents, with 12 in the sample, and four reviewed for oxygen/respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change oxygen tubing and nebulizer tubing routinely and failed to ensure the nebulizer and oxygen tubing were stored sanitarily for Resident (R)9, R28, R17, and R25.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 11, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 33, with 12 residents in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 6 was treated with dignity when they did not provide a privacy bag for an indwelling catheter bag.
  3. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 11, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 33 residents, with 12 included in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 26 or the resident representative with a bed-hold policy upon transfer to a hospital.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 11, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 33 residents, with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise care plans for Resident (R) 9 and R28 in include care of the oxygen both residents were receiving.

Fire safety inspections

16 fire safety citations on file: 7 on August 21, 2025, 7 on August 30, 2023, 2 on November 16, 2021.

Every fire safety citation16 citations
  1. F
    Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
    K 343 · August 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · August 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · August 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · August 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · August 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · August 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Ensure that smoke control systems are tested and documented in accordance with established engineering principles.
    K 771 · August 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. F
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · November 16, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · November 16, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeKansasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.734.073.86
Registered nurses0.920.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.313.603.42
Nurse aides3.71
Licensed practical nurses0.11
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)39.6%48.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover16.7%42.0%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.02 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.91 on weekdays and 4.31 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 33.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.50 in April to June 2025 to 4.73 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.730.924.914.31 33.1%0 of 9031
Oct to Dec 20254.760.974.954.26 24.0%0 of 9231
Jul to Sep 20254.600.904.824.03 20.7%0 of 9233
Apr to Jun 20254.500.874.743.91 21.3%0 of 9136
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Kansas, Jan to Mar 20264.010.674.193.564.8%0.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Kansas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Kansas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.27$17.41 to $21.2424,610
LPNs and LVNs$29.69$27.05 to $33.407,530
Registered nurses$38.14$35.24 to $45.5333,800
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeKansasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.417.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.52.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.34.33.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.816.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.34.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.918.115.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.72.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Meade District Hosp Ltcu Dba Lone Tree Retirement's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

CMS reports none of these results for this home: This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ownership data not available

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2024: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Common questions

What is Meade District Hosp Ltcu Dba Lone Tree Retirement's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Meade District Hosp Ltcu Dba Lone Tree Retirement 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Meade District Hosp Ltcu Dba Lone Tree Retirement get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 21, 2025. The Kansas average is 9.5.
Has Meade District Hosp Ltcu Dba Lone Tree Retirement been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Meade District Hosp Ltcu Dba Lone Tree Retirement accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Meade District Hosp Ltcu Dba Lone Tree Retirement?
CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection