Bethel Home
300 S Aztec St., Montezuma, KS 67867 · Gray County · (620) 846-2241
56 certified beds, about 54 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 2012
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175528 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 16, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 14 health citations since March 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.58 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
28.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
January 16, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 50 residents and the sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the fall care plan with an appropriate intervention for two residents. Resident (R) R33 and R36. Additionally, the facility failed to update care plan with facility acquired pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for R2, and R23's care plan was not updated with psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications changes. These deficient practices had the potential to have a negative effect on the overall physical and psychosocial well-being of the residents in the facility.
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 50 residents and the sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for four residents. Resident (R) 37 who had medications located in her room that was not secured. Additionally, three residents R21, R33, and R36 had repeated falls with inappropriate or lacked a care plan revision after falls. These failures placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and related injuries.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 50 residents. The sample included 14 residents reviewed for person-centered care plan development. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for three residents, Resident (R) 33 related to psychotropic (any class of medications that alter mood or thought) medication use and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care. R21's care plan lacked interventions related to as needed (PRN) oxygen use and scheduled nebulized (a device which changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) medication use. [...]
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 50 residents with 14 residents sampled, which included one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to perform an ongoing assessment of a stage three (full thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) facility acquired pressure ulcer for Resident (R) 2.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 50 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)46's as needed (PRN) psychotropic (any class of medications that alters mood or thought) medication had the required 14 day stop date or clinical rationale for continued use beyond the initial 14 days. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to the resident receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings Included: - R46's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), insomnia (inability to sleep), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 50 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, staff failed to complete proper hand hygiend during wound care for Resident (R)2 and R21, to ensure best practice regarding infection control and prevention.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 50 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an effective and ongoing antibiotic stewardship for appropriate antibiotic use for the residents of the facility to prevent antibiotic resistance and the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms
February 1, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 54, with 4 sampled for pressure injuries. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain a system to identify, track, and measure wounds when Residents (R) 51 admitted to the facility with two pressure injuries (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) and had multiple wounds develop with no measurements, description, or follow up documented in the resident's record. [...]
- F Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 54 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the competency of Licensed Nurses in the facility regarding wound/skin issues of residents to include the monitoring, measuring, identifying of skin issues and pressure injuries (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). This deficient practice placed any resident with potential skin issues, at risk of worsening and further development of skin related injuries. (See F610, F655, F684, F686)
- F Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 54 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the QAPI committee developed and implemented timely action plans to address the quality deficiencies as identified in the annual health resurvey. This failure placed all resident with actual and/or potential skin integrity issues at risk.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 54, with one resident sampled for an injury of unknown origin. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate an investigation, when Resident (R) 51 sustained bruising to his left wrist, right forearm, and a skin tear to the back of his right hand with no documentation or follow to determine the origin of the resident's injuries. The facility further failed to place interventions/protections, to ensure the resident did not sustain further injuries.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 54, with 4 sampled for pressure injuries. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for Resident (R) 54, which included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident and met professional standards of quality care, when the resident developed a deep tissue injury to the left heel with no documentation or interventions in place on the resident's baseline care plan.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteThe facility census totaled 54, with one resident sampled for non-pressure related skin conditions. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify, document, track, and measure skin issues when Resident (R) 23 had multiple skin tears, bruising and surgical removal of a cancerous lesion on the ear and had no measurements, description or follow up documented in the R23's record.
March 24, 2021Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 52 residents, with 11 included in the sample, and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of insulin (a hormone produced in the pancreas) when staff failed to report out of parameter blood glucose (main sugar that the body makes from the food in the diet) levels for Resident (R) 45, per physician's orders.
Fire safety inspections
11 fire safety citations on file: 9 on January 16, 2025, 2 on February 1, 2023.
Every fire safety citation11 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.58 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.00 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.35 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.68 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 28.6% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 16.7% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 2.74 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.82 on weekdays and 4.00 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.58 in April to June 2025 to 4.58 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.58 | 0.55 | 4.82 | 4.00 | 1.3% | 0 of 90 | 54 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.38 | 0.51 | 4.59 | 3.87 | 2.5% | 0 of 92 | 56 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.57 | 0.51 | 4.80 | 4.01 | 2.0% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.58 | 0.56 | 4.88 | 3.80 | 1.6% | 0 of 91 | 54 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Kansas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.4 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.0 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Short-term rehab results
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Bethel Home's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
CMS reports none of these results for this home: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Owners and operators
Legal business name: BETHEL HOME INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isaac, Travis | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Johnson, Lance | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Koehn, Don | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Koehn, Lennis | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Koehn, Presley | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Nickel, Brenton | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Schowengerdt, Andrew | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/1991 | |
| Unruh, Brandon | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Unruh, David | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Yost, Chris | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Ensz, Terry | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Koehn, Eugene | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Smith, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Koehn, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/13/2018 | |
| Schowengerdt, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/1991 | |
| Koehn, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/13/2018 | |
| Schowengerdt, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/1991 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 16, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 16, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 16, 2025: "Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 16, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Shepherd's Center Cimarron, 16.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Fowler Residential Care Fowler, 20 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Meade District Hosp Ltcu Dba Lone Tree Retirement Meade, 22 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Sunporch of Dodge City Dodge City, 24.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 16 citations
Common questions
- What is Bethel Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Bethel Home 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Bethel Home get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 16, 2025. The Kansas average is 9.5.
- Has Bethel Home been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Bethel Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Bethel Home?
- CMS lists 17 owners and managers. Legal business name: BETHEL HOME INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.