510 Buckeye Ave, Sidney, OH 45365 · Shelby County · (937) 492-3171
51 certified beds, about 43 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366033 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 17, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 25 health citations since May 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.83 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.42 of those hours.
57.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide speech therapy as ordered. This affected two (#129 and #130) of three residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility weekly menus, the facility failed to ensure sufficient supply of coffee was available for residents as per the facility menu and failed to ensure menus were available for resident review. This had the potential to affect 38 out of 38 residents who receive meals from the kitchen, the facility identified one (#13) who does not receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 39.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of camera footage, review of facility investigation, and review of facility in-services, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper infection control practices. This affected one (#01) of three residents reviewed for infection control. This had the potential to affect six additional residents (#04, #08, #11, #21, #29, and #39) identified as being in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility census was 40.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure handwashing or sanitizing was completed between dirty to clean surfaces. This affected six (#39, #5, #23, #41, #28 and #37) out of six residents reviewed for handwashing. The census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure shaving was completed when the resident had long hairs under her arms and on her legs. This affected one (#39) of one reviewed for dignity and respect. The census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure reporting to the state agency was completed when an allegation of abuse was made by a resident. This affected one (#39) of one resident reviewed for reporting an allegation of abuse to the state agency. The census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an investigation into an allegation of abuse was completed. This affected one (#39) of one resident reviewed allegation of abuse. The census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, medical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was changed in a timely manner. This affected one (#39) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure fluid restriction was followed. The affected one (#33) of three residents reviewed for fluid restriction. The census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and food was stored in a safe manner. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents who received food from the kitchen with the exception of one (#05) resident who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth from the kitchen. The census was 39.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of the online verification system of the Board of Executives of Long-Term Services and Supports (BELTSS), review of the Administrator job description, staff interview, and facility corrective action, the facility failed to ensure there was a licensed nursing home administrator (LNHA) with a valid license providing supervision and leadership to the facility. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 39 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) attendance logs, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility Medical Director or designee attended QAPI meetings quarterly as required. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 39.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User Manual, the facility failed to ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed within required timeframes. This affected three (#2, #9, and #26) of 12 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 39.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User Manual, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted to CMS as required. This affected one (#94) of 12 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 39.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders to ensure treatments were in place. This affected one (#9) of one residents reviewed for treatment of skin conditions. The facility census was 39.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory testing as ordered by the physician. This affected three (#11, #26, and #28) of three residents reviewed for laboratory values. The facility census was 39.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed appropriately perform hand hygiene to maintain proper infection control practices during dressing changes. This affected one (#12) of one residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 39.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, medical record review, review of video surveillance, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure gloves were worn during resident care. This affected one (#27) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 45.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of dishwasher logs, and review of the facility Dish Machine Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was operating correctly. This had the potential to effect all 41 residents who recieved food from the kitchen. Resident #2 did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately removed personal protective equipment (PPE) when exiting the room of a resident under transmission precautions (TBP). This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for TBP and had the ability to affect 15 residents (#1, #2, #6, #12, #13, #16, #18, #19, #20, #22, #28, #37, #38, #43, and #195) residing on the 200 hall. The census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three (#29, #33, and #34) of 12 residents in the survey sample. The census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR)was completed. This effected one (#7) of two residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility census was 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective Legionella Control procedure. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to reflect residents medications used. This affected five (Resident #11, #14, #25 #32 and 36) of 12 residents records reviewed. The facility census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans addressed all resident care areas. This affected one resident (#24) of 11 reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 46.
18 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 20, 2026, 10 on October 17, 2024, 2 on February 24, 2022, 2 on May 9, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.83 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.42 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.43 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.47 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.95 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.1% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 70.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.33 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.99 on weekdays and 3.43 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.18 in April to June 2025 to 3.83 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.83 | 0.42 | 3.99 | 3.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 43 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.42 | 0.46 | 3.53 | 3.14 | 0.0% | 3 of 92 | 40 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.05 | 0.50 | 3.17 | 2.74 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 43 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.18 | 0.83 | 3.31 | 2.84 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 42 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Momentous Health at Sidney's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.
9.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SIDNEY REHAB LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stein, Mark | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 05/01/2022 |
| Tenenbaum, Michael | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 05/01/2022 |
| Stein, Mark | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Tenenbaum, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Walter, Mandy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/15/2024 | |
| Stein, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Tenenbaum, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2022 | |
| Topalov, Miguel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Walter, Mandy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/15/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.