Home / Minnesota / New Richland
New Richland Care Center
312 Northeast 1st Street, New Richland, MN 56072 · Waseca County · (507) 465-3292
45 certified beds, about 35 residents a day · Government - City · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245316 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 31, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 21 health citations since November 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $79,694 in the last three years; the largest was $79,694, and the latest is dated November 18, 2024.
79.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
March 31, 2026Standard inspection · 0 citations
June 5, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered dressing changes and assess wounds during those dressing changes, monitor for signs and symptoms of a worsening known infection, notify the physician of a change of condition and the need to acquire antibiotics from the E-Kit, acquire needed dressing change supplies, follow professional standards of practice by dating wound dressings and educate staff on identifying early signs and symptoms of sepsis (life-threatening infection) for 3 of 3 resident (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed.
February 19, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- F Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan to guide facility efforts in assuring care and services were maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the facility.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance was followed for fit testing for N95 filtering facepiece respirators prior to use and annually.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess the ability to safely operate power lift reclining chair and develop and implement policies and procedures related to the operation/use of power lift chairs for 1 of 1 (R137) resident reviewed for accidents. R137's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], no cognitive impairment, utilized a wheelchair, dependent on staff for toileting, lower body dressing, toilet transfer, sit to stand, chair transfer; required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene, roll left to right, sit to lying and diagnoses included need for assistance with personal care, obesity, and surgery on the digestive system. [...]
- C Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure most recent survey results were readily accessible for residents or visitors to view. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility and visitors.
January 8, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor for signs/ symptoms of fluid overload and evaluate the effectiveness of physician prescribed treatments for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who had diagnosis of congestive heart failure.
November 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- K Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to have a system in place for pressure ulcer prevention and management that included comprehensive assessments, monitoring, physician involvement, and individualized wound treatments and interventions for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) who had ongoing, recurrent, and deteriorating pressure wounds. As a result of the facility's systemic failure, R1 developed a stage 4 pressure ulcer that resulted in sepsis, osteomyelitis, and death resulting in immediate jeopardy. The IJ began on [DATE], when the facility failed to monitor, assess, and immediately notify the physician when R1's wound had increased drainage and pain which resulted in delay of care for four days followed by hospitalization and death. The Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of the IJ on [DATE] at 5:30 p.m. The IJ was removed on [DATE] at 4:39 p.m. [...]
- F Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement/Quality Assurance Activity (QAPI/QAA) that was effective in identifying, assessing, performing, developing, and implementing appropriate plans of action related to impaired skin integrity and/or pressure injuries. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 34 residents currently residing in the facility.
- E Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the physician and family/resident representative of new/existing wounds for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for pressure injuries.
- E Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 licensed nursing staff were trained and competent in pressure ulcer assessment and management. This had the potential to affect all residents who were at risk for pressure ulcers and/or residents with existing pressure ulcers.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) was used for 3 of 3 (R2, R3, R5) residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning of vital sign equipment for 2 of 2 (R5, R6) residents and failed to ensure handwashing/hand hygiene was implemented for 5 of 7 (R2, R3, R5, R7, R8) residents observed for handwashing/hand hygiene.
September 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse/neglect were reported to the State Agency (SA), in accordance with established policies and procedures, for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R5) reviewed for allegations of abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate following an allegation of staff to resident abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for allegation of abuse.
January 24, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R1) was treated with respect, dignity, and provided with self-determination in choosing bedtime.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported immediately, within two hours, to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for allegations of abuse.
- C Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop written policy and procedure for the time frame in which allegations of abuse and neglect must be reported to the State Agency (SA).
November 15, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that in the absence of a full-time registered dietician (RD), the dietary manager (DM) was certified to oversee nutrition and food services. This had potential to affect all 36 residents who resided in the facility.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure condiments were used or discarded in a timely manager to maintain freshness and quality. In addition, the facility failed to monitor and ensure water temperature in the 3-compartment sink met regulatory requirements. This had the potential to affect all 36 residents who were served food from the kitchen.
- F Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to have evidence of a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) which focused on high risk or problem-prone areas, identified thorough and appropriate data collection, analysis and evaluation of the identified concern(s) during Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI). This had the potential to affect all 36 residents.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines to prevent the spread of Covid-19 when during a Covid-19 outbreak, failed to ensure appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) when staff were observed not wearing PPE or not wearing appropriate PPE, in rooms of 8 of 8 residents (R1, R6, R9, R21, R25, R27, R28, R87) in transmission based precautions (TBP) for Covid-19; failed to remove masks after caring for residents in TBP for 5 of 5 residents (R6, R21, R27, R28, R87) on TBP; failed to ensure residents on TBP had a PPE cart outside of their room for 2 of 2 residents (R8, R25); [...]
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services to maintain and/or improve mobility was received for 1 of 2 residents (R27) reviewed for mobility.
Fire safety inspections
5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 31, 2026, 3 on February 19, 2025.
Every fire safety citation5 citations
- F Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- E Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
- F Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 18, 2024 | Fine | $79,694 |
| November 18, 2024 | Payment Denial | 11 days from December 20, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | not reported | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | not reported | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | not reported | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | not reported | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | not reported | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 79.3% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 88.9% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS note on this home's staffing data: The accuracy of the staffing data for this measure could not be validated by CMS.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.09 on weekdays and 4.01 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 16.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.44 in April to June 2025 to 4.79 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.79 | 0.87 | 5.09 | 4.01 | 16.0% | 0 of 90 | 35 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.77 | 0.91 | 5.02 | 4.13 | 35.9% | 0 of 92 | 35 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.72 | 0.82 | 4.94 | 4.17 | 47.6% | 0 of 92 | 36 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.44 | 0.65 | 4.57 | 4.10 | 40.4% | 0 of 91 | 37 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.1 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 36.3 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.2 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.6 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: NEW RICHLAND CARE CENTER.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studnicka, Marnie | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/21/2015 | |
| Alexander, Donald | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/2014 | |
| New Richland Care Center | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/15/1975 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 16, 2024: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 19, 2025: "Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 19, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Lakeshore Rehabilitation Center LLC Waseca, 12.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Good Samaritan Society - Albert Lea Albert Lea, 14.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Parkview Care Center Wells, 16.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- St. Johns on Fountain Lake Albert Lea, 16.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Thorne Crest Retirement Center Albert Lea, 17.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Benedictine Living Community Owatonna Owatonna, 18.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 39 citations
- Whispering Creek Janesville, 19.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Prairie Manor Care Center Blooming Prairie, 21.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is New Richland Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates New Richland Care Center 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did New Richland Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 31, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has New Richland Care Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $79,694 in the last three years.
- Does New Richland Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns New Richland Care Center?
- CMS lists 3 owners and managers. Legal business name: NEW RICHLAND CARE CENTER.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.