Find a nursing home

Home / Minnesota / Wells

Parkview Care Center

55 Tenth Street Southeast, Wells, MN 56097 · Faribault County · (507) 553-3115

30 certified beds, about 22 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245436 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 4, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 22 health citations since August 2024, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.89 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.08 of those hours.

54.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
3G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
3E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
June 4, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    F825 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide physical therapy and occupational therapy as ordered for 5 of 5 residents (R2, R8, R13, R25, R26) reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative services.
April 7, 2026Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    F568 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to maintain complete and accurate accounting records of resident personal funds for 10 of 10 residents (R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R12, R9, R11) whose funds were maintained in a commingled facility trust account.
  2. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to notify the physician of recurrent refusals of physician ordered medication for 1 of 1 residents (R21) who required lactulose for treatment and management of constipation and hepatic failure/alcoholic cirrhosis.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise behavioral care plan after resident-to-resident altercation for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for abuse. In addition, the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect ongoing pattern of medication refusals for 1 of 1 resident (R21) who was prescribed a clinically significant medication used to treat a diagnosis of cirrhosis/hepatic failure.
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure comprehensive assessments for appropriate sling sizes for full body mechanical lift according to manufacturer guidelines to ensure safe transfers to mitigate the risk of injury for 2 of 2 residents (R16, R10) reviewed for safety.
February 5, 2026Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, timely develop and revise a care plan, and follow physician-ordered treatments for a surgical wound for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for non-pressure related skin injuries. The facility's failures resulted in actual harm, as evidenced by documented deterioration of R1's surgical wound from partial to complete dehiscence, with measurable increases in wound depth and tunneling, increased pain, and the need for ongoing treatments.
  2. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to monitor, comprehensively assess, develop, and implement individualized interventions to prevent/mitigate the risk of pressure ulcers to /or deterioration for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This resulted in actual harm for R2 who developed an unstageable pressure ulcer on her right heel and stage 3 pressure ulcer on sacrum.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) who were reviewed for non-pressure skin concerns and pressure ulcers.
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and document review the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing/hand hygiene was implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R4) observed for handwashing/hand hygiene during wound care.
June 25, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure plates, trays, and plate covers were completely dry before storing, and failed to ensure refrigerated food was disposed of timely to prevent bacterial growth and foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents residing in the facility.
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to report the potential theft of money to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for personal property.
  3. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to investigate the potential theft of money for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for personal property.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately code antipsychotic medication use on Section N of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 5 residents (R16) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
  5. C
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a fan blowing directly on clean dishes was free of dust and debris. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents residing in the facility.
April 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 9, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, and provide interventions to prevent pressure ulcer development, promote healing, and prevent deterioration for 1 of 3 residents (R3) who had pressure ulcers. The facility's failures resulted in harm when R3 developed a stage 2 pressure ulcer (PU) that deteriorated to a stage 3.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 9, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor for change in condition following computer tomography with contrast dye to ensure appropriate and prompt treatment for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who was at risk for acute renal failure. Additionally based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, and treat wounds for 1 of 1 residents (R2) reviewed for non-pressure skin concerns.
November 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure provider ordered medications were administered timely for 1 of 1 resident (R1).
August 2, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to follow the appropriate food preparation safety requirements for thawing frozen meat to reduce and/or prevent the risk of food borne illness. This had the potential to affected 25 of 25 residents who obtained their meals from the kitchen.
  2. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during cares, clean lift equipment after use, ensure 1 of 1 staff were fit-tested with N95 masks prior to entering COVID positive resident room, and adhere to EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) for 1 of 1 residents (R2). This had the potential to impact 25 residents residing in the facility.
  3. E
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview and record review, the facility failed to clean resident rooms for (R80, R22, R24, R26, R18) who were on transmission-based precautions (TBP) timely and maintain an environment in good repair affecting 12 residents who used the west unit tub room.
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene care (oral care and bathing) was provided for 2 of 2 residents (R26, R80) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) who were dependent on staff for their care.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement the bowel movement (BM) protocol for 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed for constipation.

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 4, 2026, 4 on June 25, 2025, 4 on August 2, 2024.

Every fire safety citation11 citations
  1. E
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · June 4, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · June 4, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · June 4, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 25, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · June 25, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 25, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · June 25, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have exits that are accessible at all times.
    K 271 · August 2, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · August 2, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · August 2, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · August 2, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
April 24, 2025Payment Denial 11 days from May 29, 2025

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.894.193.86
Registered nurses1.081.060.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.193.713.42
Nurse aides2.59
Licensed practical nurses1.22
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)54.8%42.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover16.7%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.35 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.17 on weekdays and 4.19 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 16.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.96 in April to June 2025 to 4.89 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.891.085.174.19 16.4%2 of 9022
Oct to Dec 20254.210.994.393.73 8.9%2 of 9222
Jul to Sep 20254.441.184.653.88 4.2%0 of 9219
Apr to Jun 20254.961.235.254.23 7.6%0 of 9120
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 20264.191.054.383.735.2%0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Minnesota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Minnesota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.44$19.39 to $23.7229,120
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.83 to $34.2612,840
Registered nurses$48.80$42.76 to $55.1770,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Parkview Care Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.418.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.61.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.42.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.74.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.220.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.85.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.117.115.4

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Parkview Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

51.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: HEARTLAND SENIOR LIVING.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Groskreutz, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual08/22/2022
Ness, JamesCorporate directorIndividual03/03/2014
Noorlun, YvonneCorporate directorIndividual02/28/2022
Weihe, KarenCorporate directorIndividual12/01/2018
Anderson, JeanCorporate officerIndividual03/03/2014
Erickson, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual03/03/2014
Hardt, HeatherCorporate officerIndividual05/03/2021
Knoll, ChristopherCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2019
Suppalla, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual03/03/2014
Hardt, HeatherOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/03/2021
Johnson, AaronOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2021
Hardt, HeatherAdp of the SNFIndividual05/03/2021
Johnson, AaronAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2021
Knoll, ChristopherAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2019

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 7, 2026: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 7, 2026: "Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 5, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Parkview Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Parkview Care Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Parkview Care Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on June 4, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Parkview Care Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Parkview Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Parkview Care Center?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers. Legal business name: HEARTLAND SENIOR LIVING.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection