Home / Pennsylvania / Northumberland
Nottingham Village
58 Neitz Road, Northumberland, PA 17857 · Northumberlnd County · (570) 473-8366
121 certified beds, about 109 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1977
Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395390 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 14, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 31 health citations since January 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated December 6, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.04 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.57 of those hours.
28.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
601/24
201/24
1512/24
102/25
711/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
22D
6E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
November 14, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and store food in a sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen and on two of three nursing units (Station 2 and Station 3).
- E Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an individualized plan of care related to a resident's history of trauma to eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization for two of two residents reviewed for behavior and emotional status (Residents 95 and 101).
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident bathing per preference for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 101).
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 45).
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately assess the use of enabler bars for one of seven residents reviewed for accident hazards (Resident 10).
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent (Residents 66 and 112).
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an eligible resident received a pneumococcal vaccine for one of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Resident 45).
February 11, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of select facility policies, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided that was consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).
December 6, 2024Standard inspection · 15 citations
- E Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain consent for, assess the need for, and assess entrapment risks from bed assistive bars for two of two residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 19 and 108).
- E Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure routine prophylactic dental services for one of three residents reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 62).
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items and maintain equipment in a safe and sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen.
- E Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's arbitration agreements and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's arbitration agreements failed to ensure a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring the selection of a neutral arbitrator for three of three residents reviewed with a signed arbitration agreement (Residents 19, 62, and 68).
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident needs regarding the accessibility of a call bell for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 108).
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of select policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy regarding completion of an investigation of an unknown injury for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 28).
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected residents' status for two of 23 residents reviewed (Residents 108 and 112).
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure quality of care related to a cardiac pacemaker use for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 68).
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a restorative nursing program as recommended by therapy to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of three residents reviewed (Residents 108).
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement care to prevent potential complications from a dialysis access site for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis services (Resident 62).
- D Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet resident's needs related to call bell response time for two of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 19 and 52).
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate labeling and storage of medications and biologicals on one of three nursing units (Station III) and for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 103).
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer and administer an influenza immunization unless refused for one of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 3).
- D Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer and administer a COVID immunization for one of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident 3).
January 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed clinical record review, review of select policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the proper safety and security of medication dispensing for one of three residents reviewed (Resident CR1).
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete clinical documentation for one of 3 residents reviewed (Resident CR1).
January 5, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- G Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of select facility policies and procedures, facility documentation, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm with serious injuries, including diagnoses of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), right hip contusion, and scalp laceration for one of one resident reviewed for abuse (Resident 41).
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and maintain equipment in a sanitary manner and ensure temperature monitoring was in place to prevent the potential spread of food borne illness in the facility's main kitchen.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure confidentiality of personal health information and a resident's right to privacy for one of three nursing units reviewed (Nursing Unit 1; Residents 9, 37, and 57).
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 2).
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection regarding transmission-based precautions on one of three nursing units (Nursing Unit 1; Resident 44).
- B Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 8).
Fire safety inspections
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on November 14, 2025.
Every fire safety citation1 citation
- E Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 6, 2024 | Payment Denial | 1 days from January 29, 2025 |
| January 5, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.04 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.57 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.64 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.32 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.15 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 28.6% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.71 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.20 on weekdays and 3.64 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 12.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.93 in April to June 2025 to 4.04 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.04 | 0.57 | 4.20 | 3.64 | 12.9% | 0 of 90 | 109 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.04 | 0.56 | 4.26 | 3.49 | 9.6% | 0 of 92 | 113 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.96 | 0.52 | 4.13 | 3.52 | 5.2% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.93 | 0.55 | 4.08 | 3.55 | 4.8% | 0 of 91 | 113 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.3 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.5 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.3 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.6 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.9 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: LEEDS HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ridgway Holding, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/04/2003 |
| Frederick Kessler Jr Estate | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/09/2018 |
| Scott, Robert | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 10/01/2008 | |
| Gesumaria, Beth | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/30/2023 | |
| Shebest, Stuart | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Kessler, Amanda | Corporate director | Individual | 07/16/2004 | |
| Kessler, Amanda | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Misener, Andrew | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Scott, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/07/2025 | |
| Shebest, Stuart | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/07/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on November 14, 2025: "Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 14, 2025: "Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 14, 2025: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 14, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Sunbury Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Sunbury, 3.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Nursing and Rehabilitation at the Mansion Sunbury, 3.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Buffalo Valley Lutheran Villag Lewisburg, 7.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Milton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Milton, 7.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Manor at Penn Village, the Selinsgrove, 7.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 65 citations
- Oak Glen Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Lewisburg, 7.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Emmanuel Center for Nursing Danville, 11.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Grandview Nursing and Rehabilitation Danville, 11.8 mi · not rated · 115 citations
Pennsylvania contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Pennsylvania Department of Health, Division of Nursing Care Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Pennsylvania Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Department of Aging, 717-783-8975. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Pennsylvania Department of Health Nursing Care Facility Locator, where Pennsylvania publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Nottingham Village's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Nottingham Village 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Nottingham Village get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 14, 2025. The Pennsylvania average is 10.
- Has Nottingham Village been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years.
- Does Nottingham Village accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Nottingham Village?
- CMS lists 10 owners and managers. Legal business name: LEEDS HEALTH CARE SERVICES INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.